Conquer Club

Unlike smallsoftralph, I am not full of venom, hatred, or vile words (well, except to point out once in a while that our COVID Troll vaxitoxin is FULL of SHIT).

I am not anti-Arabic. I do denounce the violence and hate that is clearly manifested by the behavior, actions, and words of Muslim extremists. It seems that poor ralph cannot make that distinction between extremist and the vast majority of good and peaceful Muslim.

I will admit that I have had many pleasant discussions with several attractive young Muslim ladies, tbh.

I will also point out that AGAIN that smallsoftralph is anti-American, anti-British, anti-French, anti-West, anti-semitic, and anti-Christian. He is a real hater while he worships the ground that his PAL vaxitoxin walks on. They are both pathetic humans who spew hate, body odor, and bad breath.

bigtoughralf wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:Sorry... but just to make sure I understand... you fine folks are saying that women (in the western world) dress a certain way to sexualize themselves for the gratification of men? I just want clarity here...

I was responding to a comment about women but in fairness, if you ask me then Western men can be equally as immodest.

I don't think Saxi's short shorts belong in this thread.

As for TGD's question, some do.

jimboston wrote:

The ram wrote:
Would you mind if I call you Heinrich from now on?

You’ve used that same lame joke before.

Got to move when you have no response to my jabs.

That small lame sentence was the perfect response to the paragraphs of utter dreary wank you wrote. And there was me thinking that you fancy yourself as some sort of psychological analyst. Now, read again and let me know what it says to you.

Oh btw, do you prefer if I call you heiny? It's a bit less formal

thegreekdog wrote:Sorry... but just to make sure I understand... you fine folks are saying that women (in the western world) dress a certain way to sexualize themselves for the gratification of men? I just want clarity here...

How on earth have you come to that conclusion? Women dress for their own gratification.

The ram wrote:
That small lame sentence was the perfect response to the paragraphs of utter dreary wank you wrote. And there was me thinking that you fancy yourself as some sort of psychological analyst. Now, read again and let me know what it says to you.

Paragraphs?

I think I wrote 5 or 6 sentences.

I’m sorry if that amount of reading is beyond your capabilities.

The ram wrote: Oh btw, do you prefer if I call you heiny? It's a bit less formal

Again, the same joke. Is Himmler the only monster from history that you know and can reference?

2dimes wrote:

bigtoughralf wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:Sorry... but just to make sure I understand... you fine folks are saying that women (in the western world) dress a certain way to sexualize themselves for the gratification of men? I just want clarity here...

I was responding to a comment about women but in fairness, if you ask me then Western men can be equally as immodest.

I don't think Saxi's short shorts belong in this thread.

They belong in any thread where people want elegance and a taste of the high life.

jp4 told me the high life tastes a little too salty for his liking.

bigtoughralf wrote:jp4 told me the high life tastes a little too salty for his liking.

That's funny. DDS' sister said the high life has more of a pineapple flavor.

Depends on the protection you're using

jimboston wrote:

The ram wrote:
That small lame sentence was the perfect response to the paragraphs of utter dreary wank you wrote. And there was me thinking that you fancy yourself as some sort of psychological analyst. Now, read again and let me know what it says to you.

Paragraphs?

I think I wrote 5 or 6 sentences.

I’m sorry if that amount of reading is beyond your capabilities.

The ram wrote: Oh btw, do you prefer if I call you heiny? It's a bit less formal

Again, the same joke. Is Himmler the only monster from history that you know and can reference?

Yeah paragraphs, 9 of the them. They've been quoted so the proof is there. Nine fucking paragraphs of anal wank, when it could have been condensed into 1 sentence- Jimbo is an incel.

Forget Heiny, perfect new name for you ‐----------- JIMCEL.

Perhaps you should come up with new material.

Which one of you is Jack and which one is Walter?

jimboston wrote:Perhaps you should come up with new material.

Jimcel this is a thread to help incels like yourself obtain a nice piece of putang. And we're staying on topic. You don't have to post, you can simply lurk in the background picking up handy tidbits of information.

Have you ever questioned this education you seem to value so highly? I mean what type of education endeavours to teach men that talking about women in a sexual way is bad and yet the sexual depravity that occurs during a gay march is worthy of the word 'pride '? Your education is simply mind control of the weak minded.

2dimes wrote:

bigtoughralf wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:Sorry... but just to make sure I understand... you fine folks are saying that women (in the western world) dress a certain way to sexualize themselves for the gratification of men? I just want clarity here...

I was responding to a comment about women but in fairness, if you ask me then Western men can be equally as immodest.

I don't think Saxi's short shorts belong in this thread.

As for TGD's question, some do.

This is probably the correct answer. I don't know for sure, but of the women I've surveyed, all of them are dressing the way they want to dress and not to impress one or more particular men. On the other hand (and stay with me here)... I work out on the Peloton occasionally (don't worry ram, I also lift weights and play rugby). The women who lead the Peloton bike courses dress a certain way and the camera work works a certain way for reasons inclusive of "hey, look at how attractive this woman is, don't you want to keep paying us to take her class and see how attractive she is?" I think sexuality works in a myriad of ways.

