Moderator: Community Team
Ahh I seem to have missed this post when I gave my brief description. As far as the Doom and Benga's cases. OMGus is scummy. there wasn't a good reason behind it. Benga voted him because he didn't see the case on himself. Doom is pretty much following the Modus Operandi he has for all day one games. I don't really like it but I also see absolutely no case with him as of yet. So neither case seems overly strong at this point and Benga's claim seems fairly believable so I am not really tempted to vote right now. Since my fever has broken, I'll probably reread at least the last few pages of this thread and see if I missed anything that stands out.FloresDelMal wrote:omgus could be a noob mistake, granted, but i have seen nothing that could make him seem town, so are you just throwing this comment because IB and nag found your and neb behaviour scummy?DoomYoshi wrote:Although I am starting to think he is town.
FOS DY
As for my reason voting him still stands, he hasn't made a single coherent post yet, ah "i OMGUS coz im pissed" doesn't qualify as a contribution by my standards, also i find ridiculous that after everyone bothered to explain what an OMGUS vote is and how it is an scumtell he could persevere on this behaviour, good noobs learn fast, the rest screw us with their obtuseness. Also according his claim, he might not be the ripper, but he surely is not pro-town, and if he is a jester i could prefer to get it overAlfred Napier Blanchard
Blanchard, a 34 year old canvasser, who resided at 2 Rowland Grove, Rowland Road, Handsworth, was arrested in the Fox And Goose public house, Newton Row Aston, Birmingham, on 5 October 1888 after being overheard describing how he had committed the Whitechapel murders. According to the landlord of the Fox And Goose, Richard King, Blanchard entered the pub on Friday morning at about 11 o'clock and commenced drinking until quarter past 8 at night. He consumed about 5 and a half pints of beer. While in the pub, Blanchard struck up a conversation with the landlord and asked him what kind of detectives they had in Birmingham, the landlord replied that he believed them to be very clever men, to which Blanchard replied, 'It would be a funny thing if the Whitechapel murderer were to give himself up in Birmingham', before declaring, 'I am the Whitechapel murderer'. Someone asked him how he had done the murders without making the victims scream, to which he explained that this was done by simply placing the thumb and finger on the windpipe and cutting the throat with the right hand, he also claimed he had done six of them in London. Blanchard said to the landlord, 'you are a fool if you don't get the thousend pounds reward offered for me, You may have as well have it as anyone else'.
When he appeared in court he told the magistrates that after drinking heavily and reading about the murders he had became excited and claimed them as his own. After police inquires, it was proved he was in Manchester when the Whitechapel murders occurred, and had been there for some two months prior to his visit to Birmingham.QFTsafariguy5 wrote:remember that the roles are given randomly. Statistically, benga could very well be town. However, on the off chance that he is one of the killers, accepting a noob defense now puts us on a slippery slope of accepting the same rationale later on. I want to hear a claim from benga before we decide whether to believe him. If he indeed is a killer, I could see him hide behind the noob defense if pressured later on if we allow him to skate with no information now.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Benga, have you given us everything about your role? Seems to me, there's more to your role than just plain VT.benga wrote:If I get lynched it's cause only Mets understands me, not cause I am noob.
I still stand with what I have said, flores just voted me to take away attentions from mine FOSes and yes I was pissed at the time for various reasons.
The only thing I see is Neb whom I have FOSed, is backing up strongly flores defence.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
sorry neb, i meant new guy, at least i got 2 letters rightNebuchadnezer wrote:Did I totally skim where IB and Nag thought I was scummy?FloresDelMal wrote: omgus could be a noob mistake, granted, but i have seen nothing that could make him seem town, so are you just throwing this comment because IB and nag found your and neb behaviour scummy?
FOS DY
DoomYoshi wrote:Er, nevermind, it's there lol.
Bring da pressure. I already told you who I was, but the clupes are hard to see.

