Moderator: Community Team
That was an episode on the Brady Bunch where Marsha gets her monthly and loses it was it not?DoomYoshi wrote:Here is my flavor spec:
There are no SKs. We are all town. We will gradually kill each other off, for suspicion of being Jack the Ripper. In the end, when the blood has been spilled and our minds are lost, we will all realize there is a bit of Jack the Ripper in each of us.
love this, but can we still lynch youDoomYoshi wrote:Here is my flavor spec:
There are no SKs. We are all town. We will gradually kill each other off, for suspicion of being Jack the Ripper. In the end, when the blood has been spilled and our minds are lost, we will all realize there is a bit of Jack the Ripper in each of us.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
2 or 3 SKs?nagerous wrote:I agree with this as well, I doubt there is just the single threat in this game, but probably either two or three lone individuals that the town is endangered from.HotShot53 wrote:Sounds to me like there is more than one threat, "some more wicked than others". So I'd expect Moriarty to be in the game and a threat, and maybe even a third threat like a copycat killer.Anarkistsdream wrote:
At 221B Baker Street, Sherlock Holmes and John Watson discuss their own intentions to catch one of the most dastardly villains to ever set foot in the country of England. However, they wondered if Holmes' archenemy, Dr. James Moriarty, had anything to do with these crimes.
And evil slid silently through the streets at night, some more wicked than others.
How many more murders will the Ripper carry out? Will he ever be caught? And what of the other murders going on in London? Copycat killers? Was it the Ripper?
Holmes and Watson are probably town, since they are going after the threats too per the scene.
(Are we already past the joke vote stage? I don't want to throw out a joke vote and then get killed for it lol)
IB wrote:3 sks would be stupdly imbalaced and highly doubtful.
At this point we can speculate all we want but in my mid there has to be a mafia factin. We have jak and we would have eithr a third party such as Moriarty or a copy cat.
We really wont know util tomorrow what we are up against besides Jack. I am sure the night scene provided will give beter insight.
Vote FloresdelMal
For no other reason then to get them to post.
get well soon, i have been sickly lately and it certainly sucks.strike wolf wrote:I am feeling a bit under the weather right now and have a moderate fever. I'll post when I can but I'm probably not going be very active the next day or so depending on if this is just a bug or not.
i agree wholeheartedly with this, to me is the only way the set up could make sense, and i do believe moriarty is most likely on the game. Also i want to point that there is no proof that "jack the reaper" is a man or a lonesome killer, is just a catchy name given by the press.strike wolf wrote:I would think alternate insanities and a possible miller is not out of the question to offset town's power. From the fact that there is a vigilante group, it is not much of a stretch to say that there is at least one scum in this game who is not fully bulletproof, though limited protection on one killer is also not out of the question.
LOL so a real post would be a vote?FloresDelMal wrote:get well soon, i have been sickly lately and it certainly sucks.strike wolf wrote:I am feeling a bit under the weather right now and have a moderate fever. I'll post when I can but I'm probably not going be very active the next day or so depending on if this is just a bug or not.
i agree wholeheartedly with this, to me is the only way the set up could make sense, and i do believe moriarty is most likely on the game. Also i want to point that there is no proof that "jack the reaper" is a man or a lonesome killer, is just a catchy name given by the press.strike wolf wrote:I would think alternate insanities and a possible miller is not out of the question to offset town's power. From the fact that there is a vigilante group, it is not much of a stretch to say that there is at least one scum in this game who is not fully bulletproof, though limited protection on one killer is also not out of the question.
Now as interesting as this whole set up discussion is, i don't think it will get us closer to have a much needed day 1 lynch, atm there are 2 persons who seem erratic and fishy to me:
1.- Mets BW on DY for quickly unvote after attracting a little of attention, and then justifying himself with a bunch of fluff about poor reading skills (scummiest behaviour of the day so far)
2.- benga with his pointless post's that make it seems like he is contributing when he is only giving a collection of random quotes with a shallow comment thrown in for spice things up, also i don't appreciate his accusation towards neb, saying he is throwing dust on our eyes, when he is obviously just trying to get things going.
is not too much but this is what i gather atm so i will unvote vote benga in an attempt to get a "real" post from him/her
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
^^^^^^new guy1 wrote:Read and caught up. Sorry, Ive been sick all weak, but I finally got really sick last night. Im better than I was last night, so Ill make a post.
I dont like how flores said that Mets BW on doom was the scummiest thing all day and then she voted binga supposedly because of his meaningless post and you "don't appreciate his accusation towards neb, saying he is throwing dust on our eyes, when he is obviously just trying to get things going." Because I have done exactly the same thing, Im just going to FOS Flores.
This being said, Benga OMGUSed, which I find to be something more scummy than what flores did (I may have the bias of experience in not properly exaggerating my feelings about multiple cases in one post). I will therefore, Unvote, vote benga.
No more SAD PANDA, anark? Is it bad that I read that phrase in his tone of voice.
