Re: Return Mafia *Day 1*
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:54 pm
Okay?pmchugh wrote:I'm lazy ok ditto?
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://conquerclub.com/forum/
Okay?pmchugh wrote:I'm lazy ok ditto?
His was an obvious joke vote. I call this an overreaction.Serbia wrote:Unvote VOTE: XGS
(doesn't matter, not being counted anyway)
He's the latest to jump on the bandwagon, which serves no point. Therefore, suspicious. Vote the scummy scum-tellers! They are scum!
I agree with PCM, Scorp...I mean Acepmchugh wrote:Quite frankly what an awful post ace. *SLAP*AceArtemis wrote:That deserves a round of applause.XGSuperstar wrote: I suggest we start lynching scum.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Unvote, Vote: XGS for posting a line in ALL CAPS.XGSuperstar wrote: FRENCHIE CHAN BANDWAGON OMG![]()
![]()
You say something right, we should start scum hunting and not just random wagons and votes, and then you randomly vote the guy that suggested it![]()
unvote vote ace
Sorry, but no. If I was mafia, I wouldn't jump on the bandwagon right after my scumbuddy. I've played enough games to know that people get suspicious when weak non-random bandwagons grow too quickly. My vote was simply a random vote, nothing more.mandalorian2298 wrote:Scenario:
A Vet (let's call him 'Red Wing') and a Newbie (whom we shall refer to as 'Scorpio') are scum together. Vet casts a semi-serious vote, just to see if he can get the wagon rolling. Newbie, wanting to help his scum-buddy, but not wanting to appear connected with him, finds a lame, unconnected reason to follow up and vote the same player.
many...well i still conider nes a newbie...AceArtemis wrote:Sorry, but no. If I was mafia, I wouldn't jump on the bandwagon right after my scumbuddy. I've played enough games to know that people get suspicious when weak non-random bandwagons grow too quickly. My vote was simply a random vote, nothing more.mandalorian2298 wrote:Scenario:
A Vet (let's call him 'Red Wing') and a Newbie (whom we shall refer to as 'Scorpio') are scum together. Vet casts a semi-serious vote, just to see if he can get the wagon rolling. Newbie, wanting to help his scum-buddy, but not wanting to appear connected with him, finds a lame, unconnected reason to follow up and vote the same player.
BTW: How many games do I have to play before I am no longer considered a "newbie"?
Lolololololololollord voldemort wrote:mandy could be on to something as far as day 1 lynches go..
WEll it depends in most games, though in this one due to the amount from the past, you'll be a newbie no matter what since you joined past 07 XDAceArtemis wrote:Sorry, but no. If I was mafia, I wouldn't jump on the bandwagon right after my scumbuddy. I've played enough games to know that people get suspicious when weak non-random bandwagons grow too quickly. My vote was simply a random vote, nothing more.mandalorian2298 wrote:Scenario:
A Vet (let's call him 'Red Wing') and a Newbie (whom we shall refer to as 'Scorpio') are scum together. Vet casts a semi-serious vote, just to see if he can get the wagon rolling. Newbie, wanting to help his scum-buddy, but not wanting to appear connected with him, finds a lame, unconnected reason to follow up and vote the same player.
BTW: How many games do I have to play before I am no longer considered a "newbie"?
In all fairness, I haven't played here a long time, so, as far as I know, you might be the next Aimless. Sorry if I offended you.AceArtemis wrote:
BTW: How many games do I have to play before I am no longer considered a "newbie"?
So what do you call that? Meta-gaming? Or Micro-gaming? Whatever. More proof positive that our Bad Poet friend here is scumz0rs.mandalorian2298 wrote:BUT, I have been in a fair amount of games where my scum-buddies did thing like that.
I'm still a newbie, then...bugger.lord voldemort wrote:many...well i still conider nes a newbie...AceArtemis wrote:Sorry, but no. If I was mafia, I wouldn't jump on the bandwagon right after my scumbuddy. I've played enough games to know that people get suspicious when weak non-random bandwagons grow too quickly. My vote was simply a random vote, nothing more.mandalorian2298 wrote:Scenario:
A Vet (let's call him 'Red Wing') and a Newbie (whom we shall refer to as 'Scorpio') are scum together. Vet casts a semi-serious vote, just to see if he can get the wagon rolling. Newbie, wanting to help his scum-buddy, but not wanting to appear connected with him, finds a lame, unconnected reason to follow up and vote the same player.
