Moderator: Community Team
huamulan wrote:you ought to understand that most Europeans don't give a shit about what happens in the US of A
huamulan wrote: You don't have to live in a country to hold a valid opinion on that country's internal affairs. Particularly when those affairs are as generic as 'gay marriage' or 'the role of government'.

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
BBS wins.BigBallinStalin wrote:About fussball flipfloppers:
It's profitable enough for certain actors to stage a believable performance, so why not?
"ur not [nationality P], shuddap!"
Never understood that. It's tastes and preferences. You're from A, and you find country B interesting enough to comment about. Fine with me! Case closed.
I don't understand what is gained. What's the profit? Simply falling seems to draw the appropriate response from the referee. Writhing in pain on the pitch doesn't gain the player much (although maybe someone can enlighten me).BigBallinStalin wrote:About fussball flipfloppers:
It's profitable enough for certain actors to stage a believable performance, so why not?
It looks like something more serious has happened than has actually happened. Referees are more sympathetic, fans are more supportive, etc.thegreekdog wrote:I don't understand what is gained. What's the profit? Simply falling seems to draw the appropriate response from the referee. Writhing in pain on the pitch doesn't gain the player much (although maybe someone can enlighten me).BigBallinStalin wrote:About fussball flipfloppers:
It's profitable enough for certain actors to stage a believable performance, so why not?
So, basically, the same system as the CC reporting posts function.jonesthecurl wrote:I believe it's meant to bring the ref's attention to what could be a foul. If you man up and carry on, it will be ignored.
But I'm not a sport fan, so I may be wrong.
Not ignored, but there's usually no harm in a bit of ham acting, plus, it's worth pointing out that a lot of players who do ham it up are foreign. e.g., English ain't their first language, or possibly even one in which they can say "That bloke trod on my foot, then dug his spikes into my thigh when I was down" to the ref.jonesthecurl wrote:I believe it's meant to bring the ref's attention to what could be a foul. If you man up and carry on, it will be ignored.
But I'm not a sport fan, so I may be wrong.
Pretty much- any non contact sport needs to keep a tight eye on this. Contact sports suffer the opposite problem, a mentality of playing on with an injury. A good ref shouldn't be impartial with regards to teams alone, but also to players within teams. I guess I've argued this with you about Ice Hockey a bit in the past, but the sport you didn't mention that's having big issues with this at the mo is American football.Army of GOD wrote:yea, if they're writing in supposed pain on the ground, the contact looks more malicious and you're more likely to get the call.
Or it could be like in baseball, where you argue not to change the umpires mind about the call that just happened, but you're arguing for a call to go your way in the future.
I'm not sure how much basketball you watch tgd, but I love Jeff Van Gundy who commentates for ESPN/ABC and is doing all the games for the finals. He thinks blatant floppers should either get a technical foul during the game or a hefty fine afterwards and I agree completely. It's not so bad in hockey, but football should adopt this policy too.
I agree, but I understand where the not wanting to make public an injury comes from.Symmetry wrote:Pretty much- any non contact sport needs to keep a tight eye on this. Contact sports suffer the opposite problem, a mentality of playing on with an injury. A good ref shouldn't be impartial with regards to teams alone, but also to players within teams. I guess I've argued this with you about Ice Hockey a bit in the past, but the sport you didn't mention that's having big issues with this at the mo is American football.Army of GOD wrote:yea, if they're writing in supposed pain on the ground, the contact looks more malicious and you're more likely to get the call.
Or it could be like in baseball, where you argue not to change the umpires mind about the call that just happened, but you're arguing for a call to go your way in the future.
I'm not sure how much basketball you watch tgd, but I love Jeff Van Gundy who commentates for ESPN/ABC and is doing all the games for the finals. He thinks blatant floppers should either get a technical foul during the game or a hefty fine afterwards and I agree completely. It's not so bad in hockey, but football should adopt this policy too.
To my mind, faking an injury is pretty serious, but faking not having an injury when you have one is dangerous.
Aye- didn't want to make a hugely long post, but ignoring injury is a problem in contact and non-contact sports. I guess my point was that it tends to be more of an issue in contact sports (ex-rugby player here). I don't feel that playing up an injury a bit for the ref is anywhere near as serious as playing down an injury for the coach.Army of GOD wrote:I agree, but I understand where the not wanting to make public an injury comes from.Symmetry wrote:Pretty much- any non contact sport needs to keep a tight eye on this. Contact sports suffer the opposite problem, a mentality of playing on with an injury. A good ref shouldn't be impartial with regards to teams alone, but also to players within teams. I guess I've argued this with you about Ice Hockey a bit in the past, but the sport you didn't mention that's having big issues with this at the mo is American football.Army of GOD wrote:yea, if they're writing in supposed pain on the ground, the contact looks more malicious and you're more likely to get the call.
Or it could be like in baseball, where you argue not to change the umpires mind about the call that just happened, but you're arguing for a call to go your way in the future.
I'm not sure how much basketball you watch tgd, but I love Jeff Van Gundy who commentates for ESPN/ABC and is doing all the games for the finals. He thinks blatant floppers should either get a technical foul during the game or a hefty fine afterwards and I agree completely. It's not so bad in hockey, but football should adopt this policy too.
To my mind, faking an injury is pretty serious, but faking not having an injury when you have one is dangerous.
In the only serious injury of my sports career (an awfully sprained ankle), I wanted to get right back into the soccer game that it happened during, but my coach wouldn't let me. If I had pretending like I didn't have an injury, I would've been back in teh game doing a lot more harm to myself. But there's that feeling of helplessness sitting on the sidelines watching your teammates struggle in a game you think you could alter and it sucks (and I had to feel it the rest of the soccer season as I had to sit out for like 7 weeks).
That's what she said!Army of GOD wrote:That's a bit tangential to the topic of floppers though.
Oh yea, and ever since I sprained my ankle I've sprained my other one and twisted both of my ankles so many times that I need to wear braces pretty much any time I play sports.Symmetry wrote:But seriously, see a doctor.
Nah- that doesn't suck at all. Idiots who play hurt and never get medical advice cos they think it's macho to play through pain and end up severely injured, they don't play anymore.Army of GOD wrote:Oh yea, and ever since I sprained my ankle I've sprained my other one and twisted both of my ankles so many times that I need to wear braces pretty much any time I play sports.Symmetry wrote:But seriously, see a doctor.
shit sucks brah
Does your penis not fit in any shoes?huamulan wrote: I also play barefoot, because I am a man.

someone call a doctor, there are some SICK BURNS being delivered herejonesthecurl wrote:It could probably fit inside every thimble you own too.

jonesthecurl wrote:It could probably fit inside every thimble you own too.