ok... i dont mean to be a bother, and i wnat to have this map come out as soon as possible. I just had a question about the inner wall2 and great hall boarder. Can the inner wall 2 attack the great hall 1,2, and 3? Or can it only attack inner hall 1? according to the current boarders, it can attack ...

Looking good. However i think Duluth should be a harbor territory.

Looks sweet. I was kinda dissapointed tho, i thought it would be a Great lakes map, not the great lakes and surounding land arieas. I think a good map could be just the great lakes, and no land areas. just a thought.

Hmmm...... i liked the ropes better, this looks too..... i dont know, strange. other than that i like it.

the explination for an allied army bonus is extremely comfusing

thats not all true. the part about adding only one territory is not true. you need to add at least 2 more to get another allied set. after that it starts growing faster.
say you have: demise, conflict, revelation. +2
now add one territory: charity, a second +2 (revelation, death, charity).

what ...

unless you scrued up the name, and its supposed to say, USA at Norway

im going to assume this, but i think USA wins game 303531 because norway hasnt shown up, and i assume USA was not suposed to join until norway joined.

It doesn't matter which way round you join, as long as it is in teams

Norway are waiting to play in game 303757


yea.... um thats not our ...

Yeah, we should just scrap the -1, he's completely right if someone rolls 5 adjacent they are in really bad shape, especially if the other players are smart enough not to bail them out. And we really don't know what negative armies would do to lack's systems. We also already dropped from +4 and +3 ...

i understand the tunnel change and I agree that something needs to be done, but i liked the simplicity of one entrance on either end. And you have to figure the game won't be as simple as whoever has the great hall has the outer walls - now whoever has teh out wall can just by-pass the inner walls ...

im going to assume this, but i think USA wins game 303531 because norway hasnt shown up, and i assume USA was not suposed to join until norway joined.

For the balance issue in tha camps, you could move the bridge that conects the river camp 1 and plains 7, to connect river camp 3 and plains 4. Then it is equal distance from the gate as the foarst camp, and the second exit is also the same as the other exit from the foarst camp.

so far im lovin this map. However, i dont like the nevitive armys (just my opinion, never liked them, on anny maps.)

I dont know, I guess it makes it a lot harder to dominate the map. wich is good for playability, but the games might take a long time.

I think the center circle, Reason, should ...

Im lovin this map. the only thing I have a problem with is the key. its a bit confusing. with the throne+ and the any camp+. can you clean it up a bit please.

and i dont know if this has been asked/answered, but are the contenents made up of the 4 colors that are solid? Or are the also consisting of the mixed colored territories, making 6 territorys for each?

are there only 3 allied symbols, and 2 ennamy symbols? and if there are more, how do we know what they are?

Wow, I think no matter what we do for that key people are going to be confused... Allied symbols are symbols connected by lines on the star. Law is just the example for the key. Enemy ...

agreed. If you made a map for that idea it could work, but this map is based on monopaly, not CC

are there only 3 allied symbols, and 2 ennamy symbols? and if there are more, how do we know what they are?

Can you post your updates throughout the thread. Makes it hard to follow the development of the map when you have to go back to the first post.

personaly i think it is easier to fallow the map if it is updated on the first page, then you dont have to go scroling throught all the pages, just to ...

woops, didnt read the "Things to do" lol o well, no harm done. at least we agree the watter needs an effect

lookin' good. I like the mirmaid, cuz thats a big part of Denmark. I sugjest getting a better watter effect, and change the flag. It looks out of place, to small or something, can't put my finger on it. The land itself could also be improved, but im not shure how. sorry for being so vauge. Good luck ...

I like this map, and can't wait to play it, i was just wondering, is 1 star= 1 troop?. If it is, you need to change that in your Bounuses per territory.

For me its all about Eye candy, and playability. I hate getting scrued over because of bad placement, but I also cant stand to play on a map that looks like shit.

the scandinavia map is SCANDINAVIA, not DENMARK. Thats like saying there is no point to have Europe as a map, its being represented in the classic map, and the World 2.0 map. Or a Germany map, because its being represented in the Europe map.

WTF? How did china win by USA forfiting? we didnt miss anny deadline. We are playing right now.