alright, thank you for the feedback. I will update this as soon as my pc has been repaired, which is only a couple of days.

This map looks visually stunning!

I preferred the look of v2 to v3 - the region areas look better as if they have been painted on rather than outline-painted. It's really difficult to see how things connect - the dotted lines are too heavy. There's also a lot of empty space, that you could utilise ...

I could tone down the city images, but really, I can't see what the problem is, how is this map confusing? There are a lot of quenched maps that are much more confusing...

please point out whats confusing, and perhaps some alternative to it.

The background looks good (did you create that grunge yourself?)
The borders look quickly drawn and don't fit well with the map. It looks like it took you 2 mintues to draw those. I like the text you've chosen. Although the small map may be a bit hard to read. Are you sure you need army circles on ...

I like the blood drops but you should make them just - 1 for the troops on it. THey are hard to get rid of now and if they get -1 auto deploy it would make a lot of territories only defendedby 1 troop.

I see the logic in that, but how do I do that? could you show me an xml example?

The poisoning ...

the instructions about cities can only own territories or something ridiculous doesn't make sense (i'm talking about the paragraph right above bonuses)

"territories with cities cannot be owned unless all cities in the territory are owned. cities can attack territories next to them and vice versa ...

please give me some feedback to work with?

how does it make sense that all boats can bombard all boats? I would think that the ships would only worry about the ships that poses an immediate treath to its existence, and the cannons of that time really didnt have that impressive ranges...

I like this a lot better, much easier on the eyes(;

Gameplay looks excellent, will be a fun map to play. I do however think that the huge bevel makes the landareas look blurry and very unnatural. Height is usually much harder to see from top perspective. Try going softer and maybe adding some texture?

I definitely like the map, but it is almost completely illegible. I definitely like the old raggedy map style that you used, but as for names, I can barely read them. Also, it's hard to tell which areas are territories and which are non-playable areas. Could you clear it up a bit, maybe make the ...

I see your working with American English, I would remove any words that are unique to america/spelled differently or it could be hugely annoying.

Also a map that is not very good for players who dont have their first language as English.


?!

why is British English more correct than American ...

Circus Maximus: 3824220
Waterloo: 3824255

Hey
I can't offer much advice; but I've got to say that this map looks really awesome, can't wait to play this:D
Theres obviously quiet a lot of research behind this, appreciate your efforts:D

ya, the text in the small is really hard to read, and is it really need to split the word 'territory' into two lines?

I'll see what I can do about it



Army shadows-these is circle where you put army numbers.

I can give you sugestion,that you first add army circle and names,and then to create ...

nvm.
- post deleted.

update number 4
small and large map
added a bit of route
added suppliespoints
added sharper line between map and notepad
better brides?

do you guys think ammunition points are a good idea?

http://www.fileden.com/files/2006/11/16/385447/market%20gardenv4small.jpg
http://www.fileden.com/files ...

the.killing.44 wrote:IMO you should make all the cities start neutral, possibly with 4 or 5.

crosseout wrote:Neutrals
5 neutrals in every city
1-3 neutrals on normal territories.
3 neutrals on any river crossing

whitestazn88 wrote:looks pretty cool, but one of the cities isn't on the trail...

i'll fix that

i personally like the 2nd one better, though i would make a more definate line between the map and the note pad. It looks likea like they are just melting togeather

2nd one it is then, and i'll make a clear division.


ok,lets try to give some oppinion.
1.Add army shadows
2.Bonus space cover to ...

ok,lets try to give some oppinion.
1.Add army shadows
2.Bonus space cover to much of map.
3.Bridges can be much better.
4.I belive that everything writen on these map size,will be very imposible to read in small map.
5.I think that you start with huge task,to create map with these numbers of ...

version 10

update

added color

which one do you like the best?
this(?): or this(?): thanks for feedback:D

the.killing.44 wrote:Wow this is looking nice, my only critique so far is about the bonuses - you probably want some color code or bolder lines to clarify further.

What did you do this in?

will do:D

photoshop cs2

thanks for the feedback

qwert wrote:well i give you sugestion,right,soon or later you will ask to see how map look in 630x600 dimension,and these is what is required for Main Map Foundry.

alright, will do; thanks

Wow this is really unique, but i have some questions.
Will the poisening take a Bombard style effect or some other effect?
Also the outline of the teritories is not strong enough against the background.
Also can you explain exactly what is a "Badland"


Thanks, I'll make the boarders clearer. I ...