Moderator: Community Team
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
This is why the case on you first came to be. Stop it.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:why what? why do i feel like leaving this fight me and vodean had alone? because its getting us nowhere and apparently everyone wants to pressure him.pmchugh wrote:Why?Some7hingCLEVER wrote:agreed so lets put pressure on someone elsevodean wrote:at this point i am not ready to unvote clever, but i am ready to start putting some pressure in other places.
either MoB, leehar, chuck, betiko, or jonty. one of them. they seem to be the scummiest people (after the hippo, edoc, clever cartel). again, THEY ARE NOT ALL MAFIA (unless by some miracle they are) but it is worth looking into.lol i think shield is worth the claim.. so
unvote vote sg7
(Too many embedded quotes, had to remove some)everywhere116 wrote:Better than someone who hasn't seen them at all.
everywhere116 wrote:I just had a Philosoraptor moment. Could the bandwagon on Clever for being sheepish itself be a sheepish manuever?
everywhere116 wrote:Uhh...yeah.betiko wrote:jonty125 wrote:
I'm going to vote hippo, for rolefishing and if Leehar was scum I highly doubt he wouldn't get involved in two town lynches.
or not? a mafia that would play well would try to do that. and i don't see what's the harm in hippo's question. trying to fish for roles now gets people to be voted against? so asking sneaky questions makes you suspicious? a bit ridiculous. FOS jointy
Vote beitko.
everywhere116 wrote:Wow. I smell a jester.Nebuchadnezer wrote:Of course you defended yourself...any player in this game would...however, I don't have a better target right now.
everywhere116 wrote:Morpheus is dead.vodean wrote:another reason why i dont believe doom and jak is cuz they didnt nameclaim. so why should we believe them. if they didnt do it cuz theyre morpheus or the oracle or something, then the doc will save them. The only reason, therefore, to hide their names is fear of a counter-claim.
everywhere116 wrote:Dazza quit my game, too. I would assume something happened in his life to force him to drop his games.jonty125 wrote:I don't understand why you claimed. Is it because you were a) afraid of questioning b) fed up c) felt it was assumed 'cos dazza quit.vodean wrote:then i can be less questioned... or more because apparently looking through 70 pages of forum... if i really have an interesting role, why would dazza have been replaced without reason?.pmchugh wrote: WTH? Why the claim?
Unvote vote clever
everywhere116 wrote:He's been relatively active in other threads. He should be here shortly.
everywhere116 wrote:Is he actually in the movies?Nebuchadnezer wrote:Oh, come on....the kid? That character never even hit any of my lists, nor did I believe that was an actual character until chucks wiki link. The kid? Really? I've gotta think about this one...
everywhere116 wrote:@vodean "What! Accusing poor, lovable Bender of a crime? That's the last straw!"
Perhaps you are trying to get all the VTs to claim so you know who not to kill?DoomYoshi wrote:Case on vodean is bad on principle. Don't lynch someone the first day they get back after catching up.
I want all VTs to claim now. We don't want any chance of mafia hiding behind that claim. Any VT not claimed by tonight I will lynch when they try that claim.
everywhere116 wrote:I know that Neo is the main character of the Matrix films, but what is your role? Or are you not comfortable in revealing that information?DoomYoshi wrote:Ok, so nobody agrees on my VT mass claim. The only problem is that for every VT claim we don't do anything and we just continue with the game. We have, as a town, proven that VT claims go unchallenged. In all likeliness we have a mafia in there now or will.
I have deliberated for quite some time and I don't want to fully claim - but I must. I was hoping we could find agent smith before I claimed. I am hoping I am correct in my intuition that pmc is agent smith. I am Neo.
everywhere116 wrote:Very well. I won't pressure you guys.
everywhere116 wrote:Unvote vote vodeon
That's L-2 by my count.
everywhere116 wrote:If it's just a shot in the dark, why not vote for the person who is closest to lynch anyway?shieldgenerator7 wrote:Well, I don't know if my line of questioning was flawed (I really don't think it was), but I didn't exactly get the results I was looking for. Both vodean and S7C stated that they were not good lynch candidates because the case on the other person has more merit. I makes me wonder whether they're both scum trying to throw each other under the bus (wifom but still a possibility), or both town thinking the other is scum. Anyway, I'm guessing one of them is scum and I'll take a stab in the dark and say it's vodean. VOTE VODEAN
Yes I know this is inconsistent with what I said earlier about not voting vodean on principle of having to catch up just recently, just bear with me here
-SG7 ()
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
I could be in trouble soonshieldgenerator7 wrote:I have noted that everywhere has been posting one-liners too.

