Thanks Chapcrap, it always helps to merge things down.

I always find games through the game finder, where it is easy enough to check the standard box and not the freestyle box. I don't know that this would benefit me in any way, but I can't really see any reason not to implement it. It doesn't really have a downside.

This gets brought up all the time; people make games that are favorable-looking to new recruits, and get loaded up with NR's, many of whom deadbeat. That said, I would put the odds of multi abuse at near zero. I am not familiar enough with the specifics for farming rules to have a sense on that.

13 was probably just age at the time the multi was made.

Well alright then. Thanks BG. I didn't have a bone to pick, just saw them reserving spots a couple times for each other and wondered. I'm sure you got it right.

It will help the mods if you can post more than one game of examples. Find some other games where they have both played, and demonstrate that this was not just you being pinned between them or something. From the game chat, it seems they know each other, but they mostly look like guys who like this ...

Any mods looking into this? I don't see a tag in the title for anyone.
sorry I saw the SD at the end and my brain translated it to read SN, so I thought Sniffie had this one.
And I didn't want to take all the cases from the others ;)
sorry for the mix up
I'll make sure not to put acronym-y ...

waltero wrote:Are you asking me to do the coding?

No.

I'm no mod, but looking at the log it does not appear that any hostage taking is in effect. In the last few turns, each player has cashed a set of 450 or more troops. Hardly a hostage situation. Nobody is getting booted from your game on just that evidence, I'd guess. You'll have to find some other ...

I have asked before, and I was told that there is specifically no such thing as foe abuse. You are welcome to foe anyone for any reason (without having to explain yourself to anyone), and as such, anyone else is welcome to foe you for any reason whatsoever. If you want to go through and research ...

Any mods looking into this? I don't see a tag in the title for anyone.

thanks, but it is not JUST ME ! its everybody
If it is not just you that you mean, then please be clearer in your accusations. You said that he left you a poor rating, and then said: On this particular date where I received all 3's, so did other of his former clan mates
In the game in question ...

Accused:
kuma32478

The accused are suspected of:
Rating Abuse

Game number:
11793125

Comments: Left a rating of "Average" in all three categories.
Please look at his ratings left page ---its ridiculous !!

Okay, so it's not exactly a quote, but I filled the form out properly for you, and ...

I mean, I'm assuming they are friends.

Well, it could have some strategic difference; say you know your opponent has a big stack in an escalating game, and you know it's in one of a few places (fog game) that you will be able to see by the end of your turn. You could hold off and deploy in the right place, rather than guessing or wimping ...

To be clear, this would still take place before you got spoils, such that you aren't proposing a huge change in strategy, right? I really don't see this being much of a change otherwise.

I have asked before, and I was told that there is specifically no such thing as foe abuse. You are welcome to foe anyone for any reason (without having to explain yourself to anyone), and as such, anyone else is welcome to foe you for any reason whatsoever. If you want to go through and research ...

I would be both surprised if this has never been suggested before and be surprised if it hasn't been rejected before. If you want to keep your troops around, then don't attack with them. I really don't see this as something with strategic benefit.

smithallan wrote:Oops. Sorry about that.


My game was Game Game 11913170

And his other recent deadbeat games are
Game Game 11913101
Game Game 11912945
Game Game 11889995

4 out of the last 6. The other 2 were games he didnt deadbeat, only because he one.

Added Links

Concise description:

Remove all female moderators from the roster.

Specifics/Details:

Women/girls are not reliable and therefore make wrong decisions when moderating.
Females on an online gaming site? Really? They are probably sexually frustated and therefore bitter/angry, which makes ...

Accused:

TheDude25
thisfuckingguy


The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy
-and unrelatedly-
Other: thisfuckingguy - inappropriate name



Game numbers--This is the sum total of 10 finished games in which both players played.
These are games won by TheDude25 :
10855818 (4 ...

Accused:

Tiagotavares



The accused are suspected of:

Having multiple accounts, alt. having a secret alliance with:

david1989

rickythetwin (not in the actual game, but a reason why I filing this accusation)



Game number(s):

11917270


Comments:

Something was off from the start when ...

I said that game prompted a report. You happened to lose that game. I did not say that the fact you lost was the reason you filed a report. I also noted that I thought there was a good probability you were/are right:
To be clear, I'm not saying you aren't probably right (emphasis added)

I try not ...

I would just assume that coding-wise, in for a penny, in for a pound, since the degree to which it would be more work for more than 2 players is minimal, compared with the main challenge of setting it up at all.

Sebstar, I do not think you understand the suggestion. Let's say you are in a tournament with Player ABCDE. You play 10 games at a time together, and you happen to win one game, but you are curious whether you won because of skill or luck. This suggestion, if implemented, would let you select a ...