Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
Moderator: Community Team
Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
Just because I am arguing with him doesn't mean I am trying to get him lynched.captainwalrus wrote:Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
I'm just saying what I think about what he said. You can make of it what you will based on my inferences.spiesr wrote:So are you saying we should lynch the walrus then?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Im here, and more than most.captainwalrus wrote:Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
I actually think my argument was fairly solid but I've worked out that in mafia if you argue for long enough no one cares any more. It's stupid cause you cant get anyone lynched thats active hence why I rarely get lynched.sam_levi_11 wrote:Im here, and more than most.captainwalrus wrote:Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
Also i think this whole thing was rather pointless, pmc and thezz seemed to see things that werent there the further on they went. Neither seem particularly scummy, although i did find you use of the term "Who is winning" to be rather odd, its phrased, imo, almost like you know what their allignment is..
Why do I get ignored?sam_levi_11 wrote:Not sure, rereading Thezz does seem slightly more scummy, but again its hardly screaming at me, mainly because you both argued for so long it became a mess.
More concerning is that out of all live people, only 6 of us are posting - Squirrel, spiesr, me, pmc, walrus and thezz.
Rereading, considering 4 pages or so are based around you and thezz, it shows how little we have to go on.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
We have four pages of pmc and thezzz casting suspicion on each other, that has to be good for something right?sam_levi_11 wrote:Rereading, considering 4 pages or so are based around you and thezz, it shows how little we have to go on.
If you are that determined about it we could surely lynch you here to disprove that if you wanted.pmchugh wrote:It's stupid cause you cant get anyone lynched thats active hence why I rarely get lynched.
Because you are barely alive and certainly not sentient...pancakemix wrote:Why do I get ignored?
I didn't bring up who is winning, spiser did.sam_levi_11 wrote:Im here, and more than most.captainwalrus wrote:Sam_Levi for lurking and PMC for trying so hard to get thez lynched.spiesr wrote:Is there anyone who find to be particularly suspicious?
Also i think this whole thing was rather pointless, pmc and thezz seemed to see things that werent there the further on they went. Neither seem particularly scummy, although i did find you use of the term "Who is winning" to be rather odd, its phrased, imo, almost like you know what their allignment is..
And obviously I disagree.pmchugh wrote:I actually think my argument was fairly solid
The page before this you were complaining about spiesr's "who is winning" attitude, and now you decide to join him in choosing sides? What's with the inconsistency?sam_levi_11 wrote:I agree with spiesr, vote thezz to get the game moving.
"As good of choice as any"? We don't have a deadline right now. So we aren't pressed for a lynch. I find you pressing one very scummy. vote spiesrspiesr wrote:Well, I just looked back and decided that the best course of action is to get this game moving by placing a few votes on someone and forcing them to defend themselves. PMC's points have convinced me that thezzz is as good of choice as any. So vote THEZZZ.
Agreed.captainwalrus wrote:Vote spiser. PMC's arguments were not convincing, you are just trying to follow your scum buddy into a bandwagon.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Thezzaruz wrote: Could we get a VC and a prod of the inactives??
The accuser has become the accused, and rightly so. WE need prods so we have more than 7 people or so.Thezzaruz wrote:Interesting development...![]()
My arguments were good! Its obvious, he blames falko for no reason and gets him lynched. If ever i seen a scum tell thats one. If only i believed in tells.Mr. Squirrel wrote:The page before this you were complaining about spiesr's "who is winning" attitude, and now you decide to join him in choosing sides? What's with the inconsistency?sam_levi_11 wrote:I agree with spiesr, vote thezz to get the game moving."As good of choice as any"? We don't have a deadline right now. So we aren't pressed for a lynch. I find you pressing one very scummy. vote spiesrspiesr wrote:Well, I just looked back and decided that the best course of action is to get this game moving by placing a few votes on someone and forcing them to defend themselves. PMC's points have convinced me that thezzz is as good of choice as any. So vote THEZZZ.Agreed.captainwalrus wrote:Vote spiser. PMC's arguments were not convincing, you are just trying to follow your scum buddy into a bandwagon.
