Conquer Club

test post.

[b]test[/b] I'll have to decide if firth is jester or not, I have some signs that tell me if he is when/if it happens, but none are triggered right now, I just find voting for the sake of not being suspicious, suspicious. Who knows? In some way, he/she might be miller and not want to get investigated.

I'm he. And feel free to investigate me.

I find it very hard to defend myself, considering there is very little to defend against.

diddle wrote:I find it very hard to defend myself, considering there is very little to defend against.

That's a full blown confession.

firth4eva wrote:

diddle wrote:I find it very hard to defend myself, considering there is very little to defend against.

That's a full blown confession.

I think it sounds like he's saying that there is no evidence brought against him, so there's nothing there that he can argue against. This whole bandwagon seems very suspicious to me. What exactly did diddle do that seems scummy? He's being more active than in previous games, apparently... why exactly is that scummy? I'm going to look long and hard at the people who jumped at this chance for a very low-proof lynch... I'm not saying I'm sure diddle's innocent, because some of his posts do seem a little fishy, but we can't afford to take chances and accidentally lynch a townie on day 1. Let's have some more concrete incrimination before we do something rash.

we dont seem to be getting anywhere i suggest we either push diddle to claim or pick on someone who isnt very active, militant springs to mind but there are probably others i cant remember.

mr. incrediball wrote:

pmchugh wrote:

mr. incrediball wrote:just when i thought we have a good day 1 going, someone pulls out the wagons...

fos on the diddle-wagon.

random bandwagoning is NOT cool, people!

ok firstly how else are we ment to get the game going and secondly there was a reason behind my vote, in the last game i played with diddle he never voted anyone in the entire game (lovo's random mafia remember) so i find it strange that he has here. Oh and i was the first one who voted so i wasnt bandwagonning anyway. Not that you were accusing me just asking whats wrong with it?

i'm just saying, a random bandwagon on day 1 is pure gold for scum looking for a quick lynch.

i wasn't accusing you, since your vote was random, but skoff (illy? curse the esoog and their uniform avatars!) and cena know better. usually, the bandwagons that get rolling without any real evidence are aimed at townies, and the scum are the first to hop on.

so, i'd go in to vote illy (possibly skoff, whichever one it was) or cena to make my point, but

firth wrote:vote diddle so as not to look suscicious

this is ultra-scummy. unvote vote firth.

Okay what happened was pmc joked, I picked up on the joke and continued it.

Notice how both me and pmc joked. I voted because it's 9 to lynch and I was putting the second vote on him.

Then a heap of people jumped on the wagon SERIOUSLY.

You wanna find scum look at the people who jumped on it: cena, nag firth

militant does look like a good target for day 1 lynch as he hasn't helped out that much.

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:militant does look like a good target for day 1 lynch as he hasn't helped out that much.

I would be okay with this.

Iliad wrote:
Okay what happened was pmc joked, I picked up on the joke and continued it.

Notice how both me and pmc joked. I voted because it's 9 to lynch and I was putting the second vote on him.

Then a heap of people jumped on the wagon SERIOUSLY.

You wanna find scum look at the people who jumped on it: cena, nag firth

well my 40phds have mentioned that diddle voted them when ive been talking about them. He hasnt unvited as of yet

dustn hasn't helped much either but is all for lynching militant. unvote vote dustn







Yeah, I'm being serious this time

Sorry for not being as active as i usually am, Some real life stuff cropped up which meant i couldnt get on as much. Anyway, I read through the thread, I am a little suspicious of LSU for this post:

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:militant does look like a good target for day 1 lynch as he hasn't helped out that much.

I concede I have not helped out much and have not been very active, but surely it would be better to get an inactive replaced than lynch them.

Right then, unvote just to make cena happy. Although as I said in my post I hadn't reread (don't worry, I have now) so wasn't to know anything about any phd's.

What Dito said was correct, I have no evidence posted against me, which makes it increasingly difficult to argue my case. The only point I can dismiss is the one that pmc made when he voted me. He said that he was amazed that I had voted, as in the last mafia he played in with me, I rarely voted. The last mafia he played with me, was Lovo's random mafia, and anyone else who played in that will remember that I had a post restriction. A very annoying post restriction, so annoying in fact that it deterred me from posting as much as I would have liked. I had to make all my posts in Spanish. Obviously I just used an online translator, but it still made it very difficult for the other players to understand me, as we all know how useless online translators really are. So as I was saying, I didn't post often. And when I did post, it generally wasn't a suitable time to vote. So rather than changing my vote every time I posted, I held my vote back. So basically, this whole bandwagon is formed over some meta gaming, and meta gaming using a one off game for me.

