game 4928327 a player started with 10 in Moscow.. his other initial placements appear normal.

In game 4880008 I held Lyncestians, but got no bonus.

Just finishing my first game.. and had some observations..

1. Naval Superiority is pretty useless as far as I can see. One player in ur game
took it and bombarded 3 colonies.. costing my partner and I builds for India and
SE Asia.. okay.. but it cost him whatever he needed to do that,, and he was ...

On reducing the neutrals.. it would definetely change the game.. and not, I think, for the better..

My reasoning is that what would happen is it would turn into a WWI type game,
with slow building up of massive armies. As it is, it's a very fluid game.. which I think
is a good thing..

Jim

Just started playing this board (4-player, chained, no spoils).. and have some initial impressions..

1. Where are the shire names. ?? Or.. some color coding in the bonus listing..??

2. The southern 2-territory shire seems too easy to take.. especially with a random start
where someone gets a ...

It should be made obvious what Isle-de-France connects with.. I got a nasty surprise
beacuse I thout it was contained fully within a territory...

Tanks GIMIL.. but when I tried.."Only Moderators can enter new posts"

Ah well..

In the ACW game and the EasternFront.. the two games I play.. the color is great.. but
the background of the army circles make them very difficul t to read. Could we
have an option to turn the army circles white..? Or make them all white..

Thanks..

It's been fun.. but there are too many bugs.. not worth doing..

Shertenn

Napolleonic Europe (Castle Risk)

I'd like to see a Castle Risk -like board.. I 'm not sure how you'd do the sea movement
or the cards, (probably not do them, actually).. Perhaps the seas would be like
land areas (uhm.. like in Alexander's Empire..?)

Also.. NO unlimited fortifications ...

Sounds like an excellent idea.. I'd go for it..