PLAYER57832 wrote:I have an entirely different take on this, was taught something entirely different.
Well, to use the argument from authority, I trust the trained Archeologists with scientific motivations over anything any of you guys were ever taught in high school from books published in the 1920s or whatever.
PLAYER57832 wrote:However, as bk indicated, that this one guy got his archeological evidence wrong is no more proof of the invalidity of the idea than that Darwin getting some of his details wrong is enough to disprove evolution. These are all just people.
He didn't just get his facts wrong. He went into the process with an agenda that was later proven wrong. Despite this, he continues to claim he's right. Even together his evidences were extremely flimsy and stupid.
PLAYER57832 wrote:then you stomped on to declare I was changing things.
Uh... It's not me Player. Pretty much everyone else in that thread claimed you were changing things before I ever did. In the private forums you're known as the user who kills threads on long tangents and never admits when she's wrong.
And I never left the thread.
PLAYER57832 wrote:For me, I stick to what is said and proven. I have NEVER found a point where the Bible is actually false.
Except for prayer.
