Accused:

narfito / wxystad


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis



Game number(s):

3247190


Comments:

After reviewing these two players I found that they have played 52 games together and they play at the exact same time every time. I find that hard to believe that they are actually ...

This system blows because you cant respond to the "negative" feedback that you are given by some morons. At least you could respond before and let people know that the negative was stupid. Now you can do everything right but they give you bad ratings because they are idiots.

I think maybe having a cap of 50 points lost in a game would be a good idea.
I don't shy away from games due to ranks and I think I've lost about 50 points once. I don't see how that's much of a big deal.

DUDE are you serious? ALL you play are partner games and private games with higher ranking ...

The scoring system is fine. If you think otherwise, you probably have inflated sense of how good you actually are. Except for a very few of the top players, nobody's score is going to continue to rise forever. Everyone reaches a "plateau", where their score is not going to get past a certain point ...

I just lost 60 points to privates coz i had bad dice (now im not moaning) but did these privates win with skill or because i had bad dice??
The entire point is that the point system doesn't work on a game by game basis, it works over multiple games.

You may have got bad dice that cause you to ...

***result ***

Game 2455853
7 Heroes Bracket - game #3
1. tmclay99 (Elmyra Gainsborough)
2. killmanic (Cid Highwind)
3. dragon dor (Barret Wallace)
4. kratos644 (Cloud Strife)

OK then maybe cap the limit. Currently the max is 100. how about a lower maximum?

Maybe this calc works?? with the different system it would be (loser's score / winner's score) * (20/ (the number of ranks lower than the loser/3 or 1 if higher rank)), up to a maximum of 100 points from each opponent.

a loss : (2500/900)*(20/(9/3)) = 19
a win : (900/2500)*(20/1) = 7

Not a ...

im in if you need someone

I guess maybe my point wasn't taken exactly as I was intending it to be. I guess for me with a rank of colonel I tend to get emails about people who want to play with just colonel and above. This to me suggests that others in here try to not play the lower ranks due to the point spread that occurs ...

While I do think that we can pick and choose which players we play.... I believe that the point calculation is not asfair as it could be. I think that if a low ranking player is skillful enough to win a game against a higher ranked player then they should be rewarded accordingly. This does, however ...

I would like to have the option during board creation to select the number of turns that a player can timeout before they are booted. This would allow people who want to play a proper game to join tables where the number might be 0 or 1.

Also, I think having the option to select other parameters ...