Awesome idea. Good job suggesting this

I was just thinking now... It might be interesting to start a "Most Valuable Player" rating for the 3+ team games. Since we can now pick which team we'd like to play on... it'll be useful for players to perhaps pick which team they'd like to play for with this statistic in mind. It's also cool ...

I LOVE IT!!

Let's roll this puppy out! Great job Sully.

Great job Sully !!

I'm really loving the revamp and I can't wait to play the map. I feel like this map will really add a whole lot of value to the site. Classic Shapes and Classic Art just aren't the same... Once more, BRAVO!!

N. America, S. America, Europe and Oceania look awesome and besides ...

totally agree. for instance on the classic map. I had a hard time trying to tell with blue and esp. green cards when the name is so short. like, F1 and F1 The one on the right is bold and usually you can make out the bold color quickly and easily but with short words it's a little harder. Not good ...

It's luck of the draw and it works both ways. yes, it can be extremely frustrating when your opponent starts with a bonus or has so much majority in an area that it's inevitable that he'll claim the area but I don't think it should be coded for. -Makes the game unpredictable which it should be.

i exchange a set where I own one of the territories, the log says "got bonus of 2 troops added to X" which completely gives away my position.
Sorry my bad. The log does say "got bonus of 2 troops added to ?" but it still shows the three possible territs that you might be occupying.
See http://www ...

I fully agree and I would like to add another point here which I've brought up before.
Exchanging cards... If I'm playing Feudal War for instance where you only start off in a single area, and i exchange a set where I own one of the territories, the log says "got bonus of 2 troops added to X" which ...

Agreed. I also think that the tags would serve more as a better description than the rating.
Nice idea!

I suggested this sometime ago and I still feel like it's a worthwhile suggestion. My understanding is that wouldn't take much effort from Lack either.

Here's what people had to say about it.
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=58890&p=1500629

Just found this post and I think it's a brilliant idea.

Thinking of a map like Siege!, where the walls might change from inwards only to both ways if the player owned, lets say, the walls and east and west wards. Then suddenly the swamp and plains are no longer as easily defendable to whoever ...

I like this idea and I've thought of posting a similar request myself. but when you think of it, the log could end up becoming extremely long and too messing to be useful. I think it'll be a feature that turns out to be a dud.

Also, use the form when posting a suggestion... thanks

Concise description:
In fog of war games, when a player hands in their set of cards, the log should hide the names of the cards rather than displaying them. The problem is that occationally, opponents can figure out your location by seeing whether or not you receive a bonus or not from the set ...

I like this idea. Need to get creative with the clock though. That could be a problem.

Also clear that "tar mineldur" avoids attacking "herchnarcha" in most games.

Sure, the times that people login and play their turns does vary from person to person. I generally play 07:00 -08:00 and 17:00 - 18:00. But if you took the community in general, we all play the majority of our games in the 14-16 hours of average day time... Leaving opponents waiting for 8-10 hours ...

MrBenn makes a good point but I still think this idea has potential... There must be some way to get this going?
ANything creative with regards to the vetoíng idea?

Also remember that players wouldn't give spectate permission to someone who had already been abusive in the game before he/she was eliminated. And if someone starts abusing the privilage, his spectate permission can be removed. Like InkL0sed said, this would be self-moderated

I've never been in a game where someone has announced border counts and ruined it for the other players but it's not too hard to imagine that some idiot out there would do it. Although, since the spectate option is only available to eliminated players, if someone were to announce border counts, they ...

Great idea. Categorized maps makes the page much smaller and the options layout is 100%

again, great idea!

Sadly, I do realize that there are those out there that would abuse this feature. But the use of it is totally up to the descretion of the players themselves.

E.g. If I'm in a social game with 5 other players, (two that i trust and three that I don't), then if a friend of mine is eliminated or I ...

Concise description:

⋅ Anyone who has played and lost at a fog of war game will tell you that it truely sucks not being able to see what's going on in the game with the remaining players. You can read the logs to get a gist of what's happening but too much is left to the imagination. I ...

Concise description:

⋅ When viewing your active games. It'll be good to see who's online so that you have a better idea of when it might be your game. I.E. If the person you are currently waiting for is online but hasn't started his turn yet. Then you can wait for him to begin playing ...