How could the proposition exist a priori... what.

Meanings and ideas only exist as human interpretations. So they can't pre-exist themselves.

I count 9 + the site owner thread.

I'm pleased to have made such an impact in such a short time.

Sorry, your link's broken.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/n ... 682710.stm

I'm moving there soon. I'll keep you posted on how awesome it is (and how attractively thin the citizens all are).

I don't know if anyone has proof.

Fuсk the BNP.

(Although to be fair, they don't give a shit about freedom of the press. Which is refreshing.)

It's even sadder, because 239 years ago the Tea Party's violence was at least aimed at people outside of its own country.

Now it is just a self-destructive force like the Taleban or Occupy.

No one's stopping you from abstaining from sex in order to give blood. Your inability to resist your animal urges is not society's fault.

Pros:
Better accents and nicer suits.
Lighter tax burden on high earners.
Less whiny.
More old school. Less PC.
Don't like the unions.
Innate sense of superiority.
Hotter female MPs.

Cons:
A slightly excessive amount are ex-boarding school perverts.

Very little, as far as I'm aware. Same underlying principle.

rosa parks

How's this for a demotivational 'poster':

[player]Woodruff[/player]

Saxi no doubt has some obscure and moderately inaccurate/misquoted fact, chosen purely because it fits his idea of a world in which the US snidely undermines everyone else and Europe loses heavily as a result.

qwert wrote:US leave Iraq.because iraq dont want to sign threaty where US soldiers will be protected from any criminal prosecution.

I'm going to have to ask you to reference that one.

I beat a former Conqueror 1v1?

So happy.

Fitz, are you one of these people who considers themselves entitled to 'rights'?

Political jokes aren't funny. They're just an opportunity to laugh and in doing so force your political view on everyone else in the room, without explicitly doing so.

The absence of any universally held values of 'good' or 'bad'.
The inconsistency of any society's moral code.
The impossibility of any 'answer' to life being applicable to all humans.

Things only have the meaning that we perceive them to have.

Well according to the poll, the SNES and abortion are our clear winners.

Would it be cheaper to go to poor areas and give out PS3s or abortions?

I was more interested in the underlying emotion than the words which lay on the surface.

I'm a people person.

I am 95% happy with my standard of living.
The Conservatives have 310 MPs in the House of Commons.
The majority of rapists are known to their victims prior to the attack.

If it is as innocent as that, the Britishers will have no objection to surrendering all oil rights to the surrounding ocean in exchange for keeping the rocks. They won't so they'll have to deal with having them taken away. Life isn't always fair. That will be a valuable lesson the Falklanders can ...

I think the final sentence is all that's relevant.

My standard of living is sweet so IDC.