You might as well...pmchugh wrote:And dont make me get out my anti scum buddy argument.
Right, that way spiser won't be exposed as your scum buddy. Better get that defence out fast!spiesr wrote:You might as well...pmchugh wrote:And dont make me get out my anti scum buddy argument.
Has anyone ever seen me defend my scum buddy in a game where I am scum? No, but you have all (those who know me anyway) seen me defend people when a bad accusation is put at them, speisr was active and trying to get the game going, IMO he didn't do anything scummy and since I am town I have nothing to fear from saying this. However as a mafia member I would never risk it if speisr actually was my scum buddy, because if one of is turns up scum then you lot will go after the other.captainwalrus wrote:Right, that way spiser won't be exposed as your scum buddy. Better get that defence out fast!spiesr wrote:You might as well...pmchugh wrote:And dont make me get out my anti scum buddy argument.
Well, now you're WIFOMing your WIFOM. That's not exactly unscummy, now is it?pmchugh wrote:Has anyone ever seen me defend my scum buddy in a game where I am scum? No, but you have all (those who know me anyway) seen me defend people when a bad accusation is put at them, speisr was active and trying to get the game going, IMO he didn't do anything scummy and since I am town I have nothing to fear from saying this. However as a mafia member I would never risk it if speisr actually was my scum buddy, because if one of is turns up scum then you lot will go after the other.captainwalrus wrote:Right, that way spiser won't be exposed as your scum buddy. Better get that defence out fast!spiesr wrote:You might as well...pmchugh wrote:And dont make me get out my anti scum buddy argument.
Of course this is WIFOM but how stupid would I be to do that? Its far too risky a move and scum are always more careful.
These posts still hold legitimate concerns for me, as does his response:pancakemix wrote:So a discussion actually gets going and you call it distracting ourselves? Somehow, I think you don't want discussion.captainwalrus wrote:I think the mafia is winning. I don't think that either of them are actually scum, and they are just distracting themselves from trying to figure out who is scum.
Thez is not that scummy.
I'm not sure what to make of this. It's kind of random, and it's definitely not game-related. Unless, of course, you were trying to throw suspicion from yourself.captainwalrus wrote:Also, does the mafia ever get a busdriver?
Nothing in his earlier posts indicates any sort of ill will towards either side of the argument, but now it's decidedly against PMC. And even if he were just curious about the bus driver thing, why on earth bring it up?captainwalrus wrote:I just think that PMC was the only person who really thought thez was scummy and to me his argument seemed very weak, so I suggested that perhaps we should look at other things besides who PMC thinks is scummy.
And the busdriver thing I was just curious, and it didn't warrant like 4 replies.
Now we go from "I think he was wrong about his argument and shouldn't have been doing so much to push it" to not just an outright accusation, but accusation of two at once.captainwalrus wrote:Vote spiser. PMC's arguments were not convincing, you are just trying to follow your scum buddy into a bandwagon.
What does this even mean? (That's a serious question, CW. I can't decipher this)captainwalrus wrote:The accuser has become the accused, and rightly so. WE need prods so we have more than 7 people or so.Thezzaruz wrote:Interesting development...![]()
And again we have some very harsh accusations. Now who's pushing?captainwalrus wrote:Right, that way spiser won't be exposed as your scum buddy. Better get that defence out fast!spiesr wrote:You might as well...pmchugh wrote:And dont make me get out my anti scum buddy argument.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
It's interesting that you keep pushing that line when I've so clearly (and repeatedly) shown it to be untrue.pmchugh wrote:Its obvious, he blames falko for no reason and gets him lynched.
Thezzaruz wrote: Could we get a VC and a prod of the inactives??
We only have 8 players, and I've prodded cena....captainwalrus wrote:The accuser has become the accused, and rightly so. WE need prods so we have more than 7 people or so.Thezzaruz wrote:Interesting development...![]()