I am not sure if it's wise for me to say it...all those forcing me to say feel very scummy to mekratos644 wrote:Had a little free time today so I've read up. Haven't seen anything overly scummy due to the things that would normally appear scummy not appearing as scummy when considering meta. I believe benga's claim. There usually seems to be some language barrier issues which leads to things that appear very OMGUS like. I would like the remainder of the information as well. If you're going to claim don't half do it. That's what gets people lynched
You're new, so you'll learn...but there are very few instances where it is beneficial for town to LIE about their roles. I have not voted you because I do think your role is not mafia. However, I could tell that your original claim was crap. For you to think I am scummy because I smelled a half-claim is a little, well, stupid.benga wrote:I am not sure if it's wise for me to say it...all those forcing me to say feel very scummy to mekratos644 wrote:Had a little free time today so I've read up. Haven't seen anything overly scummy due to the things that would normally appear scummy not appearing as scummy when considering meta. I believe benga's claim. There usually seems to be some language barrier issues which leads to things that appear very OMGUS like. I would like the remainder of the information as well. If you're going to claim don't half do it. That's what gets people lynched
wish I had more experience that this...
but think my role is more important down the way
okay here goes: I get to vote 2 times, my 2nd vote will be marked as ? and I have now lost my ability for this and next day
at this point it seems to me that neb saf and flores are somehow in connection
neb and saf protecting flores and constantly forcing me the reveal myself
benga didn't lie. He never said he was VT or didn't have special abilities. The fact that you are calling it a lie is very scummy. If he later adds that he does have a special power, that doesn't make his original claim "crap."Nebuchadnezer wrote: You're new, so you'll learn...but there are very few instances where it is beneficial for town to LIE about their roles. I have not voted you because I do think your role is not mafia. However, I could tell that your original claim was crap. For you to think I am scummy because I smelled a half-claim is a little, well, stupid.
Also, there is a saying...LAL (Lynch All Liars)...meaning that if you lie, you have something to hide, which only scum have something to hide, therefore, the scummy action of lying means you are scum. I am not going to apply that here, but as a policy lynch, you've just given scum an easy way to wagon on to you, get a lynch, and claim they voted because of LAL. After all, if you lied once, why should we believe you aren't lying again, or won't in the future?
If there's something you want us to know, it might be fruitful to tell us instead of obscuring information.DoomYoshi wrote:Nobody's going to even try to figure out where I claimed already?
There are certain protocols that apply to mafia. One of the rules I live by, in this case a strong piece of advice, is that just because you are Town does not mean others will believe you are Town. Just because you believe something does not make it true. If several people seem to be ganging up on you it could equally mean they believe there is a strong chance you are scum, weather you are Town or not.benga wrote:I am not sure if it's wise for me to say it...all those forcing me to say feel very scummy to mekratos644 wrote:Had a little free time today so I've read up. Haven't seen anything overly scummy due to the things that would normally appear scummy not appearing as scummy when considering meta. I believe benga's claim. There usually seems to be some language barrier issues which leads to things that appear very OMGUS like. I would like the remainder of the information as well. If you're going to claim don't half do it. That's what gets people lynched
wish I had more experience that this...
but think my role is more important down the way
okay here goes: I get to vote 2 times, my 2nd vote will be marked as ? and I have now lost my ability for this and next day
at this point it seems to me that neb saf and flores are somehow in connection
neb and saf protecting flores and constantly forcing me the reveal myself

His claim was basically claiming that he was a VT. He said he can vote and didn't act like he could do anything elseMetsfanmax wrote:benga didn't lie. He never said he was VT or didn't have special abilities. The fact that you are calling it a lie is very scummy. If he later adds that he does have a special power, that doesn't make his original claim "crap."Nebuchadnezer wrote: You're new, so you'll learn...but there are very few instances where it is beneficial for town to LIE about their roles. I have not voted you because I do think your role is not mafia. However, I could tell that your original claim was crap. For you to think I am scummy because I smelled a half-claim is a little, well, stupid.
Also, there is a saying...LAL (Lynch All Liars)...meaning that if you lie, you have something to hide, which only scum have something to hide, therefore, the scummy action of lying means you are scum. I am not going to apply that here, but as a policy lynch, you've just given scum an easy way to wagon on to you, get a lynch, and claim they voted because of LAL. After all, if you lied once, why should we believe you aren't lying again, or won't in the future?
benga wrote:I am part of town, named Alfred Napier Blanchard and I get to vote.
My vote on flores stands, only thing he did in this game is voted me on nothing.
