pessoal! e os romenos? nao se esqueçam dos romenos!! tecnicamente...

eu nem sequer sei se há romenos no cc mas tb haviam de curtir de participar

my eyes hurt! wtf just happened!!??!?!?! mid turn, as well.

I wonder if it is possible / if someone can create a greasemonkey script that replaces this horrid peace of shit (hope i'm not offending the creator) for the original/previous one

The problem with this, is there are ways around a filter. For instance if someone wanted to say f*ck (notice the filter), they could type fcuk or fvck and people would still understand what they mean, but the filter would not catch those. Also, how would you say assassin, this would come up as ...

Headlines

You can attach descriptive tags to a rating. This should let a rating communicate more about the player without opening up the door to all that abusive language and nonsense we've seen with written feedback. The initial list of 35 tags is sure to evolve, so please share your ...

Thing is, at least in my opinion, in the feedback system, people left feedback when they had something to say. Now, I'd even go so far as saying some people are rating compulsively, not because the other user struck them in some way, and this detracts from the relevance of having such a system. Or ...

If you are going to have it be "editable" for 5 days, should the rating appear in those 5 days, or should it remain hidden like the original rating does?

that's a very good question. I guess it could be visible, since there's not going to be any retaliatory feedback to a response.

I just rated my opponent quick, slow, talkative, and silent. Thanks for the helpful tag upgrades.
Seriously? You complain about the system and then go straight for abusing it? You aren't proving a point, you do realize that, right?
[...]
erm... actually, he is. If he can do it, anyone else can ...

by ctgottapee on Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:09 am

[...]
AND the comments have to come back; [...]
reduce the comment size to prevent the diatribes , allow rebuttal comments, and moderate them the same way you moderate forum posts, based on the content and not the relevance.

simple and to the point. i ...

maique, there was an intentional move away from "bad, neutral, good" for various reasons. There has been some discussion in the community consultation of moving back towards that, so head on over there and see what's been said and add your voice!

Thanks for the info Twill, but i had already read ...

Thanks for the update lackattack, it's getting better.

As for the scale, here's what I think:

The scale should be cut down to 3 - positive, neutral and negative (wonder where i got that from...) or good, neutral, bad (notice how i don't use the word average). As another user said, you can think ...

First off, I liked the old feedback system, but understand the problems with moderation, particularly having been in a moderated dispute myself which kept going back and forth.

I understand (at least what seemed to me to be) the sudden shift from the feedback system to the star system. An automated ...

i know for a fact they are not the same player and am equally certain they are each playing their own game and each playing to win. no cheating, i'm sure, just tactics. they're both fair, if they didn't declare anything, there's no secret alliance.

i know for a fact they are not the same player and am equally certain they are each playing their own game and each playing to win. no cheating, i'm sure, just tactics. they're both fair, if they didn't declare anything, there's no secret alliance.