Moderator: Cartographers
NICE.cairnswk wrote:Those are simply the geogrphic plates from google with two transparencies over the top.yeti_c wrote:Love the mountains/hills bottom left - but they're not as good on the right...
C.
Please refresh your browser, i have fix those mountains.

Version 13.oaktown wrote:I think the feet are kinda fun - in keeping with other fun elements on the map. They may be a bit dark, and they could be confused as a one-way attack.
I'm not sure if you've reworked the bonuses lately, but regardless I'll make another argument for East Trinity being a +3, ...
edit: I just saw the CBD... kinda gets lost.



Fixed, please refresh your browseryeti_c wrote:The "Walking Tracks" has washed out in comparison to the other text in there - can you fix that?
C.

Done.cairnswk wrote:Fixed, please refresh your browseryeti_c wrote:The "Walking Tracks" has washed out in comparison to the other text in there - can you fix that?
C.



Juan,,,i don't mean to be glib but does it really matterJuan_Bottom wrote:I can't fully see it, cause it's taking forever to load, but the water ripples are still messed up and driving me crazy. The perspective is waaayy off.

For some reason it drives me nuts. I don't know if it bothers anyone else.cairnswk wrote:Juan,,,i don't mean to be glib but does it really matterJuan_Bottom wrote:I can't fully see it, cause it's taking forever to load, but the water ripples are still messed up and driving me crazy. The perspective is waaayy off.
Yes to match sydney metro!gho wrote:I love how your doing a small aussie town. The tinnie routes to bungalow are slightly confusing, at first look i thought that east trinity connected to edmonton east.
The trees around Mt Whitfield also look a bit confusing, why are they only around the edge? Also why is it called Cairns metro, why not just cairns? or is it to match sydney metro?


I didn't notice this until Juan pointed it out, and now I can't stop looking at it. And no, it doesn't matter... at least not for my stamp.Juan_Bottom wrote:I can't fully see it, cause it's taking forever to load, but the water ripples are still messed up and driving me crazy. The perspective is waaayy off.
The perspective will most likely be way off since the map is flat with the mini-map signage, but the title is 3D concept.oaktown wrote:I didn't notice this until Juan pointed it out, and now I can't stop looking at it. And no, it doesn't matter... at least not for my stamp.Juan_Bottom wrote:I can't fully see it, cause it's taking forever to load, but the water ripples are still messed up and driving me crazy. The perspective is waaayy off.
Border fixed, and neutral removed to Redlynch Valley.That and the extra-heavy border that, oddly, goes completely around Cairnswk.
I'm sure this was discussed earlier, but what's the logic behind making Cairnsk a starting neutral? Perhaps Redlynch Valley would be a better choice?
Thanks for apology but not needed.And my apologies for screwing up my evaluation of the bonuses earlier - I'd said that Redlynch and East Trinity were the same size, but they aren't. I guess I was reading all of the lines on it incorrectly - now that the region is cleaner it is obviously only 3 territories. But I still like East Trinity better as a +3, since it is so linear.
LIne indicators placed on mini-map, does that assist?One little colorblind thing... two regions that are close for me are East Trinity and Gordonvale. The small map erases any other colorblind issues on this map, but since East Trinity is broken up somebody could think that part of Eat Trinity actually goes with Gordonvale. You could change a color up, or you could somehow better indicate which territories go with the 3 on the small map.
Sig addedNot that anybody will confuse this for anybody else's work, but no butterfly sig?




Thanks oaktownoaktown wrote:I don't see anything else and nothing seems to be coming up, so I was stalling for time and waiting for the butterfly. Now that you've added it...
and C.yeti_c wrote:Nice work Cairns!!
C.


i think it looks fine given there is a certain "modern naivety" to the style of the mapZeakCytho wrote:Could you fix up the grass in the bottom left? I still think it looks off. I think the problem is the sharp contrast between the light and dark grass portions.

Thanks Hulmey, pleased you like.hulmey wrote:fantastic Map..i really like the attention to detail you have given it



