Moderator: Cartographers
Sir. Ricco wrote:I don't know how you did it but you improved on the last update. This map, in my opinion, has the est graphics of any map i have seen on CC.




Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:but I think you missed the ball on this attempt RJ

I like your thinking catfishjohnson. You are exactly correct. however, I'll give it a few days before I do anything else drastic.CatfishJohnson wrote:The thing is man, the colder water is the blue/purple it is, and iceland is in a very norther region so the ocean surronding it is extrememly cold, yet the water INSIDE, is super heated by geothermal energy so i think a inbetween blue green OR maybe a darkblue purplish...


Yes I thought so as well. I know the xml can handle the Icelandic characters, but i'm not sure if the general playing cc'ers will go for it. A lot of people (including myself) don't know how to pronounce those characters, so it's kind of hard to verbalize in your head your attack plans. But, those characters are true to Iceland, and that should be considered as well. I'm leaning towards the normal 26 english characters though - I think there's actually a rule about all map names being in english?The Viking wrote:Looks great, though I think you should either have the Icelandic characters (ö, þ, æ, etc.) everywhere appropriate or nowhere at all.

I don't think there's a rule for names to be in English. I remember that when I was doing the Malta map people insisted to have names in Maltese!RjBeals wrote:Yes I thought so as well. I know the xml can handle the Icelandic characters, but i'm not sure if the general playing cc'ers will go for it. A lot of people (including myself) don't know how to pronounce those characters, so it's kind of hard to verbalize in your head your attack plans. But, those characters are true to Iceland, and that should be considered as well. I'm leaning towards the normal 26 english characters though - I think there's actually a rule about all map names being in english?The Viking wrote:Looks great, though I think you should either have the Icelandic characters (ö, þ, æ, etc.) everywhere appropriate or nowhere at all.
Both colours are nice but I agree that the blue one conveys more that sense of coldness that is found in the Icelandic waters...RjBeals wrote:I like your thinking catfishjohnson. You are exactly correct. however, I'll give it a few days before I do anything else drastic.CatfishJohnson wrote:The thing is man, the colder water is the blue/purple it is, and iceland is in a very norther region so the ocean surronding it is extrememly cold, yet the water INSIDE, is super heated by geothermal energy so i think a inbetween blue green OR maybe a darkblue purplish...
me 2AndyDufresne wrote:Agreed with the above post...that is what I voted for.
--Andy

Herakilla wrote:srry for not responding before
maybe if there is one singularly prosperous location over the others you can make it a bonus by itself and then make it start neutral thus bringing you down to 35 territories and avoid that disaster with 2 and 3 player games
I appreciate your suggestion, but I really don't want to do that. I don't want any gimmicks on this map. That includes Neutrals. I think 36 territories is a fair start - it may result in some unfair starting turns - but thats a risk I'm willing to take.Herakilla wrote:Herakilla wrote:srry for not responding before
maybe if there is one singularly prosperous location over the others you can make it a bonus by itself and then make it start neutral thus bringing you down to 35 territories and avoid that disaster with 2 and 3 player games

Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
