Moderator: Community Team
DoomYoshi wrote:I cut out all the unneccesary stuff above. Part of sg's argument is that "but since has blake has more votes". That's shameless bandwagoning in an attempt to seem unsuspicious. I realize that in sg's mind he is voting for the specific act (vote unvote on AoG). But that specific act was based on blake's attempt to bandwagon in order to seem unsuspicous. It gets a bit convoluted there, but it makes sense I swearfreezie wrote:It wasn't the same logic..Shield is talking about the quick l-1/unvote from blake..Which does seem scummy when you look at it.DoomYoshi wrote:Here you used the same logic that blake used. So you are voting for him for doing exactly the same thing you did by voting for him?shieldgenerator7 wrote:I see the AoG BW has died down. I still think AoG may be scum, but since blake has more votes, and I also think he's scum from my previous argument,
Unvote Vote Blake

Okay but this is precisely what some others have tried to explain. We're looking for motivations, what reasoning and posts the players use to further their agendas. To rely on the happenstance cop investigation for D2 leads only diminishes town's winning chances (and honestly is dull). I know that you don't like that, I remember you suggested similar, very cautious stuff when you played before your last ban, but really D1 lynching a townie isn't that bad. In fact, it gives us evidence about who participated in the lynch.AoG wrote:And no DY, I can't think of a better person to lynch, because you guys are literally going off nothing.
hehe. Don't worry I'm contemplating my next chess move as I'm typing this.freezie wrote:Also, I beleive Tail should be prodded..He hasn't said anything since I beleive page 2.
ooh. I like where this is going. Can I buy you a drink?DoomYoshi wrote:A bit about myself: I play mafia Fast and Hard. I type Fast and Hard.
I can't deny that this is a possible explanation. The truth is more mundane, though.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:AoG wrote:For example, MeDeFe's case on DoomYoshi jumped out at me. Not that the case itself was poor of quality or anything like that (honestly I'll have to read more into the DY-MeDeFe exchange), but rather the timing. It was an opportune time for someone to make a case on Doom since he was on the BW and AoG had claimed. I could see someone clever like MeDeFe waiting until that silly BW died down and use posts by one of those spearheading the BW to build a case. I know this is pure speculation and meta, so I won't even bother placing a vote or fos, but I think this serves as an example of how there are always motives behind others' posts.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
the universe is one big chain of events. i believe nothing is independent. in hindsight i should've kept my mouth shut, you puny humans will never understand.DoomYoshi wrote:WHAT? Are you saying that since I was scum in last game, I can't be scum in this one? I like to think those events are independent... although perhaps I need to take more Stats classes;)
I feel like you just served us a meal of insults and a desert of summary. I don't see much substance in this post that hasn't been said already. Does the underlined part mean you are not human and possibly robot scum?00iCon wrote:the universe is one big chain of events. i believe nothing is independent. in hindsight i should've kept my mouth shut, you puny humans will never understand.DoomYoshi wrote:WHAT? Are you saying that since I was scum in last game, I can't be scum in this one? I like to think those events are independent... although perhaps I need to take more Stats classes;)
This has turned out a very difficult day 1. There are lots of connections i can see between players, but no major slip ups(not including AoG). Whoever flips due to the NK will be valuable info for the next lynch.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Yes I had, however he has claimed a character (a high-profile one at that) and no-one has counter-claimed, so I don't think there's much to pursue there. I wouldnt be surprised if it is partly fake though - vanilla townie in a 12-player game seems unlikely.blakebowling wrote:Did anyone else notice AoG hasn't posted at all since the attention shifted to myself and yoshi?

Ah. I must have missed that post when I was confirming. I'm actually uncertain of who we should be looking for at a lynch. I can, however assure you it's not me.DoomYoshi wrote:Actually he has. He was trying to figure out when being voted for became a scumtell lol
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 0#p3113323blakebowling wrote:Ah. I must have missed that post when I was confirming. I'm actually uncertain of who we should be looking for at a lynch. I can, however assure you it's not me.DoomYoshi wrote:Actually he has. He was trying to figure out when being voted for became a scumtell lol
I found it after you mentioned it, but I didn't see it the first time.DoomYoshi wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 0#p3113323blakebowling wrote:Ah. I must have missed that post when I was confirming. I'm actually uncertain of who we should be looking for at a lynch. I can, however assure you it's not me.DoomYoshi wrote:Actually he has. He was trying to figure out when being voted for became a scumtell lol
I mean this post. He was confused as to sg's rationale for voting for you.
Am I?DY wrote:Tails and Icon are normally inactive...
So you make a case on blake and then when called out on it, you switch to the inactive?DY wrote:Anyways, as promised: voting the inactive. It's a tough call, but only one player seems bent on not advancing the town' agenda. unvote vote jeraado Don't think you've escaped my notice either Icon and tails; we need some posts of substance. Today we have had 2 BWs and 3 cases presented as well as some subtle hints. It may not be an epic day 1, but we still got something done and I would like to hear your opinions on as much as possible.
Yes, I changed my mind since I realized the 'evidence' was not very strong. Also you will notice that I switched not when I was called on it, as both of my voters had begun to agree with me. I switched when there was still enough time to get a lynch together.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Am I?DY wrote:Tails and Icon are normally inactive...
Anyway I've read more into the exchange between you and MeDeFe--
So you make a case on blake and then when called out on it, you switch to the inactive?DY wrote:Anyways, as promised: voting the inactive. It's a tough call, but only one player seems bent on not advancing the town' agenda. unvote vote jeraado Don't think you've escaped my notice either Icon and tails; we need some posts of substance. Today we have had 2 BWs and 3 cases presented as well as some subtle hints. It may not be an epic day 1, but we still got something done and I would like to hear your opinions on as much as possible.
unvote vote DoomYoshi
-Tails

Shouldn't blake be at 3 instead of 4?safariguy5 wrote:Vote Count
DoomYoshi(2)- MeDeFe, tails
Tails(1)- Vio
No Lynch(1)- AoG
blake(4)- Rodion, naxus, shieldgenerator7
jeraado(1)- Yoshi
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Deadline in 1 Day and 5 hours.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Fixed.naxus wrote:Shouldn't blake be at 3 instead of 4?safariguy5 wrote:Vote Count
DoomYoshi(2)- MeDeFe, tails
Tails(1)- Vio
No Lynch(1)- AoG
blake(4)- Rodion, naxus, shieldgenerator7
jeraado(1)- Yoshi
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Deadline in 1 Day and 5 hours.


That's how I roll dude.blakebowling wrote:Vote DoomYoshi. I was hoping I wasn't the only one seeing something weird about him accusing everyone.

Why? Why lynch the claimed vanilla townie? If you genuinely think he's lying then make that claim, and be prepared to back it up. However given that you haven't voted for him and haven't given any reason for the lack of a counter-claim for a central figure, I'd have to assume that you're advocating lynching him because he doesn't have any powers? If that's the case then thats even scummier than voting no-lynch. The point of making sure that we at least make a real effort for a lynch is so we can learn information about each player, such as scummy statements, lies, voting patterns etc. What exactly would we learn by reforming a wagon here?DoomYoshi wrote:But seriously, if random lynch it is, why not go for the claimed vanilla townie?
