Accused:

NonBolhaCat14jb
twoeggsandham24


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis


Game number(s):

2049581


Comments:
NonBolhaCat14jb is playing red and chooses to attack me and break my bonus, no problem there. But he then goes into chat to encourage another player to ...

However, thought I'd just make a couple of points:

1) Original rules of risk are actually escalating cards ;)

2) Whilst there is probably some element of rank protection in playing private games, I know for myself and the majority of high rankers who I know and play with, the main reason for ...

Firstly, I agree wholeheartedly with the basic premise of the original post but not his sentiments.

The majority of high ranked players play games types that protect their points and avoid types that are more likely to result in defeat and or heavier points loss.

My basis for this is that I have ...

Count me in please.

Go to the addons section, in the list of addons there is one called dice analyiser, install it (you need Greasemonkey for it to work I think) You will then get a new link on the left menu for the analyser. You need to play a few games for it to gather the stats, then when you click the link it will ...

It seems you must be very very unlucky or that you are exageratting your results.

Do you have dice anayliser installed? If so you should be able to get all the stats you need from there, that will give you the ACTUAL % of time you have won certain battles, plus the proper probability that you ...

Whilst I have never done it I dont see the problem in it.

I'd be either but human pref.

Thanks

The odds of winning 3 vrs 1 is 75%

nope. Its below 75% since when dices are equal; you still lose....

Nope it is 75%, believe me I have a cunning risk probablity calculator.

Just shut the f*ck up, have you tried the real dice 3 vs 1, it's not fucking 75% and in this corrupted cunt game it can ...

P4Ssoa wrote:

Moosegun wrote:The odds of winning 3 vrs 1 is 75%

nope. Its below 75% since when dices are equal; you still lose....

Nope it is 75%, believe me I have a cunning risk probablity calculator.

The odds of winning 3 vrs 1 is 75%

No Sgt Rock, I understand what you are saying. But you are wrong. I will put money that if you fight 1000 3 vrs 3 battles, the attacker will win 1 in 5 of them, approx 200 battles. Because they are the odds and the dice are modelled to mirror real dice.

You are suggesting that is not the case.

My ...

My gut feeling is that it will happen around 20% of the time, (or whatever the actual prob. is) and I would be willing to put cash on that.

nuh uh :roll:

No not 'nuh uh' at all. The point is that you and the OP are arguing about the randomness of the dice using 3 vrs 3 as the basis of your ...

We should start a game where only 3 vs 3 attacks are made. Just pile all of your other troops on an out of the way territory and lets see how many times the attacker wins. Regardless of the odds, it should happen.

My gut tells me it will be a rarity far below what the odds suggest success should ...

Oh man, that is just hilarious.

What possible advantage could cheating in this way bring to one player over the others?

The claim is that by creating new player accounts, and then letting them deadbeat you gain the advantage as you KNOW that they are not going to attack you, so you can take some ...

SGT. ROCK wrote:The op asked if anyone has won a 3 vs 3. Have you?

No, because statistically in a 3 vrs 3 battle the attackers only has a 20% chance of victory, SO I NEVER PLAY THOSE ODDS.

I get the feeling I am going to have to keep this simple.

Firstly 3 vrs 3 is not an even battle, you only have 2 attacking dice and the defender gets 2 defensive dice. Due to the fact that in the case of a draw the defender wins the chances of a 3 vrs 3 win is limited, this is why NO player that is ...

Hi,

I was quite happily playing a game the other day (7 players on classic), it was taking it's time because there are not just 1 but 2 new players that have decided to deadbeat without taking a turn.

All of a sudden one of the other players types in chat that he suspects one of us is cheating ...

Suspect users: oddball1405 and BuckeyeAce

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=895810

Comments: I could be wrong it might just be extremely poor play but Buckeye (blue) has held Africa for the whole game and yet I dont think he has attempted to break Oddball (green) in South ...

An absolute YES from me

I agree that the current system can create very uneven games, where some players are spread all over the place (although it can be fun to try and fight these positions). I think if it was an additional option, implemented as suggested it would definately work and not cause ...

So how was I to know this was an RT game?? Just because someone decided to type RT at the beginning?? I had never played RT before and didnt know I was joining an RT game?

Prehaps if the other three players worked a bit more on their tactics and less on simply trying to finish quickly I wouldnt ...

I am a bit confused, I have been playing CC for about two days. I have just finished a very quick four player game in which the other players were accusing me of cheating? They were saying that I was cheating because it was freestyle rt?? and I was always the one that was finishing last?!? I have no ...

Hi, my first post so thought I should make it a long one!

The Newbies Point of View

I am a true newbie, I am currently about 2 rounds into my first four games. My first opinion of CC it that is a great idea and something I will not only carry on with but probably join as a PM.

My first ...