How does that explain you mis quoting me?

Want to explain that owenshooter?

Bandit, thank you, still do not get Tigers move but as he has not made a comment cannot condemn you for it. Perhaps as you play a lot together and he was not in a winning position he thought he would do you a favour.
Hope we can both put this behind us and move on.

Oh yes, forgot to mention that Tiger and Bandit play a lot of two player games together. Not a crime I know but clearly have some connection.

Really can not believe this report. Is there any sanctions to stop players making spurious reports? In this game I was attacked suspiciously by Tiger and raised it in chat. Formandy also was suspicious of Tiger and Bandit, we both reduced borders to concentrate on the two players whom we suspected ...

Tried to make my peace, have not received rating from him yet. Tried to be as honest as possible when I rated him, he is a good player, we just fell out over his attacks on me my strong reprisal. I did not like the abusive chat after our disagreement but he did later apologise for that.

Still ...

My initial post was a question. The other player said it was common but I had never come across it. I now accept that to some players it is implied. So will always make it clear in future agreements that I do not accept it, personally I believe it is up to the person wanting to attack to make sure ...

Wasn't hasty, thought a lot about it, but based on how he had played the game so far, attacking someone because they put troops on his border for one, I determined that if I hit him, I would have to hit him hard. My post was to determine whether in other players opinion "peace until the end game ...

Thanks all for your opinions.

Clearly the lesson learned by me it to be clear, the problem is I don't think the other player will ever except his part in the misunderstanding, won't change and will continuing abusing people who dare to have a different perspective.

Oh well, I value my reputation ...

Game number is 14513815.

Thanks but now confused, I have never come across this before. If I have peace with an ally it is tactical, we were both taking out an opponent and it was a bit of a land grab, I took two provinces to prevent my ally from getting a bonus to enhance my end game chances against him, but now you are ...

In a recent game another player offered me 'peace till the end, last two standing'. I accepted as one player looked like running away with it and I gained some territory as well. Later in the game my ally took two provinces from me without prior agreement and as the player was aggressive I took the ...

Playing my first game on this map and thoroughly enjoying it, however at a key moment in the game did not see the river between Sukhothai and Uttaradit. This meant I left a player alive with one troop in Uttaradit and 5 spoils. This being escalating spoils, taking it would have won me the game (I ...