Conquer Club

Blitzaholic wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:ok, these may take me a few days unless others can post some info.


these are some suggestions that a lot have mentioned and will take into account some of these, was wondering which ones you all felt were more important.


i will add what i can, trying to put in the ones that are a bit easier to research, ok

other ideas are

top 5 negative feedbacks---dont really want to reward negativity

top 5 multi tourney winners-not sure there is 5 multiple winners, spidey and mm17 have 2

top 5 most rounds-this one i am investigating and will add sometime

top 5 - to + feedback ratio--maybe

top 5 who created the most maps-will add if i can know more-dim, others?

top 5 jr's leet 10-1st 5, not sure-still new and waiting for any impact if at all to others

top 5 beats on blitz--lol, no, then all could name names to much to keep track of

top 5 most armies in 1 game-not sure, slows site too much

top 5 armies on 1 territory-same as above

top 5 + feedbacks with 0 negatives-maybe

top 5 spank you very much games, funny but hard to prove

top 5 non-premium members scores-not sure, may have used premium to get there? how does this work?

top 5 head to head? maybe, again may be too many of these, keep it simple, we dont want like 50 different names of players against each other, to much to keep track of

top 5 mafia games modded-maybe

1st 5 on jr's ignore list-lol, no, guessing this was joke

1st 5 to sleep with wicked, lol, no-sure this was joke-keep it risk related

1st to 500 1 on 1 games-can be added once there is 5, jr is 1 need 4 more

1st was to rank #1 on site, will be added but so hard to know, maybe have to say 1st 5 #1 site of 3K or higher, but we have this, hard to proof otherwise, i think brunnings was the 1st to 2K but not sure after that, ugh


some may still be up for grabs


any help would be nice, ty


or any others ideas to expand, please post, ty for your time

i like how some of you matey's are thinking

added others, some from pm's and some posts

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:first 5 to

500 single wins
500 double wins
500 triple wins

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:first 5 to

500 single wins
500 double wins
500 triple wins

I think thats a good one but with the stipulation they must be 3 player+ singles games. 1 v1 are fun but they are garbage compared with 5/6 player games and shouldnt be taken seriously.

AAFitz wrote:Well why not ignore the whole debate on that

Top 5 wins in doubles

Top five wins in Triples

Top five wins in 6pl

Top 5 wins in 5pl

Top five wins in 4pl

Top five wins in 3pl

Top five wins in 2pl

each one of those is a different game essentially...5 and 6 are close, and 4 and 3 and 4 are close, but still very different especially in escalating

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:first 5 to

500 single wins
500 double wins
500 triple wins

I think thats a good one but with the stipulation they must be 3 player+ singles games. 1 v1 are fun but they are garbage compared with 5/6 player games and shouldnt be taken seriously.

disagree

games are either singles/doubles/triples. does not matter the quantity of players per game.

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:first 5 to

500 single wins
500 double wins
500 triple wins

I think thats a good one but with the stipulation they must be 3 player+ singles games. 1 v1 are fun but they are garbage compared with 5/6 player games and shouldnt be taken seriously.

disagree

games are either singles/doubles/triples. does not matter the quantity of players per game.

Winning 500 1v1 games means nothing other than attrition,winning 500 5/6 player games would be an achievement

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:first 5 to

500 single wins
500 double wins
500 triple wins

I think thats a good one but with the stipulation they must be 3 player+ singles games. 1 v1 are fun but they are garbage compared with 5/6 player games and shouldnt be taken seriously.

disagree

games are either singles/doubles/triples. does not matter the quantity of players per game.

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
catch my drift?

Robinette wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:first 5 to

500 single wins
500 double wins
500 triple wins

I think thats a good one but with the stipulation they must be 3 player+ singles games. 1 v1 are fun but they are garbage compared with 5/6 player games and shouldnt be taken seriously.

disagree

games are either singles/doubles/triples. does not matter the quantity of players per game.

And for JR the QUALITY of opponents doesn't matter either...

comic boy wrote:Are all us welcome

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:me and Robin are good friends. we just have a funny way of showing public affection for one another. In person she is fun to hold and cuddle with when we are alone.

