I'll sign the petition. For your information I think Dug is an asshole. But then again I think Wicked in an asshole too. I cannot call Lack an asshole because he is far to clever to post very much to allow anyone to make an accurate opinion.

Also, I am an asshole. If anyone thinks they are not an ...

I have no problem with anything you have said here, the main problem I have is with the scoring system. I am going to make a few counter points to your post about why I have a problem and I hope you can take my comments to your post as constructive:

I have to maintain a 5-1 ratio just to come ...

I would like to suggest that the points, and the scoreboard, really are meaningless. I wouldn't care if the system was rigged so that I could never get more than 10 points for a win, and always lost 50 when I lost a game. I'm just here to play, and have fun, which I'm capable of doing win or lose ...

I've read your post, and I've played in team games with and against Blitz and other high scorers. You just don't win as many points in a team game. You have to win so many more team games to equal the points you can win in a single game. My numbers weren't wrong, I went and looked at some of Blitz ...

You do realize high ranked players get like 10 points or less for a doubles win? You do realize they lose like 40-50 points for a loss right? Now I just glanced at a few of these doubles games with Blitz paired with a low ranked player, so the numbers are a bit vague. I would be curious to see if ...

These were the posts I was talking about when I said we should support the mods, Lack, and their decision 100%.

I question things. Are you not human and merely a sheep?

I am sick of people complaining about the scoring system! I am sick of people, "Arguing" Dug's case for him! The deleted games ...

[/quote]I've heard a few people claim "it's broken." Can someone please explain to me in a succinct, readable post why you think that?[quote]

Frankly I find that hard to believe. Here is a link to my own post about it, yes I was wrong about Blitz at the time, but the rest of the points are still ...

A few points to outline my position before I go onto my questions:

1. The bribing someone with a years membership was wrong.

2. I think he has a good case he just went about the solution the wrong way.

3. Urm, I guess that is it.

However, the reasons for doing it, IMHO, were correct ...

Mbohn2: Liar, fraud, and a foul mouthed child who cannot take his losses.

MG.

Your inability to let anything EVER drop is evident by the fact that you felt it necessary to keep this going via the forum. You ARE a poor sport, you are on my ignore and I only saw this post because one of the 90 players that enjoyed playing against me and gave me postive feedback let me know of ...

I have played mbohn many times and never had a problem with him. He's a good player in my opinion.

His ability isn't the problem, nor what this post is about.

I apprieciate that, thank you. Should I label abuse reports of this kind in a specific way in future to help you notice it?

MG.

I understand that all feedback cannot be moderated. Indeed most revenge feedback is understandedly missed simply because such a volumn cannot be looked through with such limited manpower. This is not my concern, I cannot expect the mods to read through all feedback.

But when reported on the cheat ...

He abuses the feedback system.

Suspect users: Just mbohn2.

Game number: 277435

Comments: He always gives revenge feedback, despite the feedback rules not to do so. I took a look at all of his bad feedback and lo and behold he always gives one back, there is even a couple for people with 25 ...

I used to think the dice were jinxed too. I learned. I'm not the happy fluffy type quoting probabilities and how the dice even out etc. Instead I looked at the odds and how to use the probabilities to my advantage. My game has stepped up a whole lot since then, here is some of the reasons how:

1 ...

Congratulations Evil Semp. You, as a member of the human race, contribute greatly to my income. I make millions from people like you who both miss the point and state the obvious.

I salute you sir.

Quote "In conclusion, if you don't like the current scoring system you also don't like America."

I dont like the current scoring system. I quite like some of America. I dont like other parts of it. I am British and not American. You cannot acuse me of being either liberal nor conservative since ...

I dont take advantage of it because I payed my $20 dollars and I would prefer to change it for the better for everyone.

Admittedly that sentence makes me sound like a bloody egomaniac messiah out for justice and the American (or in my case British) way. Whatever way you take it, kiss my arse!

I outlined in a post below in a logical fashion why team players are high ranked because of the favoritsm of the score rating system.

Most ignored it, probubly because most were busy knocking one out over blitz who will be at 5k within a month, or spending time moarning Nicole Smith instead of ...

I look at Blitz and his recent 4000 points gain thing. Let me say I have nothing against Blitz, infact I have all respect for him.

So what is my gripe?

I rarely if ever play team games. I play singles and in those games sometimes I win, sometimes I lose. I win, I get lots of points, I lose ...

According to the instructions, I should get bonus armies on countries that I own which I also have a card of every turn. However this does not seem to be the case...nor does it appear to be the case if I own the continent of which the country is part off.

Now, if I trade in a set of cards it ...

1. So I'm a (0 - 0) ratings, however I am not a n00b risk player. I have 4 games going, in one game we are annihilating our opponent because we are all using team chat and working together. Why in the other three games do my allies not talk?

2. Why is there players with (lots - hardly barely a ...