Moderator: Cartographers
I'm with gimil on this one. Especially the mountains/glaciers. To be honest they look more like you took your greatwall from Transsib, colored it white and placed it this map. IMO, the mountains are the only thing wrong with this revamp. We all know you can do better mountains, so let's see some different varieties on here.gimil wrote:At the risk of sounding like the bad guy, I am still not feeling the impassable stuff. Unfortunately I am not being much help in a solution. Does anyone else feel like this?
I don't recycle my (or anyone else's) graphics. Everything here is drawn from scratch, by me, for this project only.isaiah40 wrote:To be honest they look more like you took your greatwall from Transsib, colored it white and placed it this map.
IMO, they're fine and fit the style of the map.isaiah40 wrote:IMO, the mountains are the only thing wrong with this revamp.

They really don't fit though. The impassables themselves are good artistically but they do not fit on this map in their current state. Every other detail on this map blends together beautifully and as far as graphics stamping it, I would argue is ready. Just the impassables stick out in a negative manner, they sort of sit on top of the map rather than feeling integrated like everything else.natty_dread wrote:
IMO, they're fine and fit the style of the map.
Can I get some kind of reasoning here? People keep telling me they hate this and that, but it would help if I could get some actually constructive feedback here. What exactly is wrong with the mountains, or what kind of mountains would you rather see on the map and why?
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong

natty_dread wrote:Why do you think they do not fit the map? What about them makes you think they don't fit the map? What kind of impassables would you rather see on the map?
See, personally I think they fit the map just fine. So I'm afraid unless I get some specifics there's nothing I can do about it. If I try to "fix" them without seeing what is wrong with them, I'll just end up with another set of impassables that you think don't fit the map. So I'm going to need some details, some specific answers, instead of just vague "they don't fit" or "they look ugly" comments.
That is exactly what is wrong with them, as well as what DiM has said about them being to uniform. I have said this a couple of times now.they sort of sit on top of the map rather than feeling integrated like everything else.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
UGH... head explodes.gimil wrote:That is exactly what is wrong with them, as well as what DiM has said about them being to uniform. I have said this a couple of times now.

Because people keep asking me to change the impassables.DiM wrote:why did you change the forests?


Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
I don't know... I tried it, and if I bring the contrast too low, they lose all of their depth... nullifying all the things DiM and you wanted me to do for the mountains.gimil wrote:I think if you brought down the tone of the mountains so it is the same shade of white/grey as Iceland the new mountains will look fab.

Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
You mean like this?TaCktiX wrote:Agreed on the look, it's a major improvement over the original, my only niggle about the mountains. I realize that your current technique has its limits, but if it's possible to make them a smidge darker to match the darker theme of the entire map? I realize this sounds counter-intuitive with the icy colors on the map, but I think the contrast will be good.