Just a note for later. Clever admits to sheeping someone else with his vote on SG7. Keep this in mind for later.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:ya im a vt but wasnt betico saying that you were scummy. idk this game is starting to get old. if you hammer me ok thats ok. i voted you because i thought the cases on me and vodean were dead. im pretty sure plenty of people have said that. why dont we question them. oh well.unvote
i wasnt following bindly. i had a reason how is that sheeping.jak111 wrote:Just a note for later. Clever admits to sheeping someone else with his vote on SG7. Keep this in mind for later.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:ya im a vt but wasnt betico saying that you were scummy. idk this game is starting to get old. if you hammer me ok thats ok. i voted you because i thought the cases on me and vodean were dead. im pretty sure plenty of people have said that. why dont we question them. oh well.unvote
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
I WILL FIND THAT GOAT!!!shieldgenerator7 wrote:Sheeping.
Now to go hide my goat....
I have no idea if Dozer is for sure in the game. (Meta-time!) I would guess that he is in the game...how would you have Tank and not Dozer? So he has to be here somewhere. It'll really get my goat, if Dozer got a power role...edocsil wrote:Neb, a question. Do you know if Dozer is here? I am hoping for some role PM flavor one way or another.
Who is Dozer and what does he have to do with the game?Nebuchadnezer wrote:I have no idea if Dozer is for sure in the game. (Meta-time!) I would guess that he is in the game...how would you have Tank and not Dozer? So he has to be here somewhere. It'll really get my goat, if Dozer got a power role...edocsil wrote:Neb, a question. Do you know if Dozer is here? I am hoping for some role PM flavor one way or another.
Sucks Big E, are you serious?everywhere116 wrote:Who is Dozer and what does he have to do with the game?Nebuchadnezer wrote:I have no idea if Dozer is for sure in the game. (Meta-time!) I would guess that he is in the game...how would you have Tank and not Dozer? So he has to be here somewhere. It'll really get my goat, if Dozer got a power role...edocsil wrote:Neb, a question. Do you know if Dozer is here? I am hoping for some role PM flavor one way or another.



If by "just" you mean back in day 1 then yes he did.vodean wrote:hippo, did you just claim?
Crikey Vodean, that explains everything. If you skimmed day one then your whole play is skew-wiff! Wanna go back and re-read?vodean wrote:hippo, did you just claim?



Haha, I thought we went over this a few times o.e...thechuck51 wrote:If by "just" you mean back in day 1 then yes he did.vodean wrote:hippo, did you just claim?
You can say they were thought out but they really don't look that way, when you just vote someone and don't even write a single line about what made them suspicious (or even highlight what someone else said) it looks like mindless BWing. I remember in Power Role Draft you came flying at me and made a great case (even if you were wrong) and it was a huge town tell. However in this game you have been posting nothing of substance what so ever, so I see what edoc meant about meta.everywhere116 wrote: My votes weren't random, they were usually thought out and were made considering what had been said, although I didn't want to mindlessly repeat what everyone else was saying (beitko was the exception. I voted for him because I thought his logic was poor, and was the first and only person to do it, so I did voice my concern there.)
I have very similar suspicions about everywhere. Looking at his past votes, he was voting for a lot of the "easy" lynches I feel, and not taking a big stance on the more significant cases. He is defaulting to "going after inactives" way too much this game and a whole lot of his posts were 1 liners.pmchugh wrote:You can say they were thought out but they really don't look that way, when you just vote someone and don't even write a single line about what made them suspicious (or even highlight what someone else said) it looks like mindless BWing. I remember in Power Role Draft you came flying at me and made a great case (even if you were wrong) and it was a huge town tell. However in this game you have been posting nothing of substance what so ever, so I see what edoc meant about meta.everywhere116 wrote: My votes weren't random, they were usually thought out and were made considering what had been said, although I didn't want to mindlessly repeat what everyone else was saying (beitko was the exception. I voted for him because I thought his logic was poor, and was the first and only person to do it, so I did voice my concern there.)