trestain wrote:xenhu ll i ave done is suspect you, why are you so keen to vote me out because you have given no info whatsever, at least i have tried to tell you why i was suspicious of you.
what exactly are your reaons xen
Read my past posts.
-X
trestain wrote:xenhu ll i ave done is suspect you, why are you so keen to vote me out because you have given no info whatsever, at least i have tried to tell you why i was suspicious of you.
what exactly are your reaons xen
you mean this xen, the fact that you think im to quiet when i HAVE been more vocal than you, a worry from bogus who can't even place it, and the fact that i accused you after you accused me.XenHu wrote:FOS: Trestain
-He's too quiet for my taste
-Assuming we go by the logic of four mafia, one in each zone plus one extra, he could be the mafia in the Towers..
-Bogus said:
And instead of proving his innocence, he was quick to jump on me..Bogusbet wrote:Trestain, you worry me, not sure why yet I cant pin, convince me fella.
Just my two cents.. I may very well upgrade to a vote soon..trestain wrote:
Xenhu just wondering did you think you were typing this to one of your mafia buddies for a second.
-X
You haven't proved why I should trust you, thus my vote stands..trestain wrote:you mean this xen, the fact that you think im to quiet when i HAVE been more vocal than you, a worry from bogus who can't even place it, and the fact that i accused you after you accused me.XenHu wrote:FOS: Trestain
-He's too quiet for my taste
-Assuming we go by the logic of four mafia, one in each zone plus one extra, he could be the mafia in the Towers..
-Bogus said:
And instead of proving his innocence, he was quick to jump on me..Bogusbet wrote:Trestain, you worry me, not sure why yet I cant pin, convince me fella.
Just my two cents.. I may very well upgrade to a vote soon..trestain wrote:
Xenhu just wondering did you think you were typing this to one of your mafia buddies for a second.
-X
I have told you the many times the reason why i asked you that question and that i did not suspect you then.
geez zen your argument is rock solid
now take your blinkers off and start looking again or the mafia will win this xen i am not mafia.
wicked wrote:Xen, NOBODY has proved why they should be trusted at this point. I know I pressed you to talk more and throw out theories, which you've done, but you don't need to stick to a vote with basically no evidence (that I've seen).XenHu wrote: You haven't proved why I should trust you
Vote Houssamwicked wrote:Xen, with whoever goes tonight, the remaining townies will look back at their voting/suspicions and act on that. So even if you don't get to lynch tres today, he may get lynched later. It's kinda silly to stick with a vote that's not going anywhere, and unless you can find something damning on tres, I doubt the vote tonight will be for him.
We don't know what's on Houssam's PM, as he has conveniently eluded and ignored that question multiple times. Houssam knows what's on mine, just because I posted a summary of it earlier when we were trying to figure things out. I'm positive either Houssam is lying, or there's a small chance he has a strange "suicide" role, but that just doesn't make sense.dagreatbroomhead wrote:OKay, for the wicked/hussam thing, since you seem to have the both last name, either a, one of you are lying, (not possible, you have knowledge of the others PM)
Master Bush wrote:No you are wrong. When most people were voting no Lynch or not voting at all, I was the one who said it would be dumb not to kill either Autoload or AK. I said it over and over again, that onc had to be lynched, so we could see who was lying about their role claims. I was all set to vote AK until autoload was picking up votes, and then AK coming out and saying that him and Rev used radios to talk as masons. I believed he was infact telling the truth, because me and cram also used radios as masons. That's why I changed my vote to autoload. It turns out that AK was a two-faced mason/mafia, which is why he knew about the radios. I was the 7th vote out of 8 to lynch him on the second day.Machiavelli wrote:I'm pretty sure you didnt start the movement to lynch AK.Master Bush wrote:Oooh, cool. I hope you were watching when I started the movement to lynch AK and autoload.trestain wrote:I'm watching you MB
good point, but its still a VERY bold move to claim someone's wife (or husband, whatever) hussam either needs really big heuvos or just got lucky that your real wife wasn't in the game. I also believe that relationships is the kind of theme of this one. like i am sure (this is all pregame, before it started) IC and his mason buddies were actually masons, but before the game started, IC was infected and hense the drama. i dunno, no vote for tonight only because i don't want to see anyone lynched before i can review again.wicked wrote:And it was IC who pressed me for details of my PM. Probably to help Houssam out.
It is possible though.dagreatbroomhead wrote:OKay, for the wicked/hussam thing, since you seem to have the both last name, either a, one of you are lying, (not possible, you have knowledge of the others PM)
I really think that Xen Hu is overplaying the noob card.XenHu wrote:wicked wrote:Xen, NOBODY has proved why they should be trusted at this point. I know I pressed you to talk more and throw out theories, which you've done, but you don't need to stick to a vote with basically no evidence (that I've seen).XenHu wrote: You haven't proved why I should trust you
Ok, I understand but look at this from my point,
Everyone thinks I'm a noob..
I pretty much killed dussle myself(by pointing out potential doctors)...
I jump on bandwagons cause I can't think of my own suspects...
I'd rather my vote go to someone whom I think is mafia, as opposed to what someone else thinks(and at this point, none of the other candidates have much evidence against them anyway((aside from this back-and-forth))...
My vote stands...
-X
-X