I vote for Bondra, always an honorable and wise player, to officiate. As you are familiar with both sites, it only seems fair. What do you say? Oh wait... What do BD and Lackattack say?
I have an account here and on WaW, but my loyalties are with WaW. No offense CC. I guess I just don't want to see Bondra playing for CC... you are right, he's VERY good.
vV
As for Bondra - I fear him as an opponent. He kicks butt I know. But I would NEVER disqualify him. He's too good to not ...
I like the idea, though I would like to see less cooperation amongst the players from each website. Though, if I were in a game and I had a choice to take a territory from a WaW or CC opponent, I'm sure I'd pick the CC player to attack.
I suggested in the WaW forums that to keep things lively ...
I think the winner of the tournament should win 1 free month of premie on each site. That will be an incentive (perhaps) for the games to be a free-for-all, instead of team games in disguise.
As Bondra is active on both, I believe he is exempt from the tourney. Sorry B, no offense. At least, that is my understanding. If The Glorious Leaders feel otherwise, then who am I to say no?
If they do decide, then you should probably play for CC, as they will need the help.
If you CC folks want to play a freaking insane game, go to WaW and start a sequential, standard fortification (1 army move at the end), fog, CMD (cards of mass destruction), card type 4 (each set gives a random number of armies from 3 to 10), using the Castle map.
I've been playing World at War for about four years now and am hopelessly addicted. I think BD's (as we affectionately call Blue Dragon) idea is fantastic! I don't think I'd qualify to be on the Best of World at War team (though, I did get a few votes for best player in our 4th annual ego boost ...