finished chalenges
DEVB vs NEM 23-27 [48]
cc2:ID vs TFFS 17-24 [46]
cc2:DEVB vs BPB 18-23 [38]
TNC vs 1RFG 23-19 [37]
cc2:AOC vs TFFS 26-15 [33]
cc2:EMP vs NEM 30-11 [31]
cc2:TSM vs AFOS 24-17 [37]
cc2:THOTA vs BPB 24-17 [31]
------------------------------------
new start
MM vs WLDG
LEG vs AOD
DEVB vs PIG
cc2:KORT vs FOED
cc2:THOTA vs AOC
cc2:TSM vs LOW
TNC vs LOTZ
------------------------
update board
added to board-
DYN vs OSA 35-25 [54]
GRIM vs RISK 28-13 [41]
AKA vs TNC 22-18 [37]
OSA vs BSS 27-33 [57]
cc2:KORT vs G1 24-17 [28]
RISK vs LOTZ 26-15 [31]
VDLL vs AKA 22-19 [40]
new activated chalenges
KOA vs OHIO
cc2:TOFU vs EMP
GRIM vs MYT
ID vs G1
add to table
cl3: IA vs TSM 10-9 [18]
GRIM vs KOA 21-27 [50]
cc2:TOFU vs BOFM 22-19 [32]
TNC vs MYT 27-33 [56]
---------------------------
new active
TNC vs PIG
What I'd like to know about this ranking, is how much of an effect the end score has on it? It seems to me it's just a simple win/loss calculation over amount of games? Rather than the actual score between the 2. So for example, I wouldn't expect bofm to lose as many points when they're already playing 13v2 in score. Sometimes you can mostly tell which team will win a contest, does that mean it's not worth playing in, when it's still up in the air how close you can get to victory?
Spoiler
#27
Nobody has a higher score or more medals with less games completed My Dispatch Interview
What I'd like to know about this ranking, is how much of an effect the end score has on it? It seems to me it's just a simple win/loss calculation over amount of games? Rather than the actual score between the 2. So for example, I wouldn't expect bofm to lose as many points when they're already playing 13v2 in score. Sometimes you can mostly tell which team will win a contest, does that mean it's not worth playing in, when it's still up in the air how close you can get to victory?""
i hope that im ehplane to you in PM.
Lubawski wrote:I like how this system encourages farming, especially of new clans.
That's one of the reasons we moved away from a ELO ranking long ago.
Then stop looking at it, you clearly have not moved away from it if you keep following it... And we are a new clan, are we suppose to farm old clans to be worthy?
farming? You want to say that Pack(new formed clan) are play against most weak clans here like GRIM-BSS-OSA?
You need to give more explanation how its these farming? Who PACK need to defeat so that these not be considered farming?
Your clan are in 3rd position, and you can easily change board , just take chalenge against PACK, and prove that you are better, quite simple.Its not nice to call all these clans are worthless.
actualy nobody have ranking related only to 2011 years-all other ranking are related on acumulated results from all chalenges and all years.
Ofcourse you dont think that Chuuck or Blitzaholic ranking are acurated,because they not use any results only people feels abouth clans.
Farang say something,when he get free time to create hes board related on 2011,so then we will compare results.
This system is great since it mimics the individual elo already in place and tells us just about as much as those little icons next to our names.
Having said that you cannot discredit the pack for making some waves. Sure they weren't formed in tge scrap heap of an old clan bit is that any reason to not respect them and what they've done. They've beaten everyone willing to challenge them.
Lubawski wrote:I like how this system encourages farming, especially of new clans.
That's one of the reasons we moved away from a ELO ranking long ago.
Lol at everyone from the pack jumping on him got this comment.. what he is trying to say i believe is that it would be easy to move up in the rankings for known top clans to take on weaker clans... the pack is obliviously not ur average new clan.. you guys have done very well, congrats on ur win..
finished chalenges-OSa 3 consecutive defeat. Minus 120 points
GRIM vs TLW 35-25 [55]
IGF vs TNC 18-23 [45]
RISK vs OSA 24-17 [39]
nc:OSA vs PACK 18-25 [40]
nc:GRIM vs OSA 25-18 [41]
new activated chalenges
AKA vs 1RFG
LEG vs BOFM
BSS vs MYT
finished
MM vs TLW 25-35 [72]
RISK vs AKA 23-25 [52]
LOTZ vs OSA 18-23 [33]
DBC vs TFFS 16-24 [30]
TNC vs LOTZ 22-18 [35]
new activated
acc:KOA vs DYN
acc:OHIO vs 1RFG
acc:TNC vs LEG
acc:OSA vs PIG
acc:AFOS vs AKA
acc:SOH vs LOTZ
acc:RISK vs AOD
acc:TFFS vs BSS
acc:MDR vs GRIM
finished chalenges
cc2:THOTA vs AOC 35-26 [57]
cc2:TSM vs LOW 40-21 [58]
cc2:TOFU vs EMP 21-40 [64]
ID vs G1 22-27 [60]
TNC vs PIG 15-28 [42]
new activated
IA vs PACK
AKA vs GRIM
acc:1RFG vs AOD
acc:PIG vs AOC
acc:BSS vs DYN
acc:SOH vs BOFM
acc:MM vs NEM
acc:AFOS vs FOED
TNC vs BSS
ID vs TNC
HH vs MDR
ID vs TLW
BOFM vs OSA
--------------------
acc its trouble for calculation,because mine formula its multiple with number of games,and scores in Acc its totaly diferent when you look number of played games. need to figure what to do.