Anyway, I don't want to derail the "how to get putang" thread with my semi-serious discussion.

thegreekdog wrote:of the women I've surveyed

You must have used those special binoculars that detect a person's dreams and desires.

bigtoughralf wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:of the women I've surveyed

You must have used those special binoculars that detect a person's dreams and desires.

I like to think that when I ask someone a direct question, someone will answer me honestly. I suppose I could say "no, I don't believe you" but that seems tedious and, frankly, counterproductive to life generally.

thegreekdog wrote: I like to think that when I ask someone a direct question, someone will answer me honestly.

Direct question like...


"Whoa, that top is red hot! Did you put that on for me?"
Or more...
"Are you aware your G-string is visible? You should put on some different pants."

thegreekdog wrote:

bigtoughralf wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:of the women I've surveyed

You must have used those special binoculars that detect a person's dreams and desires.

I like to think that when I ask someone a direct question, someone will answer me honestly. I suppose I could say "no, I don't believe you" but that seems tedious and, frankly, counterproductive to life generally.

Hate to disappoint you, but given my generation and the generation after, you're going to get some really half ass answers for direct questions

Yes or no question? Well, congrats, now it's a gray area of morality and bullshit pseudo science that doesn't even pertain to your question to begin with.

Also, we've been trying to reach you about your cars extended warranty.

thegreekdog wrote:

bigtoughralf wrote:

thegreekdog wrote:of the women I've surveyed

You must have used those special binoculars that detect a person's dreams and desires.

I like to think that when I ask someone a direct question, someone will answer me honestly. I suppose I could say "no, I don't believe you" but that seems tedious and, frankly, counterproductive to life generally.

In my defense, when you asked a straight question I did give you a straight answer. I'm just not sure how you understand what motivates all these women you've been eyeing up to flaunt their cleavage, unless you've been doing a survey.

Personally I find these messy people with all their skin flapping around fairly unappealing but I guess I'm not their target audience.

The ram wrote:

jimboston wrote:Perhaps you should come up with new material.

Jimcel this is a thread to help incels like yourself obtain a nice piece of putang. And we're staying on topic. You don't have to post, you can simply lurk in the background picking up handy tidbits of information.

Have you ever questioned this education you seem to value so highly? I mean what type of education endeavours to teach men that talking about women in a sexual way is bad and yet the sexual depravity that occurs during a gay march is worthy of the word 'pride '? Your education is simply mind control of the weak minded.

I don’t think talking about women in a sexual way is bad all the time.
Some talk amongst men is healthy.

You do a few things that IMHO cross the line.

*You don’t just “talk about women in a sexual way”… you objectify them as nothing more than sexual objects.
There is a difference here. Evidence? The title of your thread. You are essentially equating women to nothing more than putnang.

*A little of this might be ok… but it seems to that that this is ALL you do.
-> BTW all the braggadocio makes me think you’re all bark and no bite.

*This talk isn’t just ‘amongst men’… it’s not private conversation with a buddy or in a locker room. It’s posted on here for all to see.

Moderation isn’t bad.

On a side note, jimcel is a pretty funny nickname.

bigtoughralf wrote:On a side note, jimcel is a pretty funny nickname.

If you’re in middle school…which I suspect is theram’s actual age.

jimboston wrote:

bigtoughralf wrote:On a side note, jimcel is a pretty funny nickname.

If you’re in middle school…which I suspect is theram’s actual age.

I’m telling you, Kallmann Syndrome…

Serbia wrote:

jimboston wrote:

bigtoughralf wrote:On a side note, jimcel is a pretty funny nickname.

If you’re in middle school…which I suspect is theram’s actual age.

I’m telling you, Kallmann Syndrome…

The good thing about incels is they have plenty of time on their hands to look up facts that are absolutely useless to a man that gets regular snatch. Keeps them from thinking about killing women though, so sometimes best to be polite and pretend to be interested.

Oh really Serbia, how interesting. Please do tell more....

The ram wrote:

Serbia wrote:

jimboston wrote:

bigtoughralf wrote:On a side note, jimcel is a pretty funny nickname.

If you’re in middle school…which I suspect is theram’s actual age.

I’m telling you, Kallmann Syndrome…

The good thing about incels is they have plenty of time on their hands to look up facts that are absolutely useless to a man that gets regular snatch. Keeps them from thinking about killing women though, so sometimes best to be polite and pretend to be interested.

Oh really Serbia, how interesting. Please do tell more....

Go see a doctor. She can explain it to you better than I can.

Ugh. Serb. Gotta quit quoting those tools' posts. So much more pleasant when they're hidden

And since I was unfortunate enough to see it.....I laughed at the faceless bot that insinuated he was a "man that got regular snatch".

What an eloquent statement. It speaks volumes about his moral compass

Of course, since it's probably a 13 year old paraplegic with tourettes, like saxi and the rest of these wastes of skin, I guess the point is moot.

Anyhow, I kindly request you refrain from quoting.