Page 7 of 43
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:35 pm
by sheepofdumb
Aimless wrote:sheepofdumb wrote:Wait, what? So you think I'm mafia because I would be likely to take narc out because he's a good player. I just want to make sure why you are FOSing me.
No. The FOS was in response to Narc's well known desire not to play in a game with you. Like I said, were the situation reversed, I would suspect Narc immediately; this way around, I'm not sure. It's possible that you would kill him out of revenge, but... I think that, all things considered, it's probably unlikely.
I don't want to rule it out, though, hence my "very small FOS."
I don't mind narc not wanting to play with me. It makes no difference to me. If he wants to not enjoy his game because I'm there then that's his fault. I do understand where your coming from though.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:38 pm
by lord twiggy1
Fircoal wrote:lord twiggy1 wrote:Vote: Guilty_Biscuit
why?
EDIT:sorry i edited this post. the following is what i edited out:
1.
Security level
2.
Bright Red:High
Maroon:Medium
Pale Red:Low
White:None
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:39 pm
by pancakemix
That explains everything.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:42 pm
by XenHu
lord twiggy1 wrote:Last edited by lord twiggy1 on 04 May 2007 22:40; edited 2 times in total
Don't edit posts!
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
-X
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:42 pm
by lord twiggy1
just a post count, i was bored so i did it and posted it
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:43 pm
by lord twiggy1
XenHu wrote:lord twiggy1 wrote:Last edited by lord twiggy1 on 04 May 2007 22:40; edited 2 times in total
Don't edit posts!
-X
oh ya, duh sorry, ill put it back to how it was.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:46 pm
by sheepofdumb
lord twiggy1 wrote:XenHu wrote:lord twiggy1 wrote:Last edited by lord twiggy1 on 04 May 2007 22:40; edited 2 times in total
Don't edit posts!
-X
oh ya, duh sorry, ill put it back to how it was.
What the heck? What is that chart supposed to mean? Don't edit posts ever. We lynched what's-his-face because he edited out the word 'bandwagon'.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:47 pm
by lord twiggy1
just look at it and youll know, and i fixed the edit to how it was.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:49 pm
by pancakemix
That... really didn't help at all...
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:49 pm
by sheepofdumb
lord twiggy1 wrote:just look at it and youll know, and i fixed the edit to how it was.
Stop editing it. It still doesn't make any sense.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:51 pm
by lord twiggy1
allright allright sory
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 11:23 pm
by MountainLion
Aimless wrote:If we have an SK, we also have a good Doc. I'm kind of against the SK theory at the moment, I think we're dealing with just one scum group, of probably 5-6 players.
MountainLion wrote:Final Note: There will be no Jester, Cult or Serial Killer in this game.
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 11:28 pm
by Colaalone
mandalorian2298 wrote:vote Colaalone
You thought that I would forget, didn't you
What the hell, lol?
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 11:32 pm
by Fircoal
Colaalone wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:vote Colaalone
You thought that I would forget, didn't you
What the hell, lol?
he said what he said above, he is scum.
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 12:09 am
by LSU Tiger Josh
Twig why are the ones with 0 posts in white as that would make them extra suspicious to me to being scum for not posting.
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 12:25 am
by lord twiggy1
thats a good point. ill update it and give you a new one
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 12:30 am
by lord twiggy1
Security level
Gold:Extremely Suspisious
Bright Red:High
Maroon:Medium
Pale Red:Low
White:None
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 12:35 am
by LSU Tiger Josh
Unvote
VOTE XENHU as he didn't just join the game in a takeover fashion and hasn't posted.
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 1:36 am
by Aimless
MountainLion wrote:Aimless wrote:If we have an SK, we also have a good Doc. I'm kind of against the SK theory at the moment, I think we're dealing with just one scum group, of probably 5-6 players.
MountainLion wrote:Final Note: There will be no Jester, Cult or Serial Killer in this game.
Well, I guess it's a good thing that we don't have a SK. On the other hand, that means we also don't have a good doc.
And I should really learn to read the rules, rather than skimming them.
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 1:39 am
by Aimless
As for twiggy - I get what he's trying to do, and I appreciate it, but two things would be nice. One, smaller image for your next one; some of us don't view the world in 80000 by 60000 resolution. And two, and explanation of the metric you used for to determine overall scumminess would be nice.
As for the post count thing; day one was too short to accuse people of submarining.
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 2:04 am
by lord twiggy1
i kind of just decided who was more of a security threat by my own judgement, i thought that if they had like only 1 or none, or a ton they were high, if they had a bunchbut not a ton they were medium, if they had a few they were either low or none.
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 4:35 am
by diddle
vote mandalorian
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 6:03 am
by Guilty_Biscuit
lord twiggy1 wrote:i kind of just decided who was more of a security threat by my own judgement, i thought that if they had like only 1 or none, or a ton they were high, if they had a bunchbut not a ton they were medium, if they had a few they were either low or none.
I think what you are doing is a good idea twiggy
HUGE BUT
It only took the lynchers
2 HOURS from the game starting to lynch duday - most people will not have had a chance to post much during that period. So your list will be more interesting after another couple of days.
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 6:09 am
by unriggable
Guilty_Biscuit wrote:lord twiggy1 wrote:i kind of just decided who was more of a security threat by my own judgement, i thought that if they had like only 1 or none, or a ton they were high, if they had a bunchbut not a ton they were medium, if they had a few they were either low or none.
I think what you are doing is a good idea twiggy
HUGE BUT
It only took the lynchers
2 HOURS from the game starting to lynch duday - most people will not have had a chance to post much during that period. So your list will be more interesting after another couple of days.
Which is why I only have 3 posts! Notice how I didn't vote for him. You guys take your time now...
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 7:46 am
by Talapus
It's still kinda early to point any fingers and know who the guilty party is....unless of course someone wants to volunteer. Any takers...
?