Seattle 34
Indy 27

Raiders will go 3-13

Oh the arrogance! (to quote several other posts) Unless you have PhDs in the field of science, how can you claim to know more about science than a doctor/president of a reputable institute for scientific research?

This will be my last post. If the past week has shown me anything, it's that you'll ...

No doubt you've noticed the recent flurry of newspaper articles and TV interviews which have been proclaiming that the Big Bang theory had finally been proved. An observation by the COBE (Cosmic Background Explorer) satellite had verified a basic prediction of the Big Bang, so astronomers claimed ...

The theo ry of the big bang(an actual theory, unlike God[hypothesis]) at least, takes this law into account.

Actually, the Big Bang is not a theory. A hypothesis only becomes a theory when large amounts of evidence agree with it. None (or at least very little) comes even close to agreeing with ...

That's a lot of ground to cover...here we go...

So...you're using the old something absolutely perfect would exist rather than not exist so it exists argument? That was, like, the first attempted proof of God ever, and it's been debunked many times. Defining something into existence makes no sense ...

He sounds very pleasant.

I could have made it a lot less pleasant.

But that hardly explains where God came from. If everything needs a creator then he does as well. And if he doesn't then why does the universe?

The definition of God denies that He needs a creator. If He is all powerful, He ...

I always bring this up, but no one ever touches it. Calling yourself "son(Daughter) of God" may have just been an expression of the time.

1. It wasn't
2. He said He WAS God (and Son of God), very different things

I think you may have miss translated that last one too. From the statement "He who ...

Yet you have no real knowledge of 75% of the gospels

I never said that, I said I don't know as much about Matthew, Mark, and Luke. I didn't say I know nothing about them. When I get more time I'll respond to the rest.

One comment. If someone does not believe Jesus is God, they cannot be a ...

Did anyone catch the irony of the above?

That is pretty funny :lol: What I meant is that I haven't read that particular book. I've read the Chronicles of Narnia, Screwtape Letters, and part of Out of the Silent Planet. I guarantee you it's not in those books. If I had to guess, I would say it was ...

BTW, since you don't have very good taste in Sci-Fi, Star Wars is better.

Star wars is stupid (just wanted to get that out there)

How about the fact that he didnt actually claim to be God ?
Find me a quote from the gospels of Mathew,Mark or Luke, should be easy to find dozens surely !

What's wrong with John?!?! I know all my examples are from John, but that's just because I know John the best out of the four (not three ...

How about the fact that he didnt actually claim to be God ?
Find me a quote from the gospels of Mathew,Mark or Luke, should be easy to find dozens surely !

No problem.

"Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father" John 14:9
"I and the Father are one" John 10:30
"Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly ...

Didn't see the other part of ur post

There are thousands of reasons & choices. But if I am restricted to your narrow view point, then Liar/Lunatic are the logical choices.

Give me any other logical choices and I'll consider them, but I don't see how there could be any other choices.

I find it hilarious that you are using a man who wrote novels about magical beings and fairy's to prove that magical beings and fairy's exist. :lol:

I find it hilarious how you obviously know nothing about CS Lewis. He wrote more than just the Chronicles of Narnia. I don't know which book this is ...

Exactly. A great man....but just a man like you and I.

I don't think you realize how impossible that is. Let's look at the logical steps.

Jesus was a man who claimed to be God. There are two possibilities:

1. He was telling the truth
2. He was lying

Let's look at 2 for a second

2a. He knew he ...

I'll provide as many sources as I can, but I will admit some of the claims I made were by word-of-mouth. However, some of the claims you have made (I'm sure, if not all) are by word-of-mouth as well, and to be valid they need sources also. In other words, we all have to play by the same rules

Do ...

Evolution is the opposite of God. It denies that God exists, and no macro-evolutionary idea has ever been proven. EVERY test ever done has proven a young (and therefore created) earth.

Yeah, all that proof of it must be made up or something.

You're right. Here's some proof evolution cannot be ...

I haven't read the whole post, but I'll answer the topic...

The fact is no one can say there is no God. The only other possibility is evolution, which is so absurd and unlikely that it could never happen. No one can prove God exists, but it's rather self-evident.

Now to the real question, is God ...