getting an inactive player to L-2 won't do much. my guess is they'll all continue to be inactive. as stated in my last post of D1, my suspicion now is going to those that prevented a King lynch. we need to look carefully at why votes were wasted when we clearly had one player who was suspicious at ...
I find it funny that this time I probably will be killed for being to talkative, in other game I have gotten tons of warning for being too silent.
I try to be active, and people jump on me and let Sonic manipulate the killing of one of the strongest strategic brains they have in town, yeah maybe ...
Didn't see Homer's post. Thought I would've been FP'ed, but no...
@Homer, what is Traf if King flips town or scum respectively?
my feeling about traf is that he's scum. maybe i'm wrong and this is his usual D1 play style. but i remember that game we had with the arsonist... traf was not quiet ...
a vote for inactive players gives us nothing. even if we get lucky and hit scum, there's nothing in it that helps us identify other scum. hjelp - you didn't want to quote in your post. but how does finding out whether cofari is town/scum tell us what kingm is?
check back a couple of games, when i sub in, yeah I was scum, but I was kind of spot on with reads on who was mafia, and I bet I can do that this game to)..
was there something special about this game? because for scum to have spot on reads on who is mafia doesn't seem like much of a flex ...
check back a couple of games, when i sub in, yeah I was scum, but I was kind of spot on with reads on who was mafia, and I bet I can do that this game to)..
was there something special about this game? because for scum to have spot on reads on who is mafia doesn't seem like much of a flex to me ...
A) Ragian has tunneled one player extremely hard (me) while completely ignoring five lurkers → that contradiction is alignment-indicative. Ragian has by far the clearest scum-tells: extreme D1 tunnel + ignoring lurkers while claiming he wants general discussion, matching ...
Sonic and Ragian can either be both town or one of them are scum, but they are not both scum, as scum would probably know their scum partners. Some would say it is some kind of tactic for both of them to go for each other as scum partners so we think as per my first statement. I doubt that as they ...
... The reason I want you to fully claim is that we should only have a limited number of claims each day lest we hand scum a buffet of roles to pick from when deciding on whom to nightkill. Softclaiming hijacks town's ability to choose who should claim. Therefore, you should claim fully now that ...
wow, a lot happen in the last two days. glad to see though that i'm not the only one coming back after the weekend feeling like i missed a lot.
my last post was saying that Hjelp was pushing too hard about sonic's soft claim. ostensibly, that puts me on sonic's side at that point. but re-thinking ...
What has happened to this site? Whenever I hit the "take me to the last unread post" or whatever that button is called, I get to the end and have to scroll back to find out where I left off. It's annoying. It might, however, just be something that I'm doing wrong. Anyone?
I do not at all understand the suspicion of DJF. And I agree with Annie - whether ok or not - that Son!c having "strong" suspects this early raises an eyebrow. Either for him being way to inflated or wanting to seem town too much.
@homer, I bet you that if a PR is forced to claim D1, scum will ...
i don't see a no lynch day one as just handing the first move to scum. if we target a townie with a role and they're forced to make a claim, that gives scum a good target to hit. without knowing the actual numbers, i'd say it's about 50-50 that scum hit someone vanilla if they don't get that sort of ...
i assumed all the votes up to now were just jokes and the game would "officially" start once all have confirmed.
i see the argument for a D1 lynch. but unless someone stands out, i would rather not take the risk of accidentally lynching a power role townie for the sake of feeling we need to do ...