My other suspicions will need time to be confirmed.
so basically you are saying you voted me just to boot me off game? cause I am noob?Nebuchadnezer wrote:You're new, so you'll learn...but there are very few instances where it is beneficial for town to LIE about their roles. I have not voted you because I do think your role is not mafia. However, I could tell that your original claim was crap. For you to think I am scummy because I smelled a half-claim is a little, well, stupid.benga wrote:I am not sure if it's wise for me to say it...all those forcing me to say feel very scummy to mekratos644 wrote:Had a little free time today so I've read up. Haven't seen anything overly scummy due to the things that would normally appear scummy not appearing as scummy when considering meta. I believe benga's claim. There usually seems to be some language barrier issues which leads to things that appear very OMGUS like. I would like the remainder of the information as well. If you're going to claim don't half do it. That's what gets people lynched
wish I had more experience that this...
but think my role is more important down the way
okay here goes: I get to vote 2 times, my 2nd vote will be marked as ? and I have now lost my ability for this and next day
at this point it seems to me that neb saf and flores are somehow in connection
neb and saf protecting flores and constantly forcing me the reveal myself
Also, there is a saying...LAL (Lynch All Liars)...meaning that if you lie, you have something to hide, which only scum have something to hide, therefore, the scummy action of lying means you are scum. I am not going to apply that here, but as a policy lynch, you've just given scum an easy way to wagon on to you, get a lynch, and claim they voted because of LAL. After all, if you lied once, why should we believe you aren't lying again, or won't in the future?
Moving on...
I'm fine with a Doom claim. Doom is such an odd player, that I can never get a read on whether he is scummy, or just erratic in his play. However, the momentum has swung his way, and he should probably claim before the count-down gets him killed.
He can't do anything else, according to his more full claim. He just gets to vote more times than the rest of us. So nothing in his statement was untrue. And it makes total sense why he wouldn't reveal such a power, since that would just make him a potential scum target. Of course, he didn't really need to claim at this point, so maybe the whole thing really is newb gameplay.kratos644 wrote:His claim was basically claiming that he was a VT. He said he can vote and didn't act like he could do anything elseMetsfanmax wrote:benga didn't lie. He never said he was VT or didn't have special abilities. The fact that you are calling it a lie is very scummy. If he later adds that he does have a special power, that doesn't make his original claim "crap."Nebuchadnezer wrote: You're new, so you'll learn...but there are very few instances where it is beneficial for town to LIE about their roles. I have not voted you because I do think your role is not mafia. However, I could tell that your original claim was crap. For you to think I am scummy because I smelled a half-claim is a little, well, stupid.
Also, there is a saying...LAL (Lynch All Liars)...meaning that if you lie, you have something to hide, which only scum have something to hide, therefore, the scummy action of lying means you are scum. I am not going to apply that here, but as a policy lynch, you've just given scum an easy way to wagon on to you, get a lynch, and claim they voted because of LAL. After all, if you lied once, why should we believe you aren't lying again, or won't in the future?
benga wrote:I am part of town, named Alfred Napier Blanchard and I get to vote.
My vote on flores stands, only thing he did in this game is voted me on nothing.
My other suspicions will need time to be confirmed.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Semantics, Metsfanmax...lie by omission is what I consider this...call it half truth, if you makes you feel better. Either way, he mislead on his claim. Quite honestly, I was thinking he is a Miller...but I'm not sure if Millers know they are Millers.Metsfanmax wrote: benga didn't lie. He never said he was VT or didn't have special abilities. The fact that you are calling it a lie is very scummy. If he later adds that he does have a special power, that doesn't make his original claim "crap."
benga wrote: I was pissed at the time by his reason and other stuff...
not sure if he jumped in protection, need more time to investigate
Perhaps I read too far into this, but I was expecting an investigative role.benga wrote: I am part of town, named Alfred Napier Blanchard and I get to vote.
My vote on flores stands, only thing he did in this game is voted me on nothing.
My other suspicions will need time to be confirmed.
Benga. You are frustrating me. I HAVE NOT VOTED FOR YOU! QUIT SAYING THAT I HAVE. I also have not lobbied for your lynch at all...in fact, I've given quite a bit of leeway...more than I would give any other player had they pulled all the posts you have. Please move on, so this doesn't turn into a distraction.benga wrote: so basically you are saying you voted me just to boot me off game? cause I am noob?
and calling me stupid for my vote, yet you want me lynched if my role isn't important, I say that's dumb and scummy to me.
I don't know how that doesn't feel scummy