Nice try, I'm not obsessed with you, just stubborn. And you're really not helping yourself here. It's unfortunate that you do not get that.
So yes, my profile is a reminder to you: you do not control what I say or when I shut up. To everyone else, it's just a statement about a location that I am not ...

...you lost any chance of that a long time ago. Keep dancing.

Giving you fair notice: I updated my location for you. As a reminder.

The only problem I have is that you cannot see the failure in logic of your three statements.
And nope, I won't be bullied by you telling me to shut up.

Have the last word. For now. Perhaps in 11 days I remind you that I have every right to state my opinion and to speak up. You don't control that.

So let me get this straight: you are here for the forum and this is how you spend your time?
I'm speechless.

Now, it would be nice if you stopped conflating issues, using fallacies and attempts to spin the points back on me when it's painfully clear what you are doing here. If comparing my ...

Call bullshit all you want. Call me a hypocrite. Make wild assumptions about my motives. I don't care.

But when you conflate things to fit your holier-than-thou grandstanding, yeah, I will call you on it... being passive-aggressive, for example, is making a point of letting everyone else know what ...

Still making a fool of yourself. Just shut up dude. You bumped a dead thread unnecessarily to continue your passive aggressive attacks and flames. And I stand by my opinion of you. Telling you to shut up is not a personal attack. The point being made is that you're trolling, baiting, bullying, and ...

I'm going to point out now that Orwell has me on his foe list. For those who don't know, this means that my posts are automatically hidden from him. When he sees I have answered, he could stay out of the thread, but he chooses to enter. Then he has to click the button to display my post, and then ...

I'm going to point out now that Orwell has me on his foe list. For those who don't know, this means that my posts are automatically hidden from him. When he sees I have answered, he could stay out of the thread, but he chooses to enter. Then he has to click the button to display my post, and then ...

Haha "Rage"? He's completely calm.
Sorry, I thought leaping in with trumped up language to make rash personal judgements was rage. I stand corrected.
Since you are totally incapable of checking yourself, show me some examples. You'd be better off following my advice, and figure out that now is ...

Haha "Rage"? He's completely calm.
Sorry, I thought leaping in with trumped up language to make rash personal judgements was rage. I stand corrected.
Since you are totally incapable of checking yourself, show me some examples. You'd be better off following my advice, and figure out that now is ...

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Haha "Rage"? He's completely calm.

Sorry, I thought leaping in with trumped up language to make rash personal judgements was rage. I stand corrected.

It took you 11 days to think of a comeback?
Nope - just saw his post yesterday. I had my say. And you can follow your own advice.
Bullshit. You responded in this thread twice after Barksdale posted. Or do you admit you don't pay attention to things? You're a joke, and you don't know when to quit ...

Serbia wrote:It took you 11 days to think of a comeback?

Nope - just saw his post yesterday. I had my say. And you can follow your own advice.

Nice spin. You make yourself seem so... innocent.
Until...
But check out the log and the chat and you will see who the idiot is. Orwell, just be glad you can cuss me behind a keyboard because I can assure you that you aren't man enough for me little boy. I know your kind and I'm sorry people picked ...

So, take my reason or leave it - but "clever" sign offs don't win arguments; substance does.
2015-07-04 02:26:42 - Or well: F uck off.
Right. I thought you might reply with substance. My mistake.

So yeah, there is nothing quite like a "gotcha" moment that I already acknowledged and apologized ...

So, take my reason or leave it - but "clever" sign offs don't win arguments; substance does.
2015-07-04 02:26:42 - Or well: F uck off.
Right. I thought you might reply with substance. My mistake.

So yeah, there is nothing quite like a "gotcha" moment that I already acknowledged and apologized ...

PS. HE TOOK THE CARD!!! WOO HOO!!!!
Yeah, imagine that... I report him for 15 rounds of hostage taking and he takes the card. A real stand up.
Really don't understand what you're complaining about. You're a premium, so you can play an unlimited number of games anyway, so it's not like you need a ...

I agree that your report has merit but I wanted to find out if this can be sorted without any involvement from a mod. You do have a very valid reason to make this report since he has stalled in eliminating you in this game. I do, however, also can not ignore that you happen to be a premium member ...

PS. HE TOOK THE CARD!!! WOO HOO!!!!
Yeah, imagine that... I report him for 15 rounds of hostage taking and he takes the card. A real stand up.
Really don't understand what you're complaining about. You're a premium, so you can play an unlimited number of games anyway, so it's not like you need a ...

owenshooter wrote:PS. HE TOOK THE CARD!!! WOO HOO!!!!

Yeah, imagine that... I report him for 15 rounds of hostage taking and he takes the card. A real stand up.

Actually, a better strategy would be to give up a Canadian territory rather than the USA bonus, but still...
On first read this does fit the definition of a hostage situation; however I think that is intended to apply where there is no tactical loss by taking the player, and no reason not to. In ...

And thank you for defining a hostage situation.

he is not holding you hostage... he is playing a strategy... he wants to kill you with 5 cards, for obvious reasons...
I disagree - spite is not a strategy.

Waiting for 5 cards, however, is. Or did you conveniently not read that part of what you quoted?

Bollocks.
His motive is established in ...

owenshooter wrote:he is not holding you hostage... he is playing a strategy... he wants to kill you with 5 cards, for obvious reasons...

I disagree - spite is not a strategy.