Page 6 of 36
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 9:24 pm
by wicked
I guess 3 mafia and an SK sounds reasonable. I had "7" in my mind b/c I was worried about a speed lynch on Ank.
So Aim, you WANT a speed lynch?

Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 9:49 pm
by Guilty_Biscuit
Aimless wrote:Along those lines, I'd like to hear from Guilty_Biscuit and ML regarding their Narc votes.
Day 1 mind games Aim, day 1 mind games. You, btw, are in a far less defensible position. As the third voter, you are similar to the man behind the grassy knoll...
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:29 pm
by Aimless
wicked wrote:I guess 3 mafia and an SK sounds reasonable. I had "7" in my mind b/c I was worried about a speed lynch on Ank.
So Aim, you WANT a speed lynch?

I just said that if a speed lynch occurs, it'll give away three scum.
Guilty_Biscuit wrote:Aimless wrote:Along those lines, I'd like to hear from Guilty_Biscuit and ML regarding their Narc votes.
Day 1 mind games Aim, day 1 mind games. You, btw, are in a far less defensible position. As the third voter, you are similar to the man behind the grassy knoll...
Errr... that may be, but my vote had a reasoning behind it. I wanted to hear from you and ML, since I didn't see a reason for your vote other than "Narc put a 3rd vote on wicked." Basically, I want to hear from everyone on this bandwagon; I don't want an accidental lynch.
I'm more aware than anyone that my argument is weak; I don't particularly want to lynch Narc on the sole basis of it - at least, not yet. So, I'm poking people to get responses.
*poke, poke* You're voting Narc, too; if you've got a better reason, or even one to add to mine, I'd like to hear it.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:33 pm
by AK_iceman
Vote - Aimless
He's acting weird...
And this is a serious vote too.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:34 pm
by XenHu
Vote Count
4.Anarkistsdream(MountainLion, Guilty_Biscuit, Aimless, got tonkaed)
2.Aimless(Mandalorian2298, AK_Iceman)
2.wicked( Moz, Anarkistsdream)
1.AK_Iceman (wicked)
1.Mandalorian2298 (The1exile)
1.strike_wolf(Pancakemix)
1. Not Voting( Strike_wolf, )
With 12 alive it takes 7 to Lynch!
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:36 pm
by strike wolf
wicked wrote:So does anyone know anything about this Manhunt? Is it a movie or something?
Didn't you read the description?

Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:37 pm
by Aimless
AK_iceman wrote:Vote - AimlessHe's acting weird...
And this is a serious vote too.
Sigh...
Fine. I'll
Unvote. I still stick by my FOS on Narc, though.
Since you guys don't believe me, I'd like to hear what theories you have.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:38 pm
by XenHu
Vote Count
3.Anarkistsdream(MountainLion, Guilty_Biscuit, got tonkaed)
2.Aimless(Mandalorian2298, AK_Iceman)
2.wicked( Moz, Anarkistsdream)
1.AK_Iceman (wicked)
1.Mandalorian2298 (The1exile)
1.strike_wolf(Pancakemix)
2. Not Voting( Strike_wolf, Aimless)
With 12 alive it takes 7 to Lynch!
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:39 pm
by Aimless
Ha ha... making you work, Xen.

Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:40 pm
by AK_iceman
Aimless wrote:I just said that if a speed lynch occurs, it'll give away three scum.
Ok, we talked about how there is probably only 3 scum to begin with... but I don't understand how a speed lynch will reveal all 3 of them.

Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:42 pm
by Aimless
AK_iceman wrote:Aimless wrote:I just said that if a speed lynch occurs, it'll give away three scum.
Ok, we talked about how there is probably only 3 scum to begin with... but I don't understand how a speed lynch will reveal all 3 of them.

