yeah i guess making coments doesn't help much once the map is designed as it just becomes a defense course of course the creator has every right. for example, you like the microsot approach to legends, i like the apple approach; who is to say who is right accept looking at play stats
a. big logos are tacky and irrelevant to a map. so in my map example i de-emphasized them without removing them
b. map size is an issue as constant scrolling sux on big maps with lots of moving. so i present an alternative on my map example to constrict all the pertinent info to one ...
All Your Money Are Belong To Us v D&D National Bank
All Your Money and D&D National tie, game currently in round 14 they got us in the islands but we were able to stall them out like the greedy whores we are!
maybe we need to first define the problem or problems, like What is Point Inflation? seems people view it differently or think some abuses or gaming of the system is inflation related. maybe a different term is needed
i don't see anything wrong with both sides of the argument
for one, the tourney rules were clear, even if they don't seem fair to some, or end up not seeming fair to some after certain type of play. nothing is ever fair to everyone
on the other hand, players have a right to offer constructive ...
your going to resend invitations to some people as my mailbox was flooded with autorplies or sends or whatever, and the invitation was buried in 30 msgs that all looked the same
most people will just delete all 30 msgs without hunting in each msgs that looks near identical for their game number
ya just gotta feed the addiction and help the site out with a prem membership, it works out to like a nickel a day basically, which is nothing, and most play everyday; you'll enjoy having numerous games going and not having to be picky about joining games waiting for them to fill up