Moderator: Cartographers



Yes, this would be good to at least try out. I think it would be better than the full desaturation.TaCktiX wrote:I like 3, but I think it'd look best with a partial desaturation instead of the full one you have right now.
No! Bad TaCktiX! You are not entitled to an opinion other than mine, you know that!TaCktiX wrote:And I like the sea blue.




no worries, bruce. having a 2-region bonus in a corner of the map doesn't lead to many ways to win though. it simply ensures that this is the best part of the map to secure in the early stages and gives a consistent advantage to the one who has a good drop there (like classic oceania). with six 3-region and 4-region bonuses, which is already an extreme number, a tiny 2-region bonus in addition makes no sense at all.Bruceswar wrote:Sorry I missed responding to you. I just want to mention I really happen to like that there is a bunch of bonuses. It leads to many different ways to win this map given different drops.iancanton wrote:west estonia and islands estonia can be combined usefully, for example, to form a proper continent in the classic sense. islands estonia especially ought to be eliminated as a stand-alone bonus because of its small size and isolated location.


But Marble Sea won by a 5 vote margin...Bruceswar wrote:I have given people long enough to vote. I am going to go with the desat and blue sea.

Victor Sullivan wrote:But Marble Sea won by a 5 vote margin...Bruceswar wrote:I have given people long enough to vote. I am going to go with the desat and blue sea.
-Sully


Then why put up a poll in the first place? Ok people like this one better so I'm going to go with the other one...Bruceswar wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:But Marble Sea won by a 5 vote margin...Bruceswar wrote:I have given people long enough to vote. I am going to go with the desat and blue sea.
-Sully
Yes but I am the map maker. I hold the final vote.