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

comic boy wrote:Are all us welcome

absolutely

let me check my ignore list. hold on a couple seconds. its not that long


>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

its not looking too good for you

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:first 5 to

500 single wins
500 double wins
500 triple wins

I think thats a good one but with the stipulation they must be 3 player+ singles games. 1 v1 are fun but they are garbage compared with 5/6 player games and shouldnt be taken seriously.

disagree

games are either singles/doubles/triples. does not matter the quantity of players per game.

Blitzaholic wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:first 5 to

500 single wins
500 double wins
500 triple wins

I think thats a good one but with the stipulation they must be 3 player+ singles games. 1 v1 are fun but they are garbage compared with 5/6 player games and shouldnt be taken seriously.

disagree

games are either singles/doubles/triples. does not matter the quantity of players per game.

comic and jr it doesnt matter here guys

the debate is over cause the 1st 5 to win 500 singles happened before 1 on 1 games existed on here, but i do separate 1 on 1's vs singles as two different catergories

i think this will be very time consuming to find the 1st to win 500 singles, doubles and triples and 1 on 1's, i know the 1st to win 500 triples was me, then osujacket and jr maybe 3rd and jork 4th, yuma 5th, almost the same order as the 1st to play 500 trips

doubles to win 500 1st i am sure it was eye84 free 1st, then would have to count up all the others and look at the dates and data which will over take me about a week if i spent 10 hours a day on it

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

comic boy wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:first 5 to

500 single wins
500 double wins
500 triple wins

I think thats a good one but with the stipulation they must be 3 player+ singles games. 1 v1 are fun but they are garbage compared with 5/6 player games and shouldnt be taken seriously.

disagree

games are either singles/doubles/triples. does not matter the quantity of players per game.

comic and jr it doesnt matter here guys

the debate is over cause the 1st 5 to win 500 singles happened before 1 on 1 games existed on here, but i do separate 1 on 1's vs singles as two different catergories

i think this will be very time consuming to find the 1st to win 300 singles, doubles and triples and 1 on 1's, i know the 1st to win 500 triples was me, then osujacket and jr maybe 3rd and jork 4th, yuma 5th, almost the same order as the 1st to play 500 trips

doubles to win 500 1st i am sure it was eye84 free 1st, then would have to count up all the others and look at the dates and data which will over take me about a week if i spent 10 hours a day on it

Mickeys ticking.

on Wed. I look forward to the results

AAFitz wrote:Well why not ignore the whole debate on that

Top 5 wins in doubles

Top five wins in Triples

Top five wins in 6pl

Top 5 wins in 5pl

Top five wins in 4pl

Top five wins in 3pl

Top five wins in 2pl

each one of those is a different game essentially...5 and 6 are close, and 4 and 3 and 4 are close, but still very different especially in escalating

Blitzaholic wrote:

Blitzaholic wrote:ok, these may take me a few days unless others can post some info.


these are some suggestions that a lot have mentioned and will take into account some of these, was wondering which ones you all felt were more important.


i will add what i can, trying to put in the ones that are a bit easier to research, ok

other ideas are

top 5 negative feedbacks---dont really want to reward negativity

top 5 multi tourney winners-not sure there is 5 multiple winners, spidey and mm17 have 2

top 5 most rounds-this one i am investigating and will add sometime

top 5 - to + feedback ratio--maybe

top 5 who created the most maps-will add if i can know more-dim, others?

top 5 jr's leet 10-1st 5, not sure-still new and waiting for any impact if at all to others

top 5 beats on blitz--lol, no, then all could name names to much to keep track of

top 5 most armies in 1 game-not sure, slows site too much

top 5 armies on 1 territory-same as above

top 5 + feedbacks with 0 negatives-maybe

top 5 spank you very much games, funny but hard to prove

top 5 non-premium members scores-not sure, may have used premium to get there? how does this work?

top 5 head to head? maybe, again may be too many of these, keep it simple, we dont want like 50 different names of players against each other, to much to keep track of

1st 5 to 500 1 on 1 games-can be added once there is 5

1st 5 to win 500 triples

1st 5 to win 500 doubles

1st 5 to win 250 singles standard 3,4,5,6 player

1st 5 to win 100 singles standard 6 player



some may still be up for grabs


any help would be nice, ty


or any others ideas to expand, please post, ty for your time

i like how some of you matey's are thinking