PopeBenXVI wrote:Well Snorril......Obama did approve sex ed for kindergardeners, so look it up. Here are some excerps of approved material from SB99 which he voted to approve. Like it or not here is the truth. Teaching kids about places a stranger should not touch you and this garbage are way different.
- A person’s genitals, reproductive organs, and genes determine whether the person is male or female.
- A boy/man has nipples, a penis, a scrotum, and testicles.
- A girl/woman has breasts, nipples, a vulva, a clitoris, a vagina, a uterus, and ovaries.
- Both boys and girls have body parts that feel good when touched.
- Vaginal intercourse – when a penis is placed inside a vagina – is the most common way for a sperm and egg to join.
- Masterbation should be done is a private place
- Some people of the same sex can be attracted to each other and fall in love.
WHAT THE %&#@ do 4-5 year olds need this crap for? Who is the radical.... Sarah who says parents should educate their kids on sex when that child is old enough or Obama who wants to reach 5 year olds about masterbating & intercourse?
Obama is often quoted as saying that when it comes to sex education in public schools, “it’s the right thing to do ... to provide age-appropriate sex education, science-based sex education in schools,” placing an emphasis on the word "appropriate." But Obama has also said he does not support, "explicit sex education to children in kindergarten."
In a debate with Republican Alan Keyes, against whom Obama was running for an open seat in the U.S. Senate in 2004, Obama made it clear that at least one reason he supported the bill was that it would help teach young kids to recognize inappropriate behavior and pedophiles:
Keyes, Oct. 21, 2004: Well, I had noticed that, in your voting, you had voted, at one point, that sex education should begin in kindergarten, and you justified it by saying that it would be "age-appropriate" sex education. [It] made me wonder just exactly what you think is "age-appropriate."
Obama: We have a existing law that mandates sex education in the schools. We want to make sure that it's medically accurate and age-appropriate. Now, I'll give you an example, because I have a six-year-old daughter and a three-year-old daughter, and one of the things my wife and I talked to our daughter about is the possibility of somebody touching them inappropriately, and what that might mean. And that was included specifically in the law, so that kindergarteners are able to exercise some possible protection against abuse, because I have family members as well as friends who suffered abuse at that age. So, that's the kind of stuff that I was talking about in that piece of legislation.
SB99: Course material and instruction shall discuss and provide
for the development of positive communication skills to maintain healthy relationships and avoid unwanted sexual activity. ... Course material and instruction shall teach pupils ... how to say no to unwanted sexual advances ... and shall include information about verbal, physical, and visual sexual harassment, including without limitation nonconsensual sexual advances, nonconsensual physical sexual contact, and rape by an acquaintance. The course material and instruction shall contain methods of preventing sexual assault by an acquaintance, including exercising good judgment and avoiding behavior that impairs one's judgment.
Seems that teaching kids about places a stranger can not touch you is all that kindergarteners
are taught. The stuff you list is likely from the part of the bill addressing later sex ed. As someone who went through Illinois schools (both public and private) from age three to eighteen, I can assure you that they didn't even mention the stuff you listed until I was an 8th grader...and let's be honest, by that point all but the most sheltered know all about that kind of crap.