BTW: How many games do I have to play before I am no longer considered a "newbie"?
your no longer a newbie when you play a game with good people and not be a dick or do something silly
lord voldemort wrote:many...well i still conider nes a newbie...AceArtemis wrote:Sorry, but no. If I was mafia, I wouldn't jump on the bandwagon right after my scumbuddy. I've played enough games to know that people get suspicious when weak non-random bandwagons grow too quickly. My vote was simply a random vote, nothing more.mandalorian2298 wrote:Scenario:
A Vet (let's call him 'Red Wing') and a Newbie (whom we shall refer to as 'Scorpio') are scum together. Vet casts a semi-serious vote, just to see if he can get the wagon rolling. Newbie, wanting to help his scum-buddy, but not wanting to appear connected with him, finds a lame, unconnected reason to follow up and vote the same player.
BTW: How many games do I have to play before I am no longer considered a "newbie"?
your no longer a newbie when you play a game with good people and not be a dick or do something silly
In only 2 days?Fircoal wrote:DEADLINE IN 48 HOURS ON SAT AT 12:00 PM PCT!
Generally speaking, when I refer to the memory of relevant events on which I base my actions and judgments, I call it 'experience'.Serbia wrote:So what do you call that? Meta-gaming? Or Micro-gaming? Whatever. More proof positive that our Bad Poet friend here is scumz0rs.mandalorian2298 wrote:BUT, I have been in a fair amount of games where my scum-buddies did thing like that.
You won't stick your vote on me thinking that the guy for whom you voted is scum?!pmchugh wrote:Good to see Lovo is as noob freindly as ever![]()
As for mady's case i don't buy it at all, if anything he seems more suspicious. But I wont stick my vote on you cause at least your trying to kickstart the game.
yes, I can basic math.dittoeevee8888 wrote:In only 2 days?Fircoal wrote:DEADLINE IN 48 HOURS ON SAT AT 12:00 PM PCT!
no one, it's a no lynch.captainwalrus wrote:Who is lynched at the deadline?
I never accused you of not being able to.Fircoal wrote:yes, I can basic math.dittoeevee8888 wrote:In only 2 days?Fircoal wrote:DEADLINE IN 48 HOURS ON SAT AT 12:00 PM PCT!
I don't really think your scum i just "if anything" "more suspicious" than acemandalorian2298 wrote:You won't stick your vote on me thinking that the guy for whom you voted is scum?!pmchugh wrote:Good to see Lovo is as noob freindly as ever![]()
As for mady's case i don't buy it at all, if anything he seems more suspicious. But I wont stick my vote on you cause at least your trying to kickstart the game.![]()
Wow, that's real big of you, dude!
This is one of the most non-understandable sentences I have ever read, dude.pmchugh wrote:I don't really think your scum i just "if anything" "more suspicious" than acemandalorian2298 wrote:You won't stick your vote on me thinking that the guy for whom you voted is scum?!pmchugh wrote:Good to see Lovo is as noob freindly as ever![]()
As for mady's case i don't buy it at all, if anything he seems more suspicious. But I wont stick my vote on you cause at least your trying to kickstart the game.![]()
Wow, that's real big of you, dude!
I read this as:mandalorian2298 wrote:This is one of the most non-understandable sentences I have ever read, dude.pmchugh wrote: I don't really think your scum i just "if anything" "more suspicious" than ace
For the record, you must be 14.dittoeevee8888 wrote:I read this as:mandalorian2298 wrote:This is one of the most non-understandable sentences I have ever read, dude.pmchugh wrote: I don't really think your scum i just "if anything" "more suspicious" than ace
I don't really think you're scum, just if anything, you're more suspicious than ace
But I have very little belief that I'm right.
Yeah.dittoeevee8888 wrote:I read this as:mandalorian2298 wrote:This is one of the most non-understandable sentences I have ever read, dude.pmchugh wrote: I don't really think your scum i just "if anything" "more suspicious" than ace
I don't really think you're scum, just if anything, you're more suspicious than ace
But I have very little belief that I'm right.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?mandalorian2298 wrote:This is one of the most non-understandable sentences I have ever read, dude.pmchugh wrote:I don't really think your scum i just "if anything" "more suspicious" than acemandalorian2298 wrote:You won't stick your vote on me thinking that the guy for whom you voted is scum?!pmchugh wrote:Good to see Lovo is as noob freindly as ever![]()
As for mady's case i don't buy it at all, if anything he seems more suspicious. But I wont stick my vote on you cause at least your trying to kickstart the game.![]()
Wow, that's real big of you, dude!