I disagree with the interpretation that Met's vote was the scummiest thing all day, but given that he's already been called out for it by other people, I can see Flores' logic of voting someone who hasn't been presented as a candidate with scummy behavior.new guy1 wrote:Read and caught up. Sorry, Ive been sick all weak, but I finally got really sick last night. Im better than I was last night, so Ill make a post.
I dont like how flores said that Mets BW on doom was the scummiest thing all day and then she voted binga supposedly because of his meaningless post and you "don't appreciate his accusation towards neb, saying he is throwing dust on our eyes, when he is obviously just trying to get things going." Because I have done exactly the same thing, Im just going to FOS Flores.
This being said, Benga OMGUSed, which I find to be something more scummy than what flores did (I may have the bias of experience in not properly exaggerating my feelings about multiple cases in one post). I will therefore, Unvote, vote benga.
No more SAD PANDA, anark? Is it bad that I read that phrase in his tone of voice.
DoomYoshi wrote:^^^^^^new guy1 wrote:Read and caught up. Sorry, Ive been sick all weak, but I finally got really sick last night. Im better than I was last night, so Ill make a post.
I dont like how flores said that Mets BW on doom was the scummiest thing all day and then she voted binga supposedly because of his meaningless post and you "don't appreciate his accusation towards neb, saying he is throwing dust on our eyes, when he is obviously just trying to get things going." Because I have done exactly the same thing, Im just going to FOS Flores.
This being said, Benga OMGUSed, which I find to be something more scummy than what flores did (I may have the bias of experience in not properly exaggerating my feelings about multiple cases in one post). I will therefore, Unvote, vote benga.
No more SAD PANDA, anark? Is it bad that I read that phrase in his tone of voice.
What are you even talking about with the panda?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
No need to shit all over the theory. There are hints in scenes of Moriarty being a potential villain and also maybe Jack the Ripper as one. If nark had three killers all working alone I am sure he would balance it out with protective/investigative roles as well and restrictions to easily make it balanced in a 15 player game. A mafia group is a possibility of course but not every game is always cliched enough to use oneIron Butterfly wrote:3 sks would be stupidly imbalanced and highly doubtful.
At this point we can speculate all we want but in my mind there has to be a mafia faction. We have jack and we would have either a third party such as Moriarty or a copy cat.
We really wont know until tomorrow what we are up against besides Jack. I am sure the night scene provided will give better insight.
Vote FloresdelMal
For no other reason then to get them to post.
Siggednagerous wrote:No need to shit all over the theory. There are hints in scenes of Moriarty being a potential villain and also maybe Jack the Ripper as one. If nark had three killers all working alone I am sure he would balance it out with protective/investigative roles as well and restrictions to easily make it balanced in a 15 player game. A mafia group is a possibility of course but not every game is always cliched enough to use oneIron Butterfly wrote:3 sks would be stupidly imbalanced and highly doubtful.
At this point we can speculate all we want but in my mind there has to be a mafia faction. We have jack and we would have either a third party such as Moriarty or a copy cat.
We really wont know until tomorrow what we are up against besides Jack. I am sure the night scene provided will give better insight.
Vote FloresdelMal
For no other reason then to get them to post.
Iron Butterfly wrote:Well who am I to shit on someones theory? Its like being called a racist for disagreeing with Obama.
I was just pointing out what is most likely but folks can call it how they see fit without fear of negativity. This game is after all about theory and speculation.
This is about another game right??nagerous wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Well who am I to shit on someones theory? Its like being called a racist for disagreeing with Obama.
I was just pointing out what is most likely but folks can call it how they see fit without fear of negativity. This game is after all about theory and speculation.
You said that would make the game stupidly imbalanced, implying that what I had said was stupid, which is frankly offensive, especially your lack of respect. You can roll all you like, but your point is exactly my point, it is about theory and speculation so there is no need to be so hostile.
Hugs and love to ya. I will not indulge thank you very much. I sent ya a PM...take it there please. regardsIron Butterfly wrote:This is about another game right??nagerous wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Well who am I to shit on someones theory? Its like being called a racist for disagreeing with Obama.
I was just pointing out what is most likely but folks can call it how they see fit without fear of negativity. This game is after all about theory and speculation.
You said that would make the game stupidly imbalanced, implying that what I had said was stupid, which is frankly offensive, especially your lack of respect. You can roll all you like, but your point is exactly my point, it is about theory and speculation so there is no need to be so hostile.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
It's in the nature of OMGUS that there isn't really a "defense." If you just mean "here's a convenient excuse to force benga to say more things," just say so...safariguy5 wrote: I disagree with the interpretation that Met's vote was the scummiest thing all day, but given that he's already been called out for it by other people, I can see Flores' logic of voting someone who hasn't been presented as a candidate with scummy behavior.
OMGUS vote is obvious, but I wouldn't want an accidental lynch with the shortening lynch clock, so I will withhold a vote until benga posts a defense.