So I'd appreciate it if you all unvoted and voted for the real scum. Firth. You've been saying that my posts were a 'little fishy', then just look at his.

firth4eva wrote: vote diddle so that i don't look susiscious

See, only a scum player wouldn't be able to bold his vote...... This vote was my fourth, and really, the beginning of the wagin, along with cena.

firth4eva wrote:You're all stupid

OMG SCUM.

firth4eva wrote:

diddle wrote:I find it very hard to defend myself, considering there is very little to defend against.

That's a full blown confession.

Is it?

By far the first post I quoted is scummiest, so now its up to you guys to decide.
Vote Firth

jesssssssssssssssssssssssssssster he is. .

Erm Nag. Star wars mafia is taht way . Anywho, I can assure diddle is not getting a peace of me tonight.

I think that we should lynch someone else and tonight the vig (assuming there is one) takes down firth.

dustn64 wrote:I think that we should lynch someone else and tonight the vig (assuming there is one) takes down firth.

Definately not. You want the peace right?

dustn64 wrote:I think that we should lynch someone else and tonight the vig (assuming there is one) takes down firth.

that sounds good to me, im pretty sure he is jester or scum, i just hope there is a vig in this game.

All we really have to go on is the people that jumped on diddle's wagon unvote vote nag

also FOS cenai think the post restriction may be to cover up for actually being scum, anyone know what a doctor with 40 phds would be able to do?

firth4eva wrote:

dustn64 wrote:I think that we should lynch someone else and tonight the vig (assuming there is one) takes down firth.

Definately not. You want the peace right?

for christ's sake get piece right!


however, firth seems very jestery to me, so i'm going to unvote.

of course, he could be bluffing.

ditto- your right, this bandwagon does sound scummy, Who started it, maybe we should vote that person

pmchugh wrote:

dustn64 wrote:I think that we should lynch someone else and tonight the vig (assuming there is one) takes down firth.

that sounds good to me, im pretty sure he is jester or scum, i just hope there is a vig in this game.

All we really have to go on is the people that jumped on diddle's wagon unvote vote nag

also FOS cenai think the post restriction may be to cover up for actually being scum, anyone know what a doctor with 40 phds would be able to do?

So you pick me out of a whole bunch of people on a bandwagon, which you yourself appear to have been a part of... Have you even read my post related to the wagon? No you haven't because otherwise you would not be voting me... Have a read back before you make accusations like that again.

Fircoal wrote:Vote Count

Militant (1) Cena,
animorpherv (2) Militant, LSU,
LSU (2) Skoff, LV,
Frenchie-chan (1) MM,
MM (1) Frenchie-chan,
LV (1) MIB,
Cena (1) Diddle,
Diddle (5) Pmchugh Illy, Cena, Nag, Firth
Pmchugh (1) Dustn,
Firth (1) animorpherv,



16 Alive, 9 to lynch, 5 to get a kick in the balls (1 for LV)

Diddle and LV get kicked in the balls

Look at the people on the wagon, first me so you can hardly saying i was banwaggoning considering i was the only one on it and it was pretty much a joke.

Then Illiad who has also said he was joking.

Cena who it appears may be a doctor of some sorts.

and firth who is either jester or scum, we cant kill incase he is a jester.

That leaves you.

nagerous wrote: If however, you do have a lot of experience and have played 30 or so games with diddle in the past, which I have you should know his playing style... which is actually generally being very quiet and never posting his own theories and what not... exactly the kind of guy that would be good for a day one lynch and he is unlikely to help the town too much.

unvote vote diddle.

Here is your reason for voting him, ok he may not help the town a lot during the day but what if he is a cop or doc or something like that? Should we just get rid of him because he isnt a frequent poster?

Well obviously I am not advocating that we lynch him before he claims.... Can't you say that anyone could potentially be a doc or cop, you will only find that out with a bandwagon and thats what day one is always going to be like, essentially a random bandwagon. It is better hence to get rid of someone who is not going to post at all. I've even seen diddle as a cop before (stargate) and he was crap, he didn't give the town one investigation result and eventually scum won easily. Whats your great suggestion?? Lynch me? because I thought it might be a good idea to get rid of some deadweight when there are no other current leads..... That's weak.

nagerous wrote:Well obviously I am not advocating that we lynch him before he claims.... Can't you say that anyone could potentially be a doc or cop, you will only find that out with a bandwagon and thats what day one is always going to be like, essentially a random bandwagon. It is better hence to get rid of someone who is not going to post at all. I've even seen diddle as a cop before (stargate) and he was crap, he didn't give the town one investigation result and eventually scum won easily. Whats your great suggestion?? Lynch me? because I thought it might be a good idea to get rid of some deadweight when there are no other current leads..... That's weak.

I think its a stupid bandwagon he has said absolutely nothing scummy so far, so i see no reason to lynch him. Beacause he hasnt played well in the past does not meen that he wont play well in this game. And if this was the case, then even in the unlikely case that he is scum then would he be much of a threat?