I could see the U.S. having a slight advantage being that Seaborg and Launch Code will be bombarded, allowing for an open road from the Bunker. This will come into play in foggy setting once its down to 2v2. Since you're starting your attack from a +2 autodeploy, you have a larger amount of troops ...

tec805 wrote:Roll lot's of 6's (check my sig)

So you're bummed you lost on a 4v2? It happens all the time! Shouldn't have gone for the second roll if you lose the first in a 4v2.

EDIT: Actually that would've had to be a 4v3, which doesn't hold a very good chance for the attacker.

Will do! Thanks.

Accused:

Hairy_Nipple and
KamikazeTadpole


The accused, specifically Hairy, are suspected of two things, the first being:

Overt verbal abuse.

Game number(s):

8737166
8789469
8712895

But you can pretty much just check any game he plays in.

The second being:

Secret Diplomacy/Multi ...

I agree with everything said above, but would like to add that if you constantly wait until you have 5 cards then your opponents will always expect you to be able to turn in a set on your next turn since you'll have no less than 3 cards at any time.

I know that I am far more likely to attack ...

Well, it's worthwhile to go for the Kurds. Their cities can't be attacked from loyalties and it's a good bonus to defense ratio. Also if you hold Tikrit then your two Kurdish cities are protected.

Which bonuses you go for initially will depend on what city(ies) you have, as the neutrals differ ...

Rynok and Orlovka are probably the first choice bonus for most players.


I find that if I can take the artillery position in the russian 64th then holding kuporosnoya isn't too much trouble. As long as you bulk up on where the plans can hit you. I've won a few games on this map starting with ...

Also just wanted to throw my two cents in on some imbalances in the map. I completely agree with the positioning of the witch. At least raise Noeh to +4. It doesn't help that you can directly attack from the witch to Noeh's Square, meaning it must be heavily defended.

These are the fair starting ...

Really. CHEERS! Just took my round of turns and had only one mistaken reinforcement, which is in fact quite good by my standards.

In This Thread:

Conquerclub finally puts forth an awesome update that many have been wanting for years, to a chorus of complaints.

Sure there are a few bugs, it is new. Reeeeeelax.

Thanks CC!

When the legend says that the AA Battery can bombard "close armor", what does that actually mean? how close do you have to be?

It's all owed to Falconet!

I know this is late in the stage to make this comment, but I feel like the map insert on this is waaaaay too big. Seems kind of silly to have the realy map and then another map that is only half it's size. Looks strange, but whatevs! I feel like it would be better with a list or a smaller less ...

Reverting to neutral always happens at the beginning of your turn.


Yes I understand that, but I think for this map The King should revert to neutral at the beginning of anyone's turn, not just the person that holds it. As I stated above, by it not reverting to neutral you are given the ability ...

I would never play this.

So don't have it available for new members. Seems like an easy enough answer.

I didn't read the whole thread and I apologize if this has already been brought up.

I just noticed that the King does not revert to 7 neutral at the end of the turn. Another player had attacked the king and then a castle the turn before mine and he still held the king territ with 1 of his troops ...

myfriendkyle & Falconet

I'm in, just need to confirm my partner.

Asia Please! IN

So does everyone think NA is the best option when holding Europe early in the game?

in!

Hey thanks!

If I by eliminating a player my spoils count goes up to five, and then I end my turn and receive a sixth spoil for a conquest, would I be forced to trade in after I've already ended my turn? or at the beginning of my next turn?

Just curious cause I'm new and this might happen in the game I'm ...