Moderator: Community Team
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
But with not that many people, it's easy to get the accidental lynch or end the day earlier than we want to. You of all should know that really well... Unless town's interests are not parallel to yoursedocsil wrote:Just keeping the conversation going until someone says something stupid. That is the sole task of a townie D1.
This:edocsil wrote:Just keeping the conversation going until someone says something stupid. That is the sole task of a townie D1.
And I'd say you've been doing quite the job of keeping the discussion going. You've been vote-hopping all game.Commander9 wrote:To be fair, barely anyone's posting and it's no fun to talk to yourself.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Yeah, I have to agree, Commander, you really haven't vote hopped this game.Commander9 wrote:I voted 2 different people? The hell with misstating facts and trying to divert attention?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I think you are joking here? Sax does mean tomorrow as in the 11th not D2.DoomYoshi wrote:If we wait until tomorrow, it won't help us figure out who is about to be lynched on Day 1... by then it will be too late. I def don't want a No-lynch but I don't want to bandwagon and seem like mafia either... what is there for a townie to do? playing on the mafia team is so much easier lol
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I quoted you to state my opinion. The post was directed at edoc. It was intended to read something like this:Commander9 wrote:I voted 2 different people? The hell with misstating facts and trying to divert attention?
Apologies for the confusion.pancakemix wrote:To be fair, barely anyone's posting and it's no fun to talk to yourself.edocsil wrote:Just keeping the conversation going until someone says something stupid. That is the sole task of a townie D1.
And I'd say you've been doing quite the job of keeping the discussion going. You've been vote-hopping all game.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Nothing that I know.edocsil wrote:I think you are joking here? Sax does mean tomorrow as in the 11th not D2.DoomYoshi wrote:If we wait until tomorrow, it won't help us figure out who is about to be lynched on Day 1... by then it will be too late. I def don't want a No-lynch but I don't want to bandwagon and seem like mafia either... what is there for a townie to do? playing on the mafia team is so much easier lol
A question of flavor. Is the Albarezzi a fiction of Sax's or is there some real world connection?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Yea, I thought that that statement would have been more appropriate aimed at me. So joke voting and promoting discussion D1 is bad now? I was certainly bouncing all over the place while joking, but now with you I am deadly serious.pancakemix wrote:I quoted you to state my opinion. The post was directed at edoc. It was intended to read something like this:Commander9 wrote:I voted 2 different people? The hell with misstating facts and trying to divert attention?
Apologies for the confusion.pancakemix wrote:To be fair, barely anyone's posting and it's no fun to talk to yourself.edocsil wrote:Just keeping the conversation going until someone says something stupid. That is the sole task of a townie D1.
And I'd say you've been doing quite the job of keeping the discussion going. You've been vote-hopping all game.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Why not lynch vic or drabod over no posting much? Well first off it gets boring after doing that 5 games in a row, and they also are not actively lurking, they simply are not here often. You posted a response to your accusation quite rapidly given the length of time to your previous post. Also could you clarify what you mean about the vote hopping? I think I may have misunderstood. I was saying that jumping around and keeping discussion going with mostly nonsensical joke votes was a good thing D1. Do you feel differently?pancakemix wrote:But why so serious? I'm being called out needlessly on not responding to an argument that didn't even pertain to me but got me voted anyway. Therefore it must be my fault that the thread died twice in a week, hmm? Why aren't you harassing Victor and drabod, who have 2 posts between them?
As for the vote hopping, it's got about as much foundation as your argument against me,
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Me personally, I think 1 joke vote is enough or the joke vote phase gets dragged out unnecessarily. That said, spiesr's pr intrigues me as it may imply possible third party roles.edocsil wrote:Why not lynch vic or drabod over no posting much? Well first off it gets boring after doing that 5 games in a row, and they also are not actively lurking, they simply are not here often. You posted a response to your accusation quite rapidly given the length of time to your previous post. Also could you clarify what you mean about the vote hopping? I think I may have misunderstood. I was saying that jumping around and keeping discussion going with mostly nonsensical joke votes was a good thing D1. Do you feel differently?pancakemix wrote:But why so serious? I'm being called out needlessly on not responding to an argument that didn't even pertain to me but got me voted anyway. Therefore it must be my fault that the thread died twice in a week, hmm? Why aren't you harassing Victor and drabod, who have 2 posts between them?
As for the vote hopping, it's got about as much foundation as your argument against me,

virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.



aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Ok, so 4 votes by edocsil. However, I think all of them are joke votes. Either way, I don't think you can accuse anyone of vote hopping day 1. Bandwagoning sure, OMGUSing yes, but not votehopping unless we had an unusually productive Day 1.pancakemix wrote:I did not accuse commander of vote hopping, I said that post was directed at edoc. Reread plz.
No one has given me any reason to respond to the joke case (I repeat, joke case) on commander (after which I received a vote? WTF?) and suddenly everyone's super cereal. I THINK I'm at -1, so I'll claim if it's requested, but hold off on the lynch at least for now, please.

Does that mean I can call you all on bandwagoning? This case is incredibly flimsy.safariguy5 wrote:Ok, so 4 votes by edocsil. However, I think all of them are joke votes. Either way, I don't think you can accuse anyone of vote hopping day 1. Bandwagoning sure, OMGUSing yes, but not votehopping unless we had an unusually productive Day 1.pancakemix wrote:I did not accuse commander of vote hopping, I said that post was directed at edoc. Reread plz.
No one has given me any reason to respond to the joke case (I repeat, joke case) on commander (after which I received a vote? WTF?) and suddenly everyone's super cereal. I THINK I'm at -1, so I'll claim if it's requested, but hold off on the lynch at least for now, please.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.