Aaaaaaaaaaand....

Does CC REALLY have to deal with people so stupid they would use the same name and just change the numbers like that :o

My respect for task faced by the hunters goes up....

It has happened. If I had access still I could give you an example, but i'm sure a hunter can...
LOL ...

Aaaaaaaaaaand....

Does CC REALLY have to deal with people so stupid they would use the same name and just change the numbers like that

My respect for task faced by the hunters goes up....

LOOOL :o Evening all.

i just got alerted to this post. figured I'd chime in. i've been a CC member since Feb 07, both premium and freemium, and I think if you look at the way my ranking has gone up and down you'll see I REALLY just play for love of a game I learnt to love as a kid :D

I dont know ...

Guys, my apologies for the missed turns. I have been on safari for my best mates wedding, and relying on African broadband. (Though the last two rounds have not been ideal, as those that have played through them will testify)

I hope everyone can believe that I didn't play through 6 months of this ...

TtD wrote:Viker now 40+ points back from the leader, pretty much dead in the water courtesy of playing spoiler early in a lot of maps.

...

What are the scores looking like by your method?

Cheers

Thanks JoJo for running the tourney.

OK... well, If I have understood everything correctly:

*NEW RULE: If the game is not over by the end of round 25, I will record your scores for the tournament by number of troops if there is no fog. If there is fog, everyone left will receive the average of the points left.

Group Y (3/4 games ...

Scores updated as of August 10th @ 1935hrs.

Well it's all but official the finalists for mike group are

Lisbon101

Jondalar

Vikermac

Colson

Congrats and good luck in the final round.
To all my fellow warriors in Mike group, thanks for a great round!! - Definitely one of the closest I have ...

colson wrote:Now I am completely confused by the scoring as the "official" scoring is something way different. I don't know who to attack in these final games.

And I would query the scoring of the objective wins too...

i scored like u colson, but that rule has to be clear to the final round

This is what it says in the rules:

Scoring in an Objective Game were someone wins by objective
Winner 10 points
All Othes 4 points
Obviously winning by objective would be a good thing in a close race

Surely that means that ...

i scored like u colson, but that rule has to be clear to the final round

This is what it says in the rules:

Scoring in an Objective Game were someone wins by objective
Winner 10 points
All Othes 4 points
Obviously winning by objective would be a good thing in a close race

Surely that means that ...

how did u score europe 1914, colson?

I scored it 10 for me and 6 for you and the other player left on the board once the objective was met. The rest were 5-1 depending on how they finished.
I dont think thats right - have a look at the way the points were scored in Alpha group game 28
Game ...

Vikermac wrote:I think we should compromise, just move me up so the other points don't matter as much.

LMAO! I was hoping for the same - show me the points that send me off to bed feeling like I still have a chance!

did we sort out the difference in scores?

So are you counting "guaranteed" wins also, or just scored ones? I have a real time spreadsheet and it's way off from yours too .
The way I normally score is minimum points already obtained ( So if its a non-objective game, and there are already 4 people eliminated, I score everyone left at 5 ...

So are you counting "guaranteed" wins also, or just scored ones? I have a real time spreadsheet and it's way off from yours too .
The way I normally score is minimum points already obtained ( So if its a non-objective game, and there are already 4 people eliminated, I score everyone left at 5 ...

My scoring is real time... so for instance if 3 people are eliminated from a game they get 1,2 and 3 points... I give the remaining players 4 points (as all remaining players can't get any less than 4 points). That is much better scoring version than getting 0 points until the game is over. Under ...

Does anyone have updated scores for Mike group?
Cheers

Vikermac wrote:

danryan wrote:By the way, Colson pulled off the first objective win I've seen in any of my groups, on Europe 1914. Per the rules he scored 10 and all others got 4.

Which sucks cause I would have had third at least!

Nice!


I think that worked for me!

Does that apply to the deadbeats too?

Updated.

Cheers JoJo

Seems like there is a slight error in the score:

Group X (3/4 games completed)
Jondalar - 18
dustin800 - 22
Moneymatt - 2
Arrakis - 22

I should be on 24 after 3/4 games - I should have gotten double points for my map.(5011413)

I have the final scores calculated as:

Group ...

I'm just doing mine for in depth analysis Dazoot, and to a bit greater depth as I count all points secured, not just points from finished games, so same as last round i'll be updating every few days with the qualifying chances for my group and a bit of commentary(player x needs y amounts of points ...

I just got a pm from astrowaro. He just got a new job and cannot play that many games. You guys need to find us a replacement for our group...india.
Looks like Grape Ape is up then...

Alls well that ends well



Grape Ape it is... See I can see the future. Games have been sent to him.
Yip ...

chemefreak wrote:I just got a pm from astrowaro. He just got a new job and cannot play that many games. You guys need to find us a replacement for our group...india.

Looks like Grape Ape is up then...

Alls well that ends well

Perhaps if you don't want to "overpay"---play those 8 months as if they were a year. Think you'd play 500 games in a year? Play 500 games in those 8 months. You'll get your money's worth then.

Premium Membership is wonderful, because it's up to you how much value you want to get out of it. If you ...

How many points generally puts you through this round?

I figured at the start of the round a target of 380 would be definite...
based on an equal share of the points, (8x10 pts, 8x7pts ,..., 8x1 pt)
But if you talking absolute minimum you'd need to skew that for the players that do really badly ...