Moderator: Community Team

ALWAYS REACT!Phatscotty wrote: Excuses! excuses excuses. Cry me a river of excuses. Blow off your steam and cause lots of damage and destroy entire communities because hey, we can justify it! You are just building the hate and violence and crime hotter and hotter with your bullshit.
I will take back the name Barbarians, that was too nice. ANIMALS is more proper.
And greek, it makes sense!
Maybe if they wouldn't have been indoctrinated to believe that the state is supposed to provide everything for them, they wouldn't act of the mentality to go out and do crap like this. Or maybe if modern day youth were actually disciplined when they did wrong instead of everyone saying that they were just expressing themselves and could do whatever they wanted without consequences, they would think that riots like these are wrong.Iliad wrote:The youth aren't rioting to change the system, but their riots do reveal that they have been completely ignored by the system.
Night Strike wrote:Maybe if they wouldn't have been indoctrinated to believe that the state is supposed to provide everything for them, they wouldn't act of the mentality to go out and do crap like this. Or maybe if modern day youth were actually disciplined when they did wrong instead of everyone saying that they were just expressing themselves and could do whatever they wanted without consequences, they would think that riots like these are wrong.Iliad wrote:The youth aren't rioting to change the system, but their riots do reveal that they have been completely ignored by the system.
It's a real shame that individuals and families can't protect themselves and their property with lethal force in Britain. It's a lot easier to protect oneself with a gun than it is a solitary bat.
The state give the genuine rioters, genuine angry youth, genuine protesters anything?Night Strike wrote: Maybe if they wouldn't have been indoctrinated to believe that the state is supposed to provide everything for them, they wouldn't act of the mentality to go out and do crap like this. Or maybe if modern day youth were actually disciplined when they did wrong instead of everyone saying that they were just expressing themselves and could do whatever they wanted without consequences, they would think that riots like these are wrong.
radiojake wrote:
I would love to hear some first hand experiences from people actually participating in the riots and ask exactly 'why are you rioting?' - Otherwise I am a bit confused to exactly why this is happening -
This seems to fit exactly in with the disenfranchisement theme. Sure they're no Trotskys but they clearly feel as though they have gotten a raw deal and do not benefit from the system.radiojake wrote:radiojake wrote:
I would love to hear some first hand experiences from people actually participating in the riots and ask exactly 'why are you rioting?' - Otherwise I am a bit confused to exactly why this is happening -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6iLggKf ... r_embedded
Hmmm - This wasn't exactly the rationale I was hoping to hear -
If anything, this suggests that the education system has failed tremendously - I do not think these girls have one ounce of critical thought in them.

This is what you, liberals would love to assume, don't you?Iliad wrote: 1)I think I've already outlined it's the youth of the inner city, and this is the youth rioting, nearly all the reports agree.
I guess I was hoping for something slightly more eloquent and articulate -Baron Von PWN wrote:This seems to fit exactly in with the disenfranchisement theme. Sure they're no Trotskys but they clearly feel as though they have gotten a raw deal and do not benefit from the system.radiojake wrote:radiojake wrote:
I would love to hear some first hand experiences from people actually participating in the riots and ask exactly 'why are you rioting?' - Otherwise I am a bit confused to exactly why this is happening -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6iLggKf ... r_embedded
Hmmm - This wasn't exactly the rationale I was hoping to hear -
If anything, this suggests that the education system has failed tremendously - I do not think these girls have one ounce of critical thought in them.
My information is that he was a respected elder. This means he was a gangster but unlikely a drug dealer. He had a weapon but there was no firefight. It may be the case that he was shot because he tried to draw his weapon but this is a pure speculation at this point.jbrettlip wrote:Is it true that the guy that was shot at the beginnning of this was a known drug dealer, and was in a firefight with the police when he was shot?
It would be interesting to see how many morons end up writing about their exploits through their social media networks and get caught for it- Not much point in covering your face in the street if you go and brag about it on your facebook.Pope Joan wrote:My hope for this country is that MET don't stop on the rioters but go over the social networks and get all the organizers done on terrorist offences. Long Live the Queen
I'm obviously not rioting, but the one thing I do know is that breaking the law is fun. If you break the law within a group you feel like there's less chance to get caught.radiojake wrote:
I would love to hear some first hand experiences from people actually participating in the riots and ask exactly 'why are you rioting?' - Otherwise I am a bit confused to exactly why this is happening -
The violence on the streets is being dismissed as "pure criminality", as the work of a "violent minority", as "opportunism". This is madly insufficient. It is no way to talk about viral civil unrest. Angry young people with nothing to do and little to lose are turning on their own communities, and they cannot be stopped, and they know it. Tonight, in one of the greatest cities in the world, society is ripping itself apart.
Violence is rarely mindless. The politics of a burning building, a smashed-in shop or a young man shot by police may be obscured even to those who lit the rags or fired the gun, but the politics are there. Unquestionably there is far, far more to these riots than the death of Mark Duggan, whose shooting sparked off the unrest on Saturday when two police cars were set alight after a five-hour vigil at Tottenham police station.
Months of conjecture will follow these riots. Already, the internet is teeming with racist vitriol and wild speculation. The truth is that very few people know why this is happening. They don't know, because they were not watching these communities. Nobody has been watching Tottenham since the television cameras drifted away after the Broadwater Farm riots of 1985.
Most of the people who will be writing, speaking and pontificating about the disorder this weekend have absolutely no idea what it is like to grow up in a community where there are no jobs, no space to live or move, and the police are on the streets stopping-and-searching you as you come home from school. The people who do will be waking up this week in the sure and certain knowledge that after decades of being ignored and marginalised and harassed by the police, after months of not seeing any conceivable hope of a better future confiscated, they are finally on the news.
In one NBC report, a young man in Tottenham was asked if rioting really achieved anything:
"Yes," said the young man. "You wouldn't be talking to me now if we didn't riot, would you?
Two months ago we marched to Scotland Yard, more than 2,000 of us, all blacks, and it was peaceful and calm and you know what? Not a word in the press. Last night, a bit of rioting and looting and look around you.
Incorrect, the majority of sources agree that the rioters were from poorer areas of the community and were children in young teens to early 20s.Pope Joan wrote:This is what you, liberals would love to assume, don't you?Iliad wrote: 1)I think I've already outlined it's the youth of the inner city, and this is the youth rioting, nearly all the reports agree.
I have heard a BBC correspondent from the fast track trials yesterday. While this may not be representative, the fact is that among the rioters in London tried first
- the majority were black;
- the majority were in their 20-s;
- the majority had decent employment (among listed occupations were a university student, a soldier, a social worker, an IT consultant);
- half were from London and half came from outside (addresses from Essex and Kent were common).
A common defence was that the person was of a good character and the crime committed was just a moment of madness

