I was talking about bigger games.

The 1 vs 1 game was just me trying something new. I now realize that it is a really stupid game that simply measures who can spend more time on the internet clicking refresh, or can afford to wake up at weird hours to play in the middle of the night to avoid the ...

Why isn't there a freestyle mode that doesn't let other players gank you in the middle of your turn? So anyone can take their turn any time, but once a player has started their turn, nobody else can play at the same time and mess with them.

I had a 1 vs 1 Freestyle game where I was winning pretty solidly with SA held under 8 armies. The other guy disappears for 20 hours, and then takes his turn. I take my turn 2 hours later, and right in the middle, he jumps in, grabs some key territory, and ends his turn, before I end mine, giving him ...

With escalading cards there should never be a "stalemate."

I've had it happen. You just have to make it through the unstable 10-30 period without any major powers attacking each other or hoarding large amounts of cards. After that you quickly get into the hundreds of armies where an additional 60 ...

The key thing is your understanding of the game. Armies are power, territory is not. Territories are a liability, they have to be defended, they spread you thin. They are only worthwhile if their payout covers their cost, and often it doesn't, because as soon as you have a bonus, people want to ...

Just attacked 9 vs 1 and lost all my armies: