Bible Prophecy

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:50 pm

That's the problem with new posters; you can never tell whether they're being sarcastic or actually believe some of the crap they spout...

svtoflord · Post by **svtoflord** » Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:13 pm

unriggable wrote:
svtoflord wrote:
unriggable wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Guiscard wrote: And remind me exactly how Moses crossed the Red Sea... Was a dam involved then?

That was a miracle by God. God parted the Red Sea when Moses lifted his staff. No dam involved here.
Prove it without using your Bible that it actually happened.
How about I prove it. I've heard of a volcano erupted several hundreds of miles away. It destroyed a civilization and was somehow connected to the river. The blood of all of those people went down the river turning it into blood. This cannot be a coincidence if this valcano story is true..
Blood burns, buddy, it's an organic molecule. It becomes a scab-like substance when the water from the cells and the plasma evaporates. It's not like blood was everywhere after the incident in Pompeii...

FYI I was talking about parting the red sea. Seeing as how jay can't provide any evidence whatsoever, I'll assume he conceded, which he obviously didn't.

Sorry about that, I thought of that instead. All well,...

DaGip · Post by **DaGip** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:39 am

If you listen to Bible Coders...Hillary is going to be the next president and is referred to as "The Whore of Babylon". I think that Bible Code stuff is just seeing what you want...though there has been studies done, but I am not sure to what extent. I don't know, if the Bible Code is for real, how did it come about? Does it have something to do with the I-Ching system of divination?

Jenos Ridan · Post by **Jenos Ridan** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:04 am

jay_a2j wrote: If you two ever read it, you'd know that most of the prophecies within could not have happened in the past, we did not have the technology for them to be fulfilled. Example: The Army of the East crossing the Euphrates River. This would have been impossible until they built the dam on the Euphrates in order to stop the flow of water and dry up the river bed.

Ok, now you've lost me: How again did Alexander then proceed to conquer Persia and eastwards to the Indus if the Euphrates would have stopped him?

This was a blunder alright.

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:08 am

Jenos Ridan wrote:
jay_a2j wrote: If you two ever read it, you'd know that most of the prophecies within could not have happened in the past, we did not have the technology for them to be fulfilled. Example: The Army of the East crossing the Euphrates River. This would have been impossible until they built the dam on the Euphrates in order to stop the flow of water and dry up the river bed.
Ok, now you've lost me: How again did Alexander then proceed to conquer Persia and eastwards to the Indus if the Euphrates would have stopped him?

This was a blunder alright.

Let me re-phrase...... crossed "on dry ground".

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:18 am

svtoflord wrote:
unriggable wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Guiscard wrote: And remind me exactly how Moses crossed the Red Sea... Was a dam involved then?
That was a miracle by God. God parted the Red Sea when Moses lifted his staff. No dam involved here.
Prove it without using your Bible that it actually happened.
How about I prove it. I've heard of a volcano erupted several hundreds of miles away. It destroyed a civilization and was somehow connected to the river. The blood of all of those people went down the river turning it into blood. This cannot be a coincidence if this valcano story is true..

Who the hell is this uber-n00b, and what is he talking about? Is he being serious and trying to type coherent prose? Or is he just randomly thumping his keypad against his bedroom wall like some kind of wiffle-board so that random letters come out?

Jenos Ridan · Post by **Jenos Ridan** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:26 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Jenos Ridan wrote:
jay_a2j wrote: If you two ever read it, you'd know that most of the prophecies within could not have happened in the past, we did not have the technology for them to be fulfilled. Example: The Army of the East crossing the Euphrates River. This would have been impossible until they built the dam on the Euphrates in order to stop the flow of water and dry up the river bed.
Ok, now you've lost me: How again did Alexander then proceed to conquer Persia and eastwards to the Indus if the Euphrates would have stopped him?

This was a blunder alright.

Let me re-phrase...... crossed "on dry ground".

Ok, now I'm begining to see it.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:30 am

Ah, ever heard of a bridge?

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:31 am

Skittles! wrote:Ah, ever heard of a bridge?

Yeah, but its one card game I never learned to play.

(Oh, and a bridge isn't "dry ground")

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:37 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Ah, ever heard of a bridge?
Yeah, but its one card game I never learned to play.

(Oh, and a bridge isn't "dry ground")

A bridge made of clay?

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:47 am

Skittles! wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Ah, ever heard of a bridge?
Yeah, but its one card game I never learned to play.

(Oh, and a bridge isn't "dry ground")
A bridge made of clay?

You might have something there!

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:47 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Ah, ever heard of a bridge?
Yeah, but its one card game I never learned to play.

(Oh, and a bridge isn't "dry ground")

Considering the number of quite major passages in the Bible that are open to interpretation (Thou Shalt Not Kill is actually Thou Shalt Kill If Thou Can Get The Government To Declare That It's Ok, apparently) I don't see how you get to declare this one to be completely literal.

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:49 am

Neutrino wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Ah, ever heard of a bridge?
Yeah, but its one card game I never learned to play.

(Oh, and a bridge isn't "dry ground")
Considering the number of quite major passages in the Bible that are open to interpretation (Thou Shalt Not Kill is actually Thou Shalt Kill If Thou Can Get The Government To Declare That It's Ok, apparently) I don't see how you get to declare this one to be completely literal.

Nope. Thou shall not kill means, thou shall not kill.

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:53 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Ah, ever heard of a bridge?
Yeah, but its one card game I never learned to play.

(Oh, and a bridge isn't "dry ground")
Considering the number of quite major passages in the Bible that are open to interpretation (Thou Shalt Not Kill is actually Thou Shalt Kill If Thou Can Get The Government To Declare That It's Ok, apparently) I don't see how you get to declare this one to be completely literal.
Nope. Thou shall not kill means, thou shall not kill.

What about war?
I can't remember if it was you or not, but one of the Christian debaters here declared that war gave you a free pass.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:53 am

jay_a2j wrote:Nope. Thou shall not kill means, thou shall not kill.

Well then, America and all the other nations in the world are fucked then, aren't we?

Oh yeah, God is fucked via that rule as well. Y'know, the flood and all.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:53 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Ah, ever heard of a bridge?
Yeah, but its one card game I never learned to play.

(Oh, and a bridge isn't "dry ground")
Considering the number of quite major passages in the Bible that are open to interpretation (Thou Shalt Not Kill is actually Thou Shalt Kill If Thou Can Get The Government To Declare That It's Ok, apparently) I don't see how you get to declare this one to be completely literal.
Nope. Thou shall not kill means, thou shall not kill.

In our language, yes. But I doubt you've read the original bible, or even understand the language it was written in.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:56 am

Neutrino wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Ah, ever heard of a bridge?
Yeah, but its one card game I never learned to play.

(Oh, and a bridge isn't "dry ground")
Considering the number of quite major passages in the Bible that are open to interpretation (Thou Shalt Not Kill is actually Thou Shalt Kill If Thou Can Get The Government To Declare That It's Ok, apparently) I don't see how you get to declare this one to be completely literal.
Nope. Thou shall not kill means, thou shall not kill.
What about war?
I can't remember if it was you or not, but one of the Christian debaters here declared that war gave you a free pass.

Because it's in the name of God!

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:54 am

jay_a2j wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Ah, ever heard of a bridge?
Yeah, but its one card game I never learned to play.

(Oh, and a bridge isn't "dry ground")
Considering the number of quite major passages in the Bible that are open to interpretation (Thou Shalt Not Kill is actually Thou Shalt Kill If Thou Can Get The Government To Declare That It's Ok, apparently) I don't see how you get to declare this one to be completely literal.
Nope. Thou shall not kill means, thou shall not kill.

It's actually Thou Shalt Not Murder, that's why we came up with manslaughter.

AlgyTaylor · Post by **AlgyTaylor** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:58 am

The bible predicts all sorts of things. For example, last week the roof at my place of work leaked and water fell on the floor, creating a "great flood". When I came in on Wednesday the first thing I thought was "No! Argh!", which is a bit like Noah. Not only that, but it ruined a PAIR of computer MICE!! Pair of animals, see!

Not only that, but the computer itself managed to survive. It's only used to access the internet, which used to be called the Arpanet, which sounds a bit like Ark-and-net - you could've easily been confused by it if you'd never heard of Arpanet, since you might well have a big net on board a ship.

Ever thought that you can apply bible stories to practically anything with very little effort?

AlgyTaylor · Post by **AlgyTaylor** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:59 am

I've very little time for these type of prophecies/conspiracy theories

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:21 pm

Neutrino wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Ah, ever heard of a bridge?
Yeah, but its one card game I never learned to play.

(Oh, and a bridge isn't "dry ground")
Considering the number of quite major passages in the Bible that are open to interpretation (Thou Shalt Not Kill is actually Thou Shalt Kill If Thou Can Get The Government To Declare That It's Ok, apparently) I don't see how you get to declare this one to be completely literal.

The commandment is not thou shalt not kill. Anyone with any basic knowledge of hebrew will confirm.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:24 pm

not that i disagree with you napoleon, just when i read your post i chuckled....

how many people do you know with more than a basic knowledge of hebrew....i think i know like 5.

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:24 pm

Shalom!

freezie · Post by **freezie** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:32 pm

DaGip wrote: AbaddonApollyon
Osamabynlladdon

S P O M

Looks like spam.

Is the spam the end of the world?!

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:47 pm

AlgyTaylor wrote:I've very little time for these type of prophecies/conspiracy theories

No, really? I'd never have guessed.

Bible Prophecy

Who is the Beast of Revelation?

Re: Bible Prophecy