Yes, they all agree on that.Iliad wrote:1)I think I've already outlined it's the youth of the inner city, and this is the youth rioting, nearly all the reports agree.
I could argue that many youths, if not all, have little to no investment in their community or neighborhood. Here in Philadelphia (US) we have had a number of flash mob type riots and violence over the past two years. Philadelphia has instituted a curfew in response. Is it because the youths have no investment in the community that they do this? Sure, one could argue that high school students or part-time workers or part-time college students have no significant investment in their community (apart from the place they work or live).Iliad wrote:2)You've mistaken my point. It is violence, it is theft. Nevertheless this rioting does reveal volumes about their situation. One can go the simplistic way and simply call them barbarians, or one can look at the underlying reasons of why hundreds/thousands (I'm completely guessing here, but from I do know 1,700 was far too few policemen but the 16,000 deployed has seemed to stop disorder in London) of young kids have absolutely no investment in their community, that they would destroy and ravage it, given the opportunity. One does not need to have a thought bubble above his head in order so others understand the motives. The anger at a police brutality has definitely shifted to one of greed and wanton violence and I'm not saying they're protesting for reforms. Their riots however, do reveal their disenfranchisement from their community and society. That is what I mean by disenfranchisement, not that they aren't in a democracy.
You need to explain this to me. How, specifically, has the system ignored them? On the flip side, what, specifically, has the system done to help them? Do these youths have access to education? Do these youths have access to healthcare? Do these youths have access to food and clothing? What sorts of things don't they have access to that the system could provide them (but that the system does not)?Iliad wrote:The youth aren't rioting to change the system, but their riots do reveal that they have been completely ignored by the system.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
A free LED tv.... preferably 40 inchthegreekdog wrote:You need to explain this to me. How, specifically, has the system ignored them? On the flip side, what, specifically, has the system done to help them? Do these youths have access to education? Do these youths have access to healthcare? Do these youths have access to food and clothing? What sorts of things don't they have access to that the system could provide them (but that the system does not)?Iliad wrote:The youth aren't rioting to change the system, but their riots do reveal that they have been completely ignored by the system.
No, it is what the reports are saying.Pope Joan wrote:This is what you, liberals would love to assume, don't you?Iliad wrote: 1)I think I've already outlined it's the youth of the inner city, and this is the youth rioting, nearly all the reports agree.
Highlight added for emphasis.Pope Joan wrote:I have heard a BBC correspondent from the fast track trials yesterday. While this may not be representative, the fact is that among the rioters in London tried first
- the majority were black;
- the majority were in their 20-s;
- the majority had decent employment (among listed occupations were a university student, a soldier, a social worker, an IT consultant);
- half were from London and half came from outside (addresses from Essex and Kent were common).
Not what I heard, from the BBC.. the source you quoted above.Pope Joan wrote:A common defence was that the person was of a good character and the crime committed was just a moment of madness
I think you hit the nail on the head here. And, this is pretty typical of ALL riots.Pedronicus wrote:I'm obviously not rioting, but the one thing I do know is that breaking the law is fun. If you break the law within a group you feel like there's less chance to get caught.radiojake wrote:
I would love to hear some first hand experiences from people actually participating in the riots and ask exactly 'why are you rioting?' - Otherwise I am a bit confused to exactly why this is happening -
These kids are viewing these riots as fun.
I'm not defending them. I'm just trying to put myself in their position and i can sort of understand how it's mushroomed.
The only way to stop these riots is to kill some of them with plastic bullets so that the parents (more likely parent singular) make sure they stay at home.