Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
We clearly DID NOT reach the deadline due to inactivity, there were 40 pages of content in D1. There's no way that satisfies this stated criterion for a plurality lynch.If a deadline is reached due to inactivity, the player with the most vote will be considered lynched.If a deadline is reached due to an impasse, I will consider it a no lynch and the game will go into night phase without a death.

StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
Metsfanmax wrote:I do not understand this. The quoted thing from Epitaph says
We clearly DID NOT reach the deadline due to inactivity, there were 40 pages of content in D1. There's no way that satisfies this stated criterion for a plurality lynch.If a deadline is reached due to inactivity, the player with the most vote will be considered lynched.If a deadline is reached due to an impasse, I will consider it a no lynch and the game will go into night phase without a death.
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
Epitaph1 wrote:Deadline for actions is Monday 1pm Easter Time (roughly 72 hours).





StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Storr obviously was just trying to save his own skin - I'd still be happy to vote for him at the end of the day if there are no other strong candidates, but first I'd like to know why the others jumped on that bandwagon instead of just going after him?sempaispellcheck wrote:Tempted to vote Storr for creating the bandwagon that cost us a vig.
Anyone have any better ideas?
sempai
Save my own skin yes.degaston wrote:Storr obviously was just trying to save his own skin - I'd still be happy to vote for him at the end of the day if there are no other strong candidates, but first I'd like to know why the others jumped on that bandwagon instead of just going after him?sempaispellcheck wrote:Tempted to vote Storr for creating the bandwagon that cost us a vig.
Anyone have any better ideas?
sempai

I think it is all on knowing the flavor of the story. Mad eye is a very powerful member, where it was tough to call what Snape's role would be in this. If I would have been on and saw the claim then, I would have been off the deg case.degaston wrote:Storr obviously was just trying to save his own skin - I'd still be happy to vote for him at the end of the day if there are no other strong candidates, but first I'd like to know why the others jumped on that bandwagon instead of just going after him?sempaispellcheck wrote:Tempted to vote Storr for creating the bandwagon that cost us a vig.
Anyone have any better ideas?
sempai

Did you not get my present?StorrZerg wrote:Save my own skin yes.degaston wrote:Storr obviously was just trying to save his own skin - I'd still be happy to vote for him at the end of the day if there are no other strong candidates, but first I'd like to know why the others jumped on that bandwagon instead of just going after him?sempaispellcheck wrote:Tempted to vote Storr for creating the bandwagon that cost us a vig.
Anyone have any better ideas?
sempai
But losing a vig vs an investigation role.
The lynch very well could have been stalled and been on investigation.
Should point out who died...
I think we found our lynch for today.*Pixar* wrote:actually what do you guys think of mtam claiming Hairy Potter but the scum not targetting him? kind of fishy...
I wasn't really convinced by the case against you, to be honest, and pershy wasn't exactly clear about what his role was when he claimed.degaston wrote:Storr obviously was just trying to save his own skin - I'd still be happy to vote for him at the end of the day if there are no other strong candidates, but first I'd like to know why the others jumped on that bandwagon instead of just going after him?sempaispellcheck wrote:Tempted to vote Storr for creating the bandwagon that cost us a vig.
Anyone have any better ideas?
sempai
Pixar's on the top of my scum list right now, but I'd still appreciate an explanation for whether you could, or could not be killed in the night.mtamburini wrote:I think we found our lynch for today.*Pixar* wrote:actually what do you guys think of mtam claiming Hairy Potter but the scum not targetting him? kind of fishy...
Regardless if I can or cannot be targeted, this is not a pro town question to be asking.degaston wrote:Pixar's on the top of my scum list right now, but I'd still appreciate an explanation for whether you could, or could not be killed in the night.mtamburini wrote:I think we found our lynch for today.*Pixar* wrote:actually what do you guys think of mtam claiming Hairy Potter but the scum not targetting him? kind of fishy...
I don't think refusing to provide answers to questions that are asked of you is a pro-town thing to do - it makes you look suspicious, which leads to more questions, which can lead to a lynch, which would then be a wasted day (at best) if you're town.mtamburini wrote:Regardless if I can or cannot be targeted, this is not a pro town question to be asking.degaston wrote:Pixar's on the top of my scum list right now, but I'd still appreciate an explanation for whether you could, or could not be killed in the night.mtamburini wrote:I think we found our lynch for today.*Pixar* wrote:actually what do you guys think of mtam claiming Hairy Potter but the scum not targetting him? kind of fishy...