Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I still stand by this.wiggybowler wrote:You knew he was a townie and were just trying to push a lynch on an innocent. Throwing the blame at us was just to keep the attention off of you.panicker wrote:FOS:GLEE,SELIN,WIGGYBOWLER
For not wanting to drop the hammer when we have so little to go on and are so close to losing.
Is it cos you don't want one of your mafia buddies dead and are stalling for a no-lynch?
Vote--panicker
ill changed if you have a good reason why you jumped at us when, someone said to wait and let him defend himself.
Actually, if we lynch someone today, we lose.panicker wrote:well my theory left is giving a total outside chance of a town victory ...
4 left and the game still rolls on so there's almost definately mafia left (i say this because there's an outside chance we have three town left and an independant) and if theres 1 mafia , theres more than likely gonna be 2 (one of each as i don't see spin having a mafia of 2 and a mafia of 3 , he seems like a neat uniform kinda guy) if this is the case then the only way we can win is to lynch 1 mafia and hope the other misses his night choice ( told you it was slim lol )
so theres me , pcm and wiggy posted today ?
I'm hoping one of you are town and if you are we need to vote the other guy.
So i'm calling out to the other town , I'm town and I've got one power left , hopefully you will have too and you know what i'm saying .
Other than that i think its curtains for us
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
your no lynch argument only helps mafia!pancakemix wrote:I think my No Lynch argument should be convincing enough, but that's just me.
No, it narrows down the number of possibilities. Theory time.Selin wrote:your no lynch argument only helps mafia!pancakemix wrote:I think my No Lynch argument should be convincing enough, but that's just me.
if we don't lynch one today, mafia will kill another one and we won't be in a better situation tomorrow, but 1 townie less.
although i'm still not sure about panicker, your no lynch vote is a stronger clue for me at this stage.
vote: pancakemix
.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
if there are two mafia left that will mean 2 kills tonight. how do you think to win, if you are not mafia?pancakemix wrote:No, it narrows down the number of possibilities. Theory time.Selin wrote:your no lynch argument only helps mafia!pancakemix wrote:I think my No Lynch argument should be convincing enough, but that's just me.
if we don't lynch one today, mafia will kill another one and we won't be in a better situation tomorrow, but 1 townie less.
although i'm still not sure about panicker, your no lynch vote is a stronger clue for me at this stage.
vote: pancakemix
.
Two members from each scum group are dead. If each scum group had 3 members to start, then there is 1 left each. Fellow townie, I urge you not to vote/vote no lynch. It's the only way we have a chance.
There's a chance they'll kill each other.Selin wrote:if there are two mafia left that will mean 2 kills tonight. how do you think to win, if you are not mafia?pancakemix wrote:No, it narrows down the number of possibilities. Theory time.Selin wrote:your no lynch argument only helps mafia!pancakemix wrote:I think my No Lynch argument should be convincing enough, but that's just me.
if we don't lynch one today, mafia will kill another one and we won't be in a better situation tomorrow, but 1 townie less.
although i'm still not sure about panicker, your no lynch vote is a stronger clue for me at this stage.
vote: pancakemix
.
Two members from each scum group are dead. If each scum group had 3 members to start, then there is 1 left each. Fellow townie, I urge you not to vote/vote no lynch. It's the only way we have a chance.
.
.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.