Moderator: Community Team



pancakemix wrote:...da fuq?
Vote Cykrias
Methinks some are taking this too far.
So elementary dear Watson; Ragian and Pancakemix are scum partners! *Dramatic Music*pancakemix wrote:Maybe, but 36 hours is a specific amount of time. I'm not one to lynch someone in absentia either.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:leaving as the pressure grows.ckyrias wrote:unvote
i will be off the next 36 hours approximately. mod is notified.
scumtell




hey sorry i posted in vacation thread so sorry. i am moving today jsut wantedt o read up and ill post something more tonight.Ragian wrote:Well ... it's (almost) random pressure day. I usually go with one of the quiet ones to be honest. Neither CLEVER nor Shaggy has posted since Wednesday.
*tosses coin*
unvote vote shaggy
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobssafariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.
unvote
Day 1 usually ends up with some pretty weak case leading to a claim, I figure one is just as good as another. Moot point now that someone else has put him at L-2 I think.pmchugh wrote:Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobssafariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.
unvote) but why do you? Unless this is a reactions ploy then I don't see how we benefit from just getting a player to claim. There are going to be a lot of easy fake claims out there and after we get someone to claim what then?



Pretty weak? There is no real reason for it, at least when people give reasons and arguments (albeit weak ones) you can separate those hopping on the BW from those genuinely trying to do something. You know as well as anyone that if you get someone to claim for virtually no reason then you are back at square one, or else you pick someone on the BW to vote next. Right now I do not have enough to want BK to claim, and I am v surprised you are going along with this.safariguy5 wrote:Day 1 usually ends up with some pretty weak case leading to a claim, I figure one is just as good as another. Moot point now that someone else has put him at L-2 I think.pmchugh wrote:Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobssafariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.
unvote) but why do you? Unless this is a reactions ploy then I don't see how we benefit from just getting a player to claim. There are going to be a lot of easy fake claims out there and after we get someone to claim what then?


...really? Not my fault I've got other obligations...pretender77 wrote:i feel that although pancake has given us nothing to work with. hes gonnaa be their later in the game if an easy lynch is needed. unvote vote bk
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I think you're overreacting here, I never actually voted bk, I simply said I would be willing to vote him if we were going to.pmchugh wrote:Pretty weak? There is no real reason for it, at least when people give reasons and arguments (albeit weak ones) you can separate those hopping on the BW from those genuinely trying to do something. You know as well as anyone that if you get someone to claim for virtually no reason then you are back at square one, or else you pick someone on the BW to vote next. Right now I do not have enough to want BK to claim, and I am v surprised you are going along with this.safariguy5 wrote:Day 1 usually ends up with some pretty weak case leading to a claim, I figure one is just as good as another. Moot point now that someone else has put him at L-2 I think.pmchugh wrote:Whatttt? I understand the rest of these guys wanting a claim for no reason (cause they are noobssafariguy5 wrote:Well, are we going to pick BK as the person to claim? I'm willing to apply pressure if he is.
unvote) but why do you? Unless this is a reactions ploy then I don't see how we benefit from just getting a player to claim. There are going to be a lot of easy fake claims out there and after we get someone to claim what then?
unvote vote saf

Ragian wrote: I could just as well turn it around, saying that you're protecting your pancake scumbuddy by forcing BK to claim since scum know whose not scum (i.e. town/3rd party). It's doesn't really make sense at this point though. Is that what's called WIFOM?





OK. This is the first time I'm playing with many of you. I only have my clan games to go on, and they are often very similar on D1, because we all know each other so well. Gotta admit I was surprised to have so much attention come onto me for suggesting we move past the jokevote stage. That kind of a thing can give more information later on, for example on Day2.pershy wrote: I agree with what Safari guy just said. Ck could actually be a good person to pressure - but seems that BK is the one who is L-3. So what have you got to say for yourself BK?

