Nowhere in the first paragraph did I admit I was being unfair. You think what I did was unfair. Admitting that I did something that you think is unfair isn't the same thing as admitting it's unfair.

And now back to the actual topic of our conversation! Actually, no, that's already been addressed, I ...

Actually, our desire was just for a quick game, and since both of us knew we would be on for long enough to play through a game if it was just the two of us, and since all the three person games we had been in together where the third person was just some random player had that third person be very ...

Unfair, perhaps, but then, the idea behind alliances is to give you the advantage. I say if a tactic helps you win, and isn't taking abuse of the game mechanics, it's fair game. But...As for the alliance being suspicous, how so? I know SqueekyDragon outside of CC, he's the one who introduced me to ...

I realize that in general most cases of inactivity in a game are just the person joined then forgot, or something similar, and it's virtually impossible to prove otherwise, however, in this case...

Game 13306, from the in game chat:

2006-04-08 00:53:44 - SqueekyDragon: Alliance arranged between ...

I don't know what the problem with the copyright would be. What is there to be copyrighted? The map? I don't think you can copyright that. The name? I doubt it.