This is a bad idea. The moderators don't need to waste their time and/or resources on deciding if it is fair for someone to foe you. Why should someone have to justify why they want to foe someone else? There are over 20,000 other players to go up against. Move on, and don't worry about the ones who ...

There is no need to change the rules. If a player deadbeats, and leaves several territories with multiple troops on them, why shouldn't a player get spoils just as he would for conquering any other territory? It cost him troops to get it!

I don't see this as a plus. Why should my enemies get additional troops when I turn in spoils?

Playing against higher ranking players is how new players gain experience. Why should that experience be restricted just because higher ranking players assume the new players will deadbeat? If you want only high ranking players, go private!

This is not necessary. The four game rule allows a prospect the ability to play as long as he or she desires, FOR FREE! If the person is having a good time, and wants to enhance the experience, he or she only needs to pay $25 for an entire year! This is not a lot to ask. It's quite reasonable. When ...

I disagree with this suggestion. Not all new recruits are deadbeats. Why punish all of them for the actions of a few? This could cause new players to have difficulty in finding a game, thereby giving them a poor experience. Why would they ever join if they're having additional restrictions placed on ...

Auto kicking is a little harsh. If a player has multiple games going, it could cause a real problem for someone who doesn't deserve it. I think the armies awarded for missed turns should be placed by the computer ON RANDOM TERRITORIES. This would eliminate the use of this concession as a strategy ...

This is a great idea. If you can't get to a computer that day, at least you don't totally lose out on the armies you would have gotten had you taken the turn. On the other hand, random deployment removes the strategic advantage to missing turns, and thereby holding up the game for everyone else ...

As it is, the attacker does have a slight advantage with an extra die, but the defender has an advantage by winning all ties. Giving the defender an additional advantage with an extra die is neither fair nor necessary.