by the way, the problem is easely resolved... i'll just join hi rank private games, speed games created by people who I know and i'll start only private games...

This suggestion was just made to avoid this!

Don't you think it would be more fair to set a maximum and a minimum people can gain or lose in terms of points? Like 10 or 15 points is the minimum I get if I win and 30/35 is the maximum I can lose?
I can't believe no one has answered this question. It already exists. The max is 100, the min is ...

And if this pointig system wudn't exist, what kinda one do you suggest ? Linear one ? Lets say they replaced, then think about what it is going to be ? Do you see a end point a player can reach ? I say no, if a linear point system wud existed then you wud see many player wud reach 100.000 points ...

i got what you are saying but don't you think that like this is going to be harder to make low rank people play with high rank? Just proposing a minimum (say 10) which is really low and a maximum (say 40) which is high still and you don't lose the "plateau" thing... i just thought it would have been ...

more over this is the reason behind why many high rank players at a certain point stops joining public games and just do private games between each other... because they just gain/lose 20 points each game

this is not a matter of perception... is a matter of fairness in points... Is not a perception losing 40/50 points or gaining 5/6

Hi everyone.
I became brigadier few weeks ago and I started thinking that points gained or losed in a match are not that fair.

I know that high rank people usually have much more experience and therefore if they beat a cook that's not much and if a cook beats a brigadier (i've never seen it yet tho ...

When will it be? Is it standard i suppose.. is it?