Sierra_Leon wrote:I guess I'll translate that "LOL WUT" into my own words then:
Iliad wrote:I don't like how you go on the offensive and shift the attention straight to me as soon as I try to suggest we try a path other than yours. I won't stand for it
unvote vote Sierra
- What offensive? Is asking someone to actually contribute to the game and place a non-random vote considered 'going on the offensive? Especially if that person just posted that we should pursue a non-random lynch?
- What's wrong with a little attention? I'm getting plenty at the moment and I'm not complaining.
- You don't agree with me that lynching Mandy, who claimed vig, is a bad idea? Or are you referring to another path?
I was talking about the whole random day 1 lynch thing. This whole thing was started by me saying maybe we don't have to randomly lynch someone.
I take it you're answering the blue question there. I still don't see the logic behind your reasoning. Here's what I read into the discussion from mandy's claim up until your vote:
me - "I don't think we should lynch mandy. random vote militant."
you - "I don't think we should lynch randomly."
me - "That sounds good. Lead the way."
you - "OMG what are you looking at me for?! vote sierra"
As far as I can tell, I was very much on the same path as you were. So I don't see your point where you say "as soon as I try to suggest we try a path other than yours".
It would be nice if you replied to the red and purple questions too.
If you didn't see I was having a bit of a joke. I was just trying to find a pretext for voting you. Ask for a vote and you shall receive. It was a joke
Ah I see. Well, I wasn't joking. And you look to be back-tracking. Which means that as far as I'm concerned, this is a good time to stop random voting.
Sierra_Leon wrote:Ah I see. Well, I wasn't joking. And you look to be back-tracking. Which means that as far as I'm concerned, this is a good time to stop random voting.
Unvote, vote Iliad.
Read the post. You're worse than wicked when it comes not to seeing jokes. I'm not backtracking I'm explaining a joke. If you really think that was a serious vote on you
Just read the post. (You need a new sarcasm detector)
Sierra_Leon wrote:Ah I see. Well, I wasn't joking. And you look to be back-tracking. Which means that as far as I'm concerned, this is a good time to stop random voting.
Unvote, vote Iliad.
Read the post. You're worse than wicked when it comes not to seeing jokes. I'm not backtracking I'm explaining a joke. If you really think that was a serious vote on you
Just read the post. (You need a new sarcasm detector)
Sorry, Illy... Sierra does make a good point. You really did seem genuine and now you are saying you were joking?
Unvote
Vote: Iliad
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Sounds like BS. Illy finds it offensive that SL dares to ask him who should be the non-random lynch, then only 2 posts after tries to pass it like a joke. Scumtell if I ever saw one. Unvote Vote Illy
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Obviously I'm not complaining about your voting Illy, he gave plenty of reason to do so himself. I did think the Sierra starting wagon was quite uncalled for and random though, as pointed out in your own reason for following it
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Iliad wrote:
We could...we could...break the system
Sorry, but I don't have a clue what you mean by that line.
Not have an random lynch. Sorry it wasn't clear
Ah ok, I see. Breaking the system sounds pretty exciting, so let's try it. Why don't you start off by placing a non-random vote?
I don't like how you go on the offensive and shift the attention straight to me as soon as I try to suggest we try a path other than yours. I won't stand for it
unvote vote Sierra
so you(and the lurking bandwagoners) htink this is serious?
I thought that bold part was enough to see that yes I was joking. I don't see how you can see the italic part as a serious attack on sierra.
And maybe it's a aussie thing, but I thought he was joking when I saw the comment to Sierra
If you knew he was joking and jumped on that, I think it's a viable enough lead
Still doesn't look like a joke to me. Looks like a poor and contradictory reason to vote someone disguised as a joke Meh, not sure.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
