Moderator: Cartographers
yes thats what i was thinking, support the masses me thinks - even though it might not be technically correctMrBenn wrote:I've voted to start over, focussing on the central area of London that people know and visit...
...while we know that places like Hillingdon and Croydon are technically London, they aren't the places I think of when people say "I've been to London"...
yes, it leaves more options and i think would make the map brighter and more attractive with all the parks and thingsOgrecrusher wrote:The central London area is a good one and gets my vote. There's a lot you could do with that too.
lolbryguy wrote:wow it is big![]()
![]()
![]()
cant wait for the revamped version
central london, its just that people want a touristy map??sam_levi_11 wrote:so are u only doing the borough of city of london and not the others? if so its half arsed in my opinion
sam_levi_11 wrote:so are u only doing the borough of city of london and not the others? if so its half arsed in my opinion
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
hmm...thats the thing, it might be having a "make-over"gimil wrote:Can we have the page of the latest version in the title please?
As far as I can see you're the only 2 who think the whole would be better. I'm a Londoner and the central would be far more fun. The NYC map is amazing, I'd like something that can compare in quality to that, with local flavour. A map of the London boroughs could just be a generic small map of anywhere.sam_levi_11 wrote:cena, yet another londoner agrees with me and not you, t-o-m, havent u worjed out yet, people want all of london. it would be like doing an british map and only including the south of england because thats what other people think of.....
ok I dont mind having a central london map as long as it is called central london.Ogrecrusher wrote:As far as I can see you're the only 2 who think the whole would be better. I'm a Londoner and the central would be far more fun. The NYC map is amazing, I'd like something that can compare in quality to that, with local flavour. A map of the London boroughs could just be a generic small map of anywhere.sam_levi_11 wrote:cena, yet another londoner agrees with me and not you, t-o-m, havent u worjed out yet, people want all of london. it would be like doing an british map and only including the south of england because thats what other people think of.....
thats exactly what i thoughtcena-rules wrote:ok I dont mind having a central london map as long as it is called central london.Ogrecrusher wrote:As far as I can see you're the only 2 who think the whole would be better. I'm a Londoner and the central would be far more fun. The NYC map is amazing, I'd like something that can compare in quality to that, with local flavour. A map of the London boroughs could just be a generic small map of anywhere.sam_levi_11 wrote:cena, yet another londoner agrees with me and not you, t-o-m, havent u worjed out yet, people want all of london. it would be like doing an british map and only including the south of england because thats what other people think of.....
I thought this was set up to be the londonboroughs
Awesome! Don't listen to the 2 doubters. 50% of the poll says go central, and I know it could be great!t-o-m wrote:mmm...i spose things change, might start a new thread? i dunno,
ah well, i really dont mind what ever i do, i just find nothing special about doing a london boroughs - it would be a fun map but i think that other people would prefer central london,
maybe london could be a "sequil" if this one goes well?
i will make a draft now...