Well, there were four votes on Narc at the time. So if scum decided to try to speed lynch him, that would reveal three of them (it takes seven to lynch, after all). Basically, wicked was accusing me of putting Narc in a dangerous situation by leaving him at lynch -3; I responded that it was dangerous, but it would give us a big lead if scum did speed lynch him.
I'm apparently drawing a bunch of flak for that line of reasoning, though, so my vote is temporarily withdrawn.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:51 pm
by strike wolf
pancakemix wrote:I was going to unvote, but it appears strike wolf has yet to say anything since he commented on my vote for him, and I've been politely asked not to bandwagon, which I wasn't going to do anyway.
I can't help it if I have to prepare for mother's day.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:54 pm
by pancakemix
strike wolf wrote:pancakemix wrote:I was going to unvote, but it appears strike wolf has yet to say anything since he commented on my vote for him, and I've been politely asked not to bandwagon, which I wasn't going to do anyway.
I can't help it if I have to prepare for mother's day.
That makes sense.
Unvote
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:56 pm
by XenHu
Vote Count
3.Anarkistsdream(MountainLion, Guilty_Biscuit, got tonkaed)
2.Aimless(Mandalorian2298, AK_Iceman)
2.wicked( Moz, Anarkistsdream)
1.AK_Iceman (wicked)
1.Mandalorian2298 (The1exile)
3. Not Voting( Strike_wolf, Aimless, Pancakemix)
With 12 alive it takes 7 to Lynch!
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:58 pm
by wicked
strike wolf wrote: I can't help it if I have to prepare for mother's day.
FOS Strike. We all know you were raised by wolves!
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:00 pm
by wicked
Aimless wrote: I don't want an accidental lynch.
And yet you're content to leave your vote on there? Yeah right.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:01 pm
by wicked
sorry for the triple post... I see now Aim has unvoted.... amid much pressure.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:03 pm
by wicked
The only people who speed lynch are noobs. You're not going to get that here Aim. nice try though.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:03 pm
by Aimless
wicked wrote:Aimless wrote: I don't want an accidental lynch.
And yet you're content to leave your vote on there? Yeah right.
Sigh. I
said I unvoted. But yeah, I was content. Lynch -3 is not imminent danger of a lynch unless the mafia tries a speed lynch, and on day one that's pretty dumb.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:05 pm
by pancakemix
I'm slightly suspicious of Aimless. But only slightly. FOS Aimless. I would probably vote him if I didn't know that his mind is probably fired by finals.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:10 pm
by Aimless
wicked wrote:The only people who speed lynch are noobs. You're not going to get that here Aim. nice try though.
Exactly! So, why was I taking so much flak for leaving my vote on? Hell, mine wasn't even the fourth vote; tonka's was.
I really don't understand this argument against me. I could see making a case against me if you thought I was pushing to hard on a weak rationale, but basing a case off of the fact that I
voted that rationale?
Crap. Now I'm getting defensive. Bah.
I'll leave well enough alone, for now. I still think Narc is the most suspicious player at the moment; but I'll back off and let the rest of you hash it out for a while.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:10 pm
by pancakemix
pancakemix wrote:I'm slightly suspicious of Aimless. But only slightly. FOS Aimless. I would probably vote him if I didn't know that his mind is probably fried by finals.
Edit in Italics.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:11 pm
by Aimless
pancakemix wrote:I would probably vote him if I didn't know that his mind is probably fired by finals.
Amen.
Fortunately, they're over on Monday.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:13 pm
by strike wolf
Well, Im going to stay out of the voting and FOSing column for a little longer. There are some people that I am suspicious of but I also think that the real mafia may be the one's who haven't posted anything of importance yet and generally stayed out of the limelight.
As far as Aimless goes, I am not sure if he has a secret agenda or not. I do know that his comments have showed logic at least to some level.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:14 pm
by wicked
Sorry Aim... guess I just misunderstood your rationale for wanting a speed lynch. I don't know if Ank's scum or not, hence me not wanting to be tied to him... or any other player for that matter. lol
And what I meant is I was *hoping* we didn't have anyone here that would make a noob mistake... although you never know, so